ImageImageImage

Butler has requested a trade, the saga continues

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Mattya
RealGM
Posts: 17,523
And1: 7,916
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
   

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#661 » by Mattya » Sat Oct 13, 2018 3:03 pm

AhUtopian wrote:Just curious.

What would you suggest Thib doing when Jimmy told Thib what Jimmy thinking four days after eliminated?

I f I were Thib,all I could have done was telling Jimmy this team will get better during offseason ,and tried to convince Jimmy to wait and see.

It's not until Taylor choosed a side and KAT leaked "either me or Butler",Jimmy made it public?

Sent from my SM-G965F using RealGM mobile app


Or Jimmy is lying. Considering Taj had no idea, and every report outside of Jimmy leaking this has been saying the trade request was right before training camp.
twix2500
RealGM
Posts: 27,912
And1: 28,219
Joined: Dec 25, 2003
   

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#662 » by twix2500 » Sat Oct 13, 2018 4:59 pm

Record wise, what would the team record have to be where you will say ok let's take the best offer available? What would the record have to be to conitue to tryto find exactly what you want? And what does the record have to be for you say lets just ride it out to the end?

Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,171
And1: 6,306
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#663 » by KGdaBom » Sat Oct 13, 2018 5:02 pm

twix2500 wrote:Record wise, what would the team record have to be where you will say ok let's take the best offer available? What would the record have to be to conitue to tryto find exactly what you want? And what does the record have to be for you say lets just ride it out to the end?

Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk

I'm looking for 82-0 and sweeping the playoffs. :D
TheDominator273
Starter
Posts: 2,001
And1: 1,083
Joined: Jul 08, 2015

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#664 » by TheDominator273 » Sat Oct 13, 2018 5:02 pm

twix2500 wrote:Record wise, what would the team record have to be where you will say ok let's take the best offer available? What would the record have to be to conitue to tryto find exactly what you want? And what does the record have to be for you say lets just ride it out to the end?

Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
I really don't think record plays into it too much to be honest. I'm of the opinion we keep Butler until we get an offer we like or let him walk which frees up some financial flexibility and could turn into clear cap space if Teague opts out after the season.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,418
And1: 19,471
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#665 » by shrink » Sat Oct 13, 2018 5:15 pm

twix2500 wrote:Record wise, what would the team record have to be where you will say ok let's take the best offer available? What would the record have to be to conitue to tryto find exactly what you want? And what does the record have to be for you say lets just ride it out to the end?

The bad thing for MIA is Thibs wants to keep his job. If the record goes south, it becomes more necessary for Thibs to win the Butler trade.

If MIA’s most recent “final offer” includes dumping Waiters on them, the total value of the package costs Thibs his job. There is no reason to take it now, rather than wait until the deadline, to get a rental price from a team that wants to do well in the playoffs. Perhaps better than rental, because Butler’s Bird rights, and the chance to get a fifth year, seems very important to him.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,741
And1: 11,430
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#666 » by wco81 » Sat Oct 13, 2018 5:22 pm

Thing I don't get is, why trade away Lavine, Dunn and Markkanen for Butler if they weren't going to extend Butler?

I can understand if the Wolves didn't plan to re-sign Lavine and Dunn. But they gave away a top 10 pick which became Markkanen?
FargoWolf
Pro Prospect
Posts: 862
And1: 395
Joined: Mar 05, 2015
       

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#667 » by FargoWolf » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:06 pm

wco81 wrote:Thing I don't get is, why trade away Lavine, Dunn and Markkanen for Butler if they weren't going to extend Butler?

I can understand if the Wolves didn't plan to re-sign Lavine and Dunn. But they gave away a top 10 pick which became Markkanen?


I get it, Glen Taylor owns the team and is clueless.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#668 » by big3_8_19_21 » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:14 pm

I think Butler’s unreasonable desire to have his contract renegotiated and extended this summer is still partly because he has a hangover from 2015 free agency. He was basically forced into signing a long term deal the summer before he knew the salary cap was about to explode because the Bulls extended both the qualifying offer and the maximum qualifying offer. Extending the maximum qualifying offer meant that no team could sign him to an offer sheet shorter than 3 years and there could be no options (player or team) on any of those years. At the time there was talk that he wanted to sign a 1 year offer sheet with the Lakers, but then the Bulls extended the max QO, so he had to sign a long term deal. First time in NBA history that had ever been done, I think. His other option was to lose a ton of money and risk injury for another year by taking the $4.4 million QO to become unrestricted in 2016.

We’ve just finished year 3 of his deal that has a player option after 4 and right or wrong I think he viewed the renegotiation and extension as the Wolves making good on the money that the Bulls screwed him out of by keeping him out of free agency and cap spike.

That being said the Wolves would have had to fit their roster and not been able to field a competitive team around him to get the requisite $10 million below the cap to give him a $10 million raise.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,469
And1: 12,340
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#669 » by Worm Guts » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:17 pm

wco81 wrote:Thing I don't get is, why trade away Lavine, Dunn and Markkanen for Butler if they weren't going to extend Butler?

I can understand if the Wolves didn't plan to re-sign Lavine and Dunn. But they gave away a top 10 pick which became Markkanen?


They offered Jimmy a max extension.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#670 » by big3_8_19_21 » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:25 pm

FargoWolf wrote:
wco81 wrote:Thing I don't get is, why trade away Lavine, Dunn and Markkanen for Butler if they weren't going to extend Butler?

I can understand if the Wolves didn't plan to re-sign Lavine and Dunn. But they gave away a top 10 pick which became Markkanen?


I get it, Glen Taylor owns the team and is clueless.

For the millionth time, the Wolves offered the max allowable extension this summer, which Jimmy turned down because he stands to make a lot more by waiting until next summer to sign a 5 year $190 million max with whatever team has his bird rights.

The one way we would could have paid Jimmy more this summer is with a renegotiation. In order to do a renegotiation and extension like that, we would have to clear that amount of money under the cap. We can’t renegotiate and extend over the cap. So in order to give Jimmy the $10 million raise he wanted, we would have had to get $10 million under the cap. This would have meant gutting the rest of the roster to the point of being non-competitive.

No one ever said the Wolves weren’t going to pay him. They just didn’t want to burn down the roster to do it one year earlier.

If you’re not going to bother reading even a single article about the topic, save your opinion.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
User avatar
PharmD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,964
And1: 5,559
Joined: Aug 21, 2015
 

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#671 » by PharmD » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:27 pm

wco81 wrote:Thing I don't get is, why trade away Lavine, Dunn and Markkanen for Butler if they weren't going to extend Butler?

I can understand if the Wolves didn't plan to re-sign Lavine and Dunn. But they gave away a top 10 pick which became Markkanen?

The plan obviously was to extend Butler. We did offer him a 'max' extension this offseason, it was just smaller than the max he could get next offseason and he turned it down.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 37,368
And1: 32,224
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#672 » by AirP. » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:28 pm

big3_8_19_21 wrote:That being said the Wolves would have had to fit their roster and not been able to field a competitive team around him to get the requisite $10 million below the cap to give him a $10 million raise.

Although I don't think they should have renegotiated with him this season, without Butler Minnesota isn't fielding a competitive team, for some reason Towns and Wiggins have no "fight" in them, talent yes, desire to win no. I would guess this Butler situation has way more to do about their "fight" since those 2 names keep coming up with Butler.

If Towns and Wiggins had Butler's or Okogie's effort level(or something close)... this team would be special.
FargoWolf
Pro Prospect
Posts: 862
And1: 395
Joined: Mar 05, 2015
       

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#673 » by FargoWolf » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:33 pm

big3_8_19_21 wrote:
FargoWolf wrote:
wco81 wrote:Thing I don't get is, why trade away Lavine, Dunn and Markkanen for Butler if they weren't going to extend Butler?

I can understand if the Wolves didn't plan to re-sign Lavine and Dunn. But they gave away a top 10 pick which became Markkanen?


I get it, Glen Taylor owns the team and is clueless.

For the millionth time, the Wolves offered the max allowable extension this summer, which Jimmy turned down because he stands to make a lot more by waiting until next summer to sign a 5 year $190 million max with whatever team has his bird rights.

The one way we would could have paid Jimmy more this summer is with a renegotiation. In order to do a renegotiation and extension like that, we would have to clear that amount of money under the cap. We can’t renegotiate and extend over the cap. So in order to give Jimmy the $10 million raise he wanted, we would have had to get $10 million under the cap. This would have meant gutting the rest of the roster to the point of being non-competitive.

No one ever said the Wolves weren’t going to pay him. They just didn’t want to burn down the roster to do it one year earlier.

If you’re not going to bother reading even a single article about the topic, save your opinion.


I blame Taylor for Wiggins, that contract is where it all starts and it is going to cripple the franchise for a while.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,906
And1: 1,075
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#674 » by Dewey » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:43 pm

FargoWolf wrote:
big3_8_19_21 wrote:
FargoWolf wrote:
I get it, Glen Taylor owns the team and is clueless.

For the millionth time, the Wolves offered the max allowable extension this summer, which Jimmy turned down because he stands to make a lot more by waiting until next summer to sign a 5 year $190 million max with whatever team has his bird rights.

The one way we would could have paid Jimmy more this summer is with a renegotiation. In order to do a renegotiation and extension like that, we would have to clear that amount of money under the cap. We can’t renegotiate and extend over the cap. So in order to give Jimmy the $10 million raise he wanted, we would have had to get $10 million under the cap. This would have meant gutting the rest of the roster to the point of being non-competitive.

No one ever said the Wolves weren’t going to pay him. They just didn’t want to burn down the roster to do it one year earlier.

If you’re not going to bother reading even a single article about the topic, save your opinion.


I blame Taylor for Wiggins, that contract is where it all starts and it is going to cripple the franchise for a while.

Just cant resist pointing a finger at someone to blame for something?
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
FargoWolf
Pro Prospect
Posts: 862
And1: 395
Joined: Mar 05, 2015
       

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#675 » by FargoWolf » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:50 pm

Dewey wrote:
FargoWolf wrote:
big3_8_19_21 wrote:For the millionth time, the Wolves offered the max allowable extension this summer, which Jimmy turned down because he stands to make a lot more by waiting until next summer to sign a 5 year $190 million max with whatever team has his bird rights.

The one way we would could have paid Jimmy more this summer is with a renegotiation. In order to do a renegotiation and extension like that, we would have to clear that amount of money under the cap. We can’t renegotiate and extend over the cap. So in order to give Jimmy the $10 million raise he wanted, we would have had to get $10 million under the cap. This would have meant gutting the rest of the roster to the point of being non-competitive.

No one ever said the Wolves weren’t going to pay him. They just didn’t want to burn down the roster to do it one year earlier.

If you’re not going to bother reading even a single article about the topic, save your opinion.


I blame Taylor for Wiggins, that contract is where it all starts and it is going to cripple the franchise for a while.

Just cant resist pointing a finger at someone to blame for something?


Everyone else is pointing fingers, may as well point them at the right person. Nothing changes with this franchise until Glen is gone.
TheDominator273
Starter
Posts: 2,001
And1: 1,083
Joined: Jul 08, 2015

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#676 » by TheDominator273 » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:58 pm

I want to know where the KAT has no desire to win narrative started. Wiggins I get, he shows no emotion ever and appears to be sleepwalking through games but KAT shows plenty of emotion and desire to win on top of being a hard worker according to teammates.

It just confuses me how is a poor defender playing in a scheme that places him in bad position somehow has become he is soft and has no desire to win.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,400
And1: 22,809
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#677 » by Klomp » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:15 pm

lbj273 wrote:I want to know where the KAT has no desire to win narrative started. Wiggins I get, he shows no emotion ever and appears to be sleepwalking through games but KAT shows plenty of emotion and desire to win on top of being a hard worker according to teammates.

It just confuses me how is a poor defender playing in a scheme that places him in bad position somehow has become he is soft and has no desire to win.

Poor defense apparently equals no desire to win in the latest NBA fandom book. Have to be the best player in the NBA on both sides of the ball or it must mean you don't care enough.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
LibertyPrime
Starter
Posts: 2,314
And1: 1,972
Joined: Dec 08, 2013
 

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#678 » by LibertyPrime » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:19 pm

shrink wrote:Richardson, Wiggins (when he’s not the 3, always plays big minutes) and probably 1st round pick Josh Okogi would all get minutes over Waiters. Heck, Thibs wants to play Derrick Rose at the 2 as well.

I see Waiters sitting on our bench for three years, eating $12 mil a year.


Or worse yet, taking over the "bench chucker who destroys our second unit's cohesion and efficiency" so recently occupied by Shabazz Muhammed and Jamal Crawford.
"The last domino falls here!"
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#679 » by Nick K » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:23 pm

big3_8_19_21 wrote:
FargoWolf wrote:
wco81 wrote:Thing I don't get is, why trade away Lavine, Dunn and Markkanen for Butler if they weren't going to extend Butler?

I can understand if the Wolves didn't plan to re-sign Lavine and Dunn. But they gave away a top 10 pick which became Markkanen?


I get it, Glen Taylor owns the team and is clueless.

For the millionth time, the Wolves offered the max allowable extension this summer, which Jimmy turned down because he stands to make a lot more by waiting until next summer to sign a 5 year $190 million max with whatever team has his bird rights.

The one way we would could have paid Jimmy more this summer is with a renegotiation. In order to do a renegotiation and extension like that, we would have to clear that amount of money under the cap. We can’t renegotiate and extend over the cap. So in order to give Jimmy the $10 million raise he wanted, we would have had to get $10 million under the cap. This would have meant gutting the rest of the roster to the point of being non-competitive.

No one ever said the Wolves weren’t going to pay him. They just didn’t want to burn down the roster to do it one year earlier.

If you’re not going to bother reading even a single article about the topic, save your opinion.


Nice job explaining that in a way even I can understand. :)
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice 

Post#680 » by Nick K » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:30 pm

LibertyPrime wrote:
shrink wrote:Richardson, Wiggins (when he’s not the 3, always plays big minutes) and probably 1st round pick Josh Okogi would all get minutes over Waiters. Heck, Thibs wants to play Derrick Rose at the 2 as well.

I see Waiters sitting on our bench for three years, eating $12 mil a year.


Or worse yet, taking over the "bench chucker who destroys our second unit's cohesion and efficiency" so recently occupied by Shabazz Muhammed and Jamal Crawford.


Derek Rose replaced those guys and is equally bad if not worse. Roses role cannot be what is was last night. He can't be allowed to go off wildly as he did.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves