2016 draft thread: Part 2
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
sky4it
- Junior
- Posts: 287
- And1: 83
- Joined: Mar 03, 2015
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Will Buddy Hield be available for the Timberwolves to draft at number 5?
The Celtics cant just let a player slip by because the player doesnt fulfill there satisfaction immediately, or because the fans want some excitement. They will pick the best player whatever the circumstance. Therefore if the Celtics regard Bender the best player in there evaluation, they will make that pick.
If the Suns dont trade the fourth pick, Buddy Hield should be there at number 5 and be the choice. (Obviously the Suns are stacked at guard, and with Booker just dont need a shooting guard.)
Looks like a great chance Buddy Hield is available at number 5.
The Celtics cant just let a player slip by because the player doesnt fulfill there satisfaction immediately, or because the fans want some excitement. They will pick the best player whatever the circumstance. Therefore if the Celtics regard Bender the best player in there evaluation, they will make that pick.
If the Suns dont trade the fourth pick, Buddy Hield should be there at number 5 and be the choice. (Obviously the Suns are stacked at guard, and with Booker just dont need a shooting guard.)
Looks like a great chance Buddy Hield is available at number 5.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,540
- And1: 7,929
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/735568192416980994[/tweet]
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
ESPNSAMI
- Ballboy
- Posts: 38
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 06, 2015
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Burn that footage.
Rather keep Rubio
Praying for Jamal Murray to be there at 5!
Rather keep Rubio
Praying for Jamal Murray to be there at 5!
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Sugarless
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,526
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
sky4it wrote:Will Buddy Hield be available for the Timberwolves to draft at number 5?
The Celtics cant just let a player slip by because the player doesnt fulfill there satisfaction immediately, or because the fans want some excitement. They will pick the best player whatever the circumstance. Therefore if the Celtics regard Bender the best player in there evaluation, they will make that pick.
If the Suns dont trade the fourth pick, Buddy Hield should be there at number 5 and be the choice. (Obviously the Suns are stacked at guard, and with Booker just dont need a shooting guard.)
Looks like a great chance Buddy Hield is available at number 5.
Boston an/or Phoenix could trade their picks and this would mean nothing, but if everything stays as it is now, it'll all depend on the Celtics selection, IMO. If they feel Bender is the real deal or that they can wait for him, they'll get Dragan. Otherwise, the guy that seems more appropiate for them is Buddy Hield.
So to me right now it's either:
1) Ingram/Simmons
2) Simmons/Ingram
3) Bender
4) Dunn (they'd have to move BK, but I just don't see anyone taking Brown at no. 4 and with Booker on the team they don't really have the room for another SG that can't play PG nor SF like Hield and Murray).
Or:
1) Ingram/Simmons
2) Simmons/Ingram
3) Hield
4) Bender
However, a lot of things can change over the next 4 weeks. We'll have a clearer picture as we get closer to the draft.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Worm Guts
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 27,474
- And1: 12,341
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
I think Ainge is always looking for the next superstar. Bender is probably the guy with the highest upside or provides the most value to a team looking to flip its superstar and start rebuilding.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,514
- And1: 22,902
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Supposedly Ainge doesn't like taking Euros, so not necessarily a lock he takes Bender. I think Hield and Murray are strong possibilities there.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,514
- And1: 22,902
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
ESPNSAMI wrote:Burn that footage.
Rather keep Rubio
Porque no los dos?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Mattya wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/735568192416980994[/tweet]
Way too much dribbling.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Worm Guts
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 27,474
- And1: 12,341
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
john2jer wrote:Mattya wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/735568192416980994[/tweet]
Way too much dribbling.
In 2 on 2?
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Worm Guts wrote:john2jer wrote:Mattya wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/735568192416980994[/tweet]
Way too much dribbling.
In 2 on 2?
That looks to be a game of 2 on 2.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Worm Guts
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 27,474
- And1: 12,341
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
john2jer wrote:Worm Guts wrote:john2jer wrote:
Way too much dribbling.
In 2 on 2?
That looks to be a game of 2 on 2.
That's my question. Too much dribbling for a game of 2-2? I would expect more dribbling to be required with less options for passing, but I don't know.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Worm Guts wrote:john2jer wrote:Worm Guts wrote:
In 2 on 2?
That looks to be a game of 2 on 2.
That's my question. Too much dribbling for a game of 2-2? I would expect more dribbling to be required with less options for passing, but I don't know.
1. He takes about 3 unnecessary dribbles coming out of that reverse dribble.
2. It was mostly tongue in cheek. It's an 8 second video, and the season of overreacting to workouts.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,540
- And1: 7,929
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:ESPNSAMI wrote:Burn that footage.
Rather keep Rubio
Porque no los dos?
This. I really like the idea of having Dunn or Murray come off the bench.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Murphs56
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,699
- And1: 1,250
- Joined: Nov 13, 2012
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
I think a lot on here underestimate Dunn's value around the league. Many expect him to be gone before 5, but if he's on the board, i'd bet a lot of teams will be calling.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Takingbaconback
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,952
- And1: 2,625
- Joined: Jun 22, 2013
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Murphs56 wrote:I think a lot on here underestimate Dunn's value around the league. Many expect him to be gone before 5, but if he's on the board, i'd bet a lot of teams will be calling.
I feel like Wolves covet him as well. I'm not sure what a team can offer to entice a trade out or a trade down.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Killboard
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,374
- And1: 943
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Takingbaconback wrote:Murphs56 wrote:I think a lot on here underestimate Dunn's value around the league. Many expect him to be gone before 5, but if he's on the board, i'd bet a lot of teams will be calling.
I feel like Wolves covet him as well. I'm not sure what a team can offer to entice a trade out or a trade down.
That's great cause the phone will be ring. But is worth to remember Dunn was projected like a low lottery pick last year, and his stock improved only by being healthy and as result of a weaker class. Despite that I see him like a decent floor-high upside player. He could struggle and still being a rotation player. But if he pan out, he could be an allstar.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
jpatrick
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,744
- And1: 1,965
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Outside of the top two, all these guys would be low lottery picks if stuck in last years draft. It's just a much weaker class. Doesn't mean these guys can't become good players though.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
the_bruce
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,536
- And1: 57
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
jpatrick wrote:Outside of the top two, all these guys would be low lottery picks if stuck in last years draft. It's just a much weaker class. Doesn't mean these guys can't become good players though.
People say this "weaker" than previous years every draft, but it's almost never true. Every draft is roughly the same with there being a handful of players able to become special, every 8-10 drafts there's a lebron, every few drafts there's a player that develops into a great player even though they weren't the top ranked guy in their draft class.
Look at this draft simmons, ingram, hield, murray, dunn, bender at the top of draft all have a very good shot at being special players at the next level. Then there's a host of players coming out after having very good freshman season chriss, brown, davis, skal, elleson,
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
wolves_89
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,134
- And1: 4,621
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
the_bruce wrote:jpatrick wrote:Outside of the top two, all these guys would be low lottery picks if stuck in last years draft. It's just a much weaker class. Doesn't mean these guys can't become good players though.
People say this "weaker" than previous years every draft, but it's almost never true. Every draft is roughly the same with there being a handful of players able to become special, every 8-10 drafts there's a lebron, every few drafts there's a player that develops into a great player even though they weren't the top ranked guy in their draft class.
Look at this draft simmons, ingram, hield, murray, dunn, bender at the top of draft all have a very good shot at being special players at the next level. Then there's a host of players coming out after having very good freshman season chriss, brown, davis, skal, elleson,
In a lot of ways there is similarity between the top of last years draft and this years. Granted I don't think there is a Towns level talent this year, but if you take him out of the mix the rest of the top 7 or so are not that different. Here's how I would compare:
Russel-Ingram: seem to be of a similar talent level
Okafor-Simmons: I'd probably prefer Simmons, but it's not that big a gap if you consider Okafor's value when he was drafted
Porzingis-Bender: At draft time Porzingis was every bit the mystery that Bender is
Hezonja-Murray: Both young guards with big upside
Cauley-Stein-Hield: Very different players, but each is older with an elite skill (Hield's shooting and Stein's defense)
Mudiay-Dunn: Mudiay is younger with big upside but I suspect Dunn will be the better player at least early in his career
Johnson-Brown: Similar players with very good athletic ability but questionable shooting
Towns will likely make last years draft class superior to this year, but I'm not completely sold that the rest of the early lottery is all that much better than this year's crop.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
HitmanCapone
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 750
- And1: 130
- Joined: Jun 19, 2013
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
I'm sticking with the guy I said I wanted a few months ago, before the start of the Tourney but I still really like Buddy Hield for us. His shooting is much needed and would do wonders for our spacing. Other players that I like in the mid to later part of the draft are PF - Domantas Sabonis, PF - Brice Johnson, C - Diamond Stone & PG - Gary Payton II.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves





