ImageImageImage

2019 NBA draft part deux

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#641 » by Nick K » Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:34 pm

Klomp wrote:
Mattya wrote:
Klomp wrote:For the record, Towns on 2-pointers away from the rim is only 44.6% for his NBA career, compared to the 52.8% Clarke put up last year....


and does anyone here argue that Towns should be taking 2 pointers away from the rim outside of bail out shots?

You just said you don't want someone taking the ball away from Towns in the post. So unless he gets less than 3 feet from the rim (layups, dunks) on 100% of his post-ups, I guess he's taking either a lot of bail-out shots or he's hurting the offense by taking bad shots.

But hey, if that's what you want over someone who's 50% inside the arc at his worst....


That's exactly right. Clarke is an extremely risky pick to take at 11. Clarke should be drafted 25-35 based on his measurables and broken shot. If you take him 25 and he's mediocre or a bust then you can live with it. Taking him at 11 hurts the franchise so much if he doesn't work out. If he's great you can live with it. Find some other sleeper with your 2nd rd pick that's blows up to all star.

I still don't see it on Sekou. I've tried and tried. Huge risk. I keep coming back to safer picks like NAW, or PJ.

Bruno Fernando is a real sleeper that you could get teens or twenties but we don't need a center.

I still think Chuma Okeke will be better than Clarke, Sekou, and a whole bunch of others and you can get him late first or early second.
I hate this draft because I don't love-love anybody that we have a realistic shot at. I love Coby White for our team but he'll be gone.
NAW will surprise everybody. He'll be the quality of Gary Harris or Jamal Murray. I'll take that.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,474
And1: 2,877
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#642 » by Neeva » Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:39 pm

Which is why I want the wolves to trade down.
Two shots is better than one not much difference this draft between players 3-25 IMO
But all other gms probably know that :/
GeekFreak
Sophomore
Posts: 118
And1: 29
Joined: Apr 11, 2019

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#643 » by GeekFreak » Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:15 am

Neeva wrote:Which is why I want the wolves to trade down.
Two shots is better than one not much different this draft between players 3-25 IMO
But all other gms probably know that :/

100% agree, if possible I'd love to trade back with the Celtics. But it's not always so simple to do. Someone else might beat us to the punch, or they don't want our pick. There is not unlimited trade possibilities in the NBA like in the NFL where you have 7-8 picks. There can be very limited trading options.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 29,761
And1: 7,733
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#644 » by Crazy-Canuck » Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:08 am

It would not shock me in the least if Rosas went for Bol Bol at 11.
CP1981
Veteran
Posts: 2,654
And1: 624
Joined: Jan 26, 2018

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#645 » by CP1981 » Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:16 am

Sekou looks like a guy who will either be real good in a few years or just a flat out bust. I don't see much Middle ground with him. It was a good article about him recently where some scouts didn't think he was any good . They didn't think he improved that much and really question his bball IQ
GeekFreak
Sophomore
Posts: 118
And1: 29
Joined: Apr 11, 2019

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#646 » by GeekFreak » Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:38 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:It would not shock me in the least if Rosas went for Bol Bol at 11.

I think Bol is the MOST SKILLED player in this draft, and it ain't even close. If that was the pick my heart would fill with both fear and excitement at the same time. :nod:
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#647 » by Nick K » Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:51 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:It would not shock me in the least if Rosas went for Bol Bol at 11.


Don't laugh. Bol Bol has serious upside. He can rebound, block shots and really shoot it. He could be Rudy Gobert like but a much better shooter. We don't need a center but who knows if they move Gorgui down the road?
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,451
And1: 30,825
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#648 » by Domejandro » Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:53 am

Klomp wrote:
Mattya wrote:and shot 38.2 % from 16-to the 3 point line and 12% behind the line. What an amazing shooter.

Never argued that Clarke is great on long 2s or 3s.

But I thought people wanted to eliminate long 2s? So why is it so important for Clarke to shoot them?

This conversation is painful and I am three pages behind, but the answer to this should be Intuitively obvious. It shows potential portability, as well as indicates his ability to develop from further ranges at an accelerated pace. I’m honestly flabbergasted that is a point of argument, Klomp, it isn’t like he is shooting 80% from the line so it doesn’t matter. The dude shot outside of seventeen feet like four times; it is fine to say “sure he has poor measureables for a Small-Forward and has demonstrated no ability to shoot from range, but his phenomenal athleticism and unbelievably high game sense defensively makes me willing to gamble on his ability to develop offensively”, but let’s not be disingenuous about his huge flaws.
TheDominator273
Starter
Posts: 2,001
And1: 1,083
Joined: Jul 08, 2015

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#649 » by TheDominator273 » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:42 am

Damn 150 posts on Father's Day arguing about the definition of a jump shot? Can the draft get here already?
GeekFreak
Sophomore
Posts: 118
And1: 29
Joined: Apr 11, 2019

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#650 » by GeekFreak » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:47 am

TheDominator273 wrote:Damn 150 posts on Father's Day arguing about the definition of a jump shot? Can the draft get here already?

I have no idea How people get caught up in such debates? I could care less. Or as Jim Peterson has taught me to say: "I couldn't care less".
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,390
And1: 22,799
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#651 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 17, 2019 3:15 am

Nick K wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Mattya wrote:
and does anyone here argue that Towns should be taking 2 pointers away from the rim outside of bail out shots?

You just said you don't want someone taking the ball away from Towns in the post. So unless he gets less than 3 feet from the rim (layups, dunks) on 100% of his post-ups, I guess he's taking either a lot of bail-out shots or he's hurting the offense by taking bad shots.

But hey, if that's what you want over someone who's 50% inside the arc at his worst....


That's exactly right. Clarke is an extremely risky pick to take at 11.

I was actually talking about Towns in the bolded, but whatever. I'm over the conversation.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
alabamawolf
Senior
Posts: 591
And1: 321
Joined: Dec 31, 2011
       

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#652 » by alabamawolf » Mon Jun 17, 2019 3:27 am

How would y’all feel about sliding Covington to the 4? He’s proven to be one of the best defenders in the league, better size than Clarke, and a proven shooter.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,390
And1: 22,799
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#653 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 17, 2019 4:14 am

alabamawolf wrote:How would y’all feel about sliding Covington to the 4? He’s proven to be one of the best defenders in the league, better size than Clarke, and a proven shooter.

If that's what they want to do, fine. But I'd hope we then add a SF in his place. I personally believe we need to keep Wiggins at SG where he can match up against smaller defenders.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,359
And1: 17,285
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#654 » by Calinks » Mon Jun 17, 2019 5:49 am

Image

Three more days until draft!
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,390
And1: 22,799
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#655 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 17, 2019 5:53 am

Calinks wrote:Image

Three more days until draft!

I prefer this one

Image
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,390
And1: 22,799
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#656 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:41 am

I want to take this Brandon Clarke discussion a different direction. I think we've exhausted every possible angle about offense, but I would like to focus on his defense.

I still don't think he gets enough credit for his work on that end of the court. He's really good. And I personally believe that our defense needs far more improvement than our offense. Not only that, but I believe the frontcourt needs another jolt of athleticism. Towns is athletic, but Dieng and Saric are not. Bates-Diop or Covington can slide down, but I still don't think it's enough.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
wesleyt95
Rookie
Posts: 1,158
And1: 277
Joined: Sep 23, 2018
 

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#657 » by wesleyt95 » Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:10 am

Klomp wrote:I want to take this Brandon Clarke discussion a different direction. I think we've exhausted every possible angle about offense, but I would like to focus on his defense.

I still don't think he gets enough credit for his work on that end of the court. He's really good. And I personally believe that our defense needs far more improvement than our offense. Not only that, but I believe the frontcourt needs another jolt of athleticism. Towns is athletic, but Dieng and Saric are not. Bates-Diop or Covington can slide down, but I still don't think it's enough.

If we're only looking at defense i'd rather draft Nic Claxton 6'11 7'2 wingspan, great defender and even more potential at the next level, younger, can handle the ball
YaleS
Sophomore
Posts: 213
And1: 63
Joined: Aug 22, 2014

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#658 » by YaleS » Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:28 am

wesleyt95 wrote:
Klomp wrote:I want to take this Brandon Clarke discussion a different direction. I think we've exhausted every possible angle about offense, but I would like to focus on his defense.

I still don't think he gets enough credit for his work on that end of the court. He's really good. And I personally believe that our defense needs far more improvement than our offense. Not only that, but I believe the frontcourt needs another jolt of athleticism. Towns is athletic, but Dieng and Saric are not. Bates-Diop or Covington can slide down, but I still don't think it's enough.

If we're only looking at defense i'd rather draft Nic Claxton 6'11 7'2 wingspan, great defender and even more potential at the next level, younger, can handle the ball


Brandon has the exact same measurables as rookie Klay Thompson, so I am curius how his strongest offensive skill - finishing around the rim will translate, as well as his best defensive skill - ability to switch and defent the rim too. He will probably be great perimeter defender, who can help down on most nights, but also be useless guarding the rim againts great competition/bad match ups.
YaleS
Sophomore
Posts: 213
And1: 63
Joined: Aug 22, 2014

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#659 » by YaleS » Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:36 am

How do you feel about trading our pick this year? We lack the talent to go win now mode even with GSW probably out of the picture and for me, what we really need out of a draft is a young pg to pair with KAT. This years draft is very poor on pgs overall and taking a gamble on any of them seems like a really bad idea to me. I will go out on a limb and say that no allstar/very high level point guard will come out of this draft. Maybe players like PJ, Clarke, Nassir, Hayes will be good players and are worth a shot for most teams, but are they worth the shot to us?
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,712
And1: 5,205
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: 2019 NBA draft part deux 

Post#660 » by minimus » Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:26 am

Cant wait for draft night. We are not the luckiest team in NBA, but I hope that we will be the most prepared one. From top to bottom.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves