ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,458
And1: 5,985
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#681 » by winforlose » Wed Dec 20, 2023 8:35 pm

wolves_89 wrote:
shrink wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:
It seems like a bad idea to add a guy that no team in the NBA thinks is worth a minimum contract.

Do we? Is he better than MacLaughlin as Conley insurance?

I'm not a McLauglin fan, but he's significantly better than Rivers.


Leaps and bounds. Miles and miles. Head and shoulders. Far and away. I could go on.
frankenwolf
Senior
Posts: 580
And1: 523
Joined: Oct 06, 2008

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#682 » by frankenwolf » Wed Dec 20, 2023 8:49 pm

winforlose wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:
shrink wrote:Do we? Is he better than MacLaughlin as Conley insurance?

I'm not a McLauglin fan, but he's significantly better than Rivers.


Leaps and bounds. Miles and miles. Head and shoulders. Far and away. I could go on.


So Ricky & the Cavs are working toward a buyout. Do we think the third time would be a charm??
Your 2026-2027 NBA Champions!! :D
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,458
And1: 5,985
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#683 » by winforlose » Wed Dec 20, 2023 8:52 pm

frankenwolf wrote:
winforlose wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:I'm not a McLauglin fan, but he's significantly better than Rivers.


Leaps and bounds. Miles and miles. Head and shoulders. Far and away. I could go on.


So Ricky & the Cavs are working toward a buyout. Do we think the third time would be a charm??


I don’t think he wants to be here. I don’t think he is any kind of basketball shape. I don’t think he floor spaces well enough, and I don’t think he defends well enough. All of the above being true, I might bring him in as a 3rd string to backup JMAC on the last day of the season.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,619
And1: 19,716
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#684 » by shrink » Wed Dec 20, 2023 8:54 pm

I wrote this elsewhere

shrink wrote:You’re right - Minnesota loves Ricky Rubio. He is probably behind only Garnett as the most beloved player in franchise history.

You never know with mental health issues what would help Ricky, and whether he just needs to be away from basketball completely, but I imagine the organization would welcome him in any role. His teammates always loved him and Ant particularly loves Ricky for mentoring him his rookie year too. Even if he couldn’t play, I could see them offering him a role as an assistant coach or even just a special assistant. Just let him walk on the floor at every home game and feel the love of standing ovations.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,163
And1: 4,652
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#685 » by wolves_89 » Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:03 pm

frankenwolf wrote:
winforlose wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:I'm not a McLauglin fan, but he's significantly better than Rivers.


Leaps and bounds. Miles and miles. Head and shoulders. Far and away. I could go on.


So Ricky & the Cavs are working toward a buyout. Do we think the third time would be a charm??


From what I've seen it doesn't sound like Rubio is going to play this season.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,553
And1: 31,012
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#686 » by Domejandro » Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:06 pm

If Minnesota cannot sign anyone else to close out the season, Austin Rivers wouldn't be a terrible pick up as a "break glass" option. Having someone who knows the system in case of a health implosion is valuable in a Playoff situation.

With Ricky Rubio, my understanding is that he is trying to play out a year in Spain before he fully hangs it up. I would absolutely love to bring Ricky Rubio back as a stable mentor, but his time in the NBA is (barring a surprise) likely done.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,941
And1: 3,622
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#687 » by BlacJacMac » Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:06 pm

shrink wrote:Could Austin Rivers be our back up PG?

Knows the team and what Finch wants to run. He’d have a $1.4 mil cap hit for the rest of the season.


I'd rather sign Doc Rivers...
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,754
And1: 23,084
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#688 » by Klomp » Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:09 pm

Dane and Jace talked yesterday, and they currently feel Kyle is too important to the team that they don't think he would be on the move. So we should probably mark down our targets accordingly. The most we're probably looking at bringing back is a return for Milton + Moore, if anything.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,458
And1: 5,985
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#689 » by winforlose » Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:26 pm

Klomp wrote:Dane and Jace talked yesterday, and they currently feel Kyle is too important to the team that they don't think he would be on the move. So we should probably mark down our targets accordingly. The most we're probably looking at bringing back is a return for Milton + Moore, if anything.


I saw that pod and I feel like Dane lets his own bias drive the show much more recently. He says Finch would never part with Kyle, but he also acknowledges that isn’t based on any conversation with Finch or any direct knowledge. What is really happening is Dane Moore is saying Dane wouldn’t trade Kyle and then backing that up with one sided analysis that completely ignores the reasons to trade him. I think it is 80% likely that we do move Kyle unless Kyle gives a strong indication he is taking a massive paycut to stay. Dane acknowledges that Kyle and Rudy cannot play together very effectively but also fails to acknowledge that if Mike is out for the entire playoffs then Kyle is probably your starting PG. This roster has a massive hole in it. Worse, Finch knows it. He doesn’t call Mike really God Damn Important and talk up the importance of a vet PG late game if he doesn’t understand how thin we are at PG. Like it or not Kyle is the money needed to make any meaningful move.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,553
And1: 31,012
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#690 » by Domejandro » Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:31 pm

I actually agree with Dane about setting expectations around the potential of a Kyle Anderson trade VERY low, but in general, it is definitely worth remembering that Dane Moore is functionally a superfan, not a major sources guy.

That said, I just really don't see Kyle Anderson get traded, he is so important as a glue piece both offensively and defensively.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,458
And1: 5,985
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#691 » by winforlose » Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:37 pm

Domejandro wrote:I actually agree with Dane about setting expectations around the potential of a Kyle Anderson trade VERY low, but in general, it is definitely worth remembering that Dane Moore is functionally a superfan, not a major sources guy.

That said, I just really don't see Kyle Anderson get traded, he is so important as a glue piece both offensively and defensively.


Defensively yes, offensively no. Offensively he is a major problem for floor spacing. You see Ant hit crazy shots and he talks about how hard some of them are. A big part of that is floor spacing. When Ant plays with non shooters they can load up on his driving lanes and make him shoot from distance. Kyle must at least be willing to shoot 3s to space the floor and he is not. All else being equal that kills offense in the playoffs, and we aren’t that good in overall offense to afford the handicap.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,745
And1: 1,966
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#692 » by jpatrick » Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:44 pm

Rubio about to get bought out. But sounds like, at least per the Athletic article, he hasn’t been keeping in shape during his mental health absence and is likely done with basketball (or I’d guess at least the NBA).
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,564
And1: 2,928
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#693 » by Neeva » Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:15 pm

Ricky is done, just draft Juan Nunez, the next Ricky Rubio with our second round pick (via Memphis)
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,178
And1: 3,118
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#694 » by TimberKat » Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:28 pm

Looking at what POR got for Dame and what UTA got for Mitchell (Assume UTA trade Markkie for 3 1st). Gobert trade seems to be a fairly good price for an DPOY candidate .
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,745
And1: 1,966
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#695 » by jpatrick » Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:52 pm

TimberKat wrote:Looking at what POR got for Dame and what UTA got for Mitchell (Assume UTA trade Markkie for 3 1st). Gobert trade seems to be a fairly good price for an DPOY candidate .


I was one of those guys last year calling it one of the worst NBA trades in history, I was wrong. Rudy looked on the decline, but he clearly wasn’t comfortable and/or fully healthy last year.

I still lean towards not doing the trade if given the option. Rudy obviously makes us much better this year. But the money/age shrinks our window and Kessler on a rookie contract gives us so much more flexibility over the next few years. That said, if we make the finals with Rudy, they can never take that away from us.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,613
And1: 6,473
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#696 » by KGdaBom » Wed Dec 20, 2023 11:25 pm

jpatrick wrote:
TimberKat wrote:Looking at what POR got for Dame and what UTA got for Mitchell (Assume UTA trade Markkie for 3 1st). Gobert trade seems to be a fairly good price for an DPOY candidate .


I was one of those guys last year calling it one of the worst NBA trades in history, I was wrong. Rudy looked on the decline, but he clearly wasn’t comfortable and/or fully healthy last year.

I still lean towards not doing the trade if given the option. Rudy obviously makes us much better this year. But the money/age shrinks our window and Kessler on a rookie contract gives us so much more flexibility over the next few years. That said, if we make the finals with Rudy, they can never take that away from us.

If we take the trouble to make the finals we may as well win them. :D
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,832
And1: 896
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#697 » by Guest84 » Wed Dec 20, 2023 11:29 pm

I'm def in the camp of "don't trade" this year...I think all of the pieces that are contributing to the current success are just too valuable from a chemistry standpoint. I'd rather stand pat and watch the waiver wire.

Also, while not my ideal move, what about adding John Wall? He didn't do too bad with Hou/LAC from what I recall. His shooting might not be ideal but he's a vet, that you could potentially get for cheap and is looking to prove himself. Might also help our transition offense.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,754
And1: 23,084
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#698 » by Klomp » Wed Dec 20, 2023 11:30 pm

Is there anyone in the G League we could look at for PG depth?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,458
And1: 5,985
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#699 » by winforlose » Thu Dec 21, 2023 2:36 am

You guys still think Kyle’s offense is good enough for the playoffs?
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,849
And1: 2,679
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#700 » by younggunsmn » Thu Dec 21, 2023 4:00 am

winforlose wrote:
Saltine wrote:Best case scenario with the cap going up 10%; the Wolves will have about $15 million to work with while staying below the second apron... and need to resign Kyle, Mike and lil jmac. If they are really lucky Mike will resign for the vet minimum (~$3.5m, only $2m against cap), which is about the only way they can keep Kyle.


Kyle might take a pay cut to stay. I was thinking about it.

1. He is having a really bad offensive year.

2. If Kyle is not traded he will have 2 years with the Wolves. One more year, and he has full bird rights.

3. Playing championship basketball (or at least contending for one,) is not something easy to walk away from.

4. Assuming the Rudy stuff is buried he might be happy here.


The way Kyle has played this year and with his shooting falling off a cliff his agent might have to do a lot of legwork to get him a vet minimum next year.

Mike has upped his value with his play this year and even with his age at this point he's looking at MLE at a bare minimum next year.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves