ImageImageImage

The Rob Dillingham Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

frankenwolf
Senior
Posts: 527
And1: 468
Joined: Oct 06, 2008

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#721 » by frankenwolf » Tue Sep 24, 2024 2:01 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
thinktank wrote:
Klomp wrote:Most people here wanted Gary Harris, and were furious when Saunders picked the more unproven LaVine.


I loved Lavine and I love Dilly. ;)

My scouting takes are probably my strongest NBA fan attribute (loved Draymond, hated Simmons, hated Hayes, loved Haliburton, hated Okafor, was calling for TSJ to be picked, etc.). Regarding draft picks, I'm right way more often than I'm wrong. :)

So let it be written.
So let it be done.


It is the way.
Your 2026-2027 NBA Champions!! :D
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,004
And1: 22,546
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#722 » by Klomp » Wed Sep 25, 2024 8:10 pm

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,643
And1: 5,157
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#723 » by minimus » Fri Sep 27, 2024 3:49 pm

I was a big fan of Jaylen Nowell, I thought he was going to be a 6th man candidate, before his 3pt shot completely abandoned him. Nowell was able to create and hit that midrange shot, and still got a lot of opportunities despite being a black hole in offense and providing zero defense.

I always liked Jordan McLaughlin, he was aggressive and decisive despite lacking size and shooting ability. Before injuries he was dunking on people.

I could see either McLaughlin and Nowell still playing for Wolves IF they had developed Dillingham's 3pt shot and dribble. Everyone says that defense and size is the biggest issue of Rob, but I believe that first thing that he must show is ability to create opportunities for himself and others. Nowell could not do it in his last season in MIN, McLaughlin was never such type of player, neither are Monte Morris nor Tyus Jones. Stats say that Monte, Tyus and McLaughlin are pass first guys that have elite AST:TO ratio. But reality is that they never put pressure on offense, yes they execute well when they play next to stars such as Jokic, Morant. But it is not the same situation when Kyle Anderson had to put the ball on the floor in as only reliable ballhandler in second unit. Plus Monte, Tyus and McLaughlin are not pullup 3pt shooters. So give Rob at least this season to show his potential. For the rest we have NAW, Nix, Dozier, Ingles.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,004
And1: 22,546
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#724 » by Klomp » Mon Sep 30, 2024 10:47 pm

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Sealab2024
Starter
Posts: 2,158
And1: 3,153
Joined: Dec 29, 2023
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#725 » by Sealab2024 » Sun Oct 6, 2024 2:42 am

He looked pretty much as advertised in his first preseason game. Electric on the offensive end and undersized and undeveloped on the defensive end. To see decent time he's gonna have to get way better at basic rotations and reads. There's nothing he can do about being one of the smallest guys in the league but he has to be in the right spots making decent rotations and basic reads. That'll probably take him till December or January before he really gets it.

Offensively he's proverbial lightning in a bottle. The future looks bright.
From a fundamental standpoint it is better for a man to have nothing but be under the protection of Jesus Christ than for him to have everything he could ever want yet be completely without.
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,963
And1: 1,178
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#726 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Sun Oct 6, 2024 3:02 am

He look promising. Still have a lot a work to do but he is fast, able to score on almost all positions. For the playmaking and defense, he is lucky , surrounded by smart player. Mike is small and become a good defender in Memphis because he had guys around him like Allen, Zbo... it will be the same for RD. Seems we may have Mike successor here in the coming years.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,004
And1: 22,546
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#727 » by Klomp » Mon Oct 7, 2024 8:21 pm

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,765
And1: 852
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#728 » by Guest84 » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:48 pm

What does everyone think Rob’s ceiling is?

I’m not sure where I stand but watching these last few games has me wondering. Does he have more potential than a Cade Cunningham? Darius Garland? Mike Conley even?
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,108
And1: 4,592
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#729 » by wolves_89 » Thu Oct 17, 2024 12:10 am

Guest84 wrote:What does everyone think Rob’s ceiling is?

I’m not sure where I stand but watching these last few games has me wondering. Does he have more potential than a Cade Cunningham? Darius Garland? Mike Conley even?


I think the 2022-23 version of Darius Garland is a good expectation for what Dillingham can become in 3-4 years. Hopefully Rob would then continue to improve instead of stalling like Garland.
DaMplsKid
Junior
Posts: 342
And1: 158
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#730 » by DaMplsKid » Thu Oct 17, 2024 5:14 pm

Guest84 wrote:What does everyone think Rob’s ceiling is?

I’m not sure where I stand but watching these last few games has me wondering. Does he have more potential than a Cade Cunningham? Darius Garland? Mike Conley even?


Ideally Rob's ceiling is a Steph Curry, Damian Lillard, Kyrie Irving or Trae Young type. I think these superstars have to most similar body type and playing style as he does, with Trae being the ideal comp.

The problem is his size will always be a limitation. He doesn't have the wing span of a Kyrie or the frame to put on that much muscle. He just has narrow shoulders in which I can see him getting that strong.

It's all going to come down to him being able to finish at the rim. This is what separates the Curry/Kyrie's from a Young. We are seeing this already with Dilly in then preseason. This year and next offseason keep him in the weight room, give him a chief and make him practice on finishing threw contact all day. Lucky for us and him he has been put in the perfect place to develop now he just has to put in the work.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,004
And1: 22,546
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#731 » by Klomp » Fri Oct 18, 2024 5:38 am

Doesn't sound like somewhere anywhere near regular rotation minutes...

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,963
And1: 1,178
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#732 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Fri Oct 18, 2024 7:25 am

Klomp wrote:Doesn't sound like somewhere anywhere near regular rotation minutes...

Read on Twitter


Sounds logical to me. We are not in building process but have a window ( short one) to try to win. RD is talented but still far from being able to contribute a lot in a winning team. He will get mostly garbage time, a bit more when Mike, Joe even ANT rest but that's all.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,004
And1: 22,546
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#733 » by Klomp » Thu Oct 31, 2024 8:03 pm

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,336
And1: 19,368
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#734 » by shrink » Sat Nov 2, 2024 3:57 pm

I know a lot of people want to see Rob get some minutes, but remember that we traded out KAT’s 32.7 minutes last year for Randle’s 35.4 and DiVincenzo 26.6. That’s nearly 30 minutes of additional playing time that might have went to the kids.

In the short term, we need to use our minutes to play the vets to help them learn on the fly how to play together and not be so clunky. But I wouldn’t expect a lot of available minutes for them later in the season either. We just have too much win-now talent that needs minutes right now, and unless we have an injury, most of the learning for the youth will again come at Iowa.
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,992
And1: 3,025
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#735 » by TimberKat » Sat Nov 2, 2024 5:16 pm

shrink wrote:I know a lot of people want to see Rob get some minutes, but remember that we traded out KAT’s 32.7 minutes last year for Randle’s 35.4 and DiVincenzo 26.6. That’s nearly 30 minutes of additional playing time that might have went to the kids.

In the short term, we need to use our minutes to play the vets to help them learn on the fly how to play together and not be so clunky. But I wouldn’t expect a lot of available minutes for them later in the season either. We just have too much win-now talent that needs minutes right now, and unless we have an injury, most of the learning for the youth will again come at Iowa.

Agree in principle but Randle + DDV is really replacing KAT + KA mins. In addition, NAW is doing so well. There will be a lot of chances for Rob to play this year.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,336
And1: 19,368
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#736 » by shrink » Sat Nov 2, 2024 5:56 pm

TimberKat wrote:
shrink wrote:I know a lot of people want to see Rob get some minutes, but remember that we traded out KAT’s 32.7 minutes last year for Randle’s 35.4 and DiVincenzo 26.6. That’s nearly 30 minutes of additional playing time that might have went to the kids.

In the short term, we need to use our minutes to play the vets to help them learn on the fly how to play together and not be so clunky. But I wouldn’t expect a lot of available minutes for them later in the season either. We just have too much win-now talent that needs minutes right now, and unless we have an injury, most of the learning for the youth will again come at Iowa.

Agree in principle but Randle + DDV is really replacing KAT + KA mins. In addition, NAW is doing so well. There will be a lot of chances for Rob to play this year.

That’s a great point. SloMo averaged 22.6 minutes last year, and that should have been one source of the development minutes.

Still, I think they will try to limit Mike Conley’s minutes once the team gets in a flow, and maybe they’ll limit everybody a few minutes. The players and coaches seemed very aware that they weren’t prepared for a 98 game season last year. Plus we’ve been very healthy to start the season. I think some minutes will emerge, but the youngins’ will have to be patient and ready.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,336
And1: 19,368
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#737 » by shrink » Mon Nov 4, 2024 11:42 pm

One thing I wanted to add is that I think this demonstrates that GMing a team isn’t something that can be done nimbly, because you’re always making long term plans, while new opportunities and problems come up suddenly. I think there were two cases lately:

First, I think we traded a second to get Monte Morris, not just in case he could help us in the playoffs, but with the intent to get his Bird rights to become the gradual (and cheap) replacement for Mike Conley. Morris even plays in a similar style to Conley, and losing Kyle Anderson would create a need for Morris’ playmaking. I believe that was the plan.

THEN Tim Connelly heard that the Spurs might be willing to trade their #8 pick, and a personal favorite of his, Rob Dillingham could be available. He made the trade, and told everyone that Dillingham would get minutes immediately, so the plan to keep Monte was scrapped.

Second, we went into the season with those minutes SloMo minutes for Dillingham (and maybe Minott).

THEN The Knicks finally included three years of Donte DiVincenzo in a KAT-Randle trade, and Connelly felt he had to bite (especially with an added 1st). Donte is too good to keep on the bench, and the “Play Dillingham” plan had to be scrapped.

Connelly has plans, but he can’t pass up certain opportunities that arise. Hopefully Chris Finch can continue to show his chef’s ability to turn a whole bunch of random things in the kitchen into a beautiful recipe.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,643
And1: 5,157
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#738 » by minimus » Thu Nov 14, 2024 4:48 pm

Read on Twitter
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,643
And1: 5,157
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#739 » by minimus » Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:44 am

Read on Twitter


One thing that I have been waiting for is two-man game Reid+ballhandler. Either DHO, pick-n-roll or pick-n-pop. I have hopes for Reid+DDV, but it would be a pleasant surprise if Reid and Dilly can develop some chemistry
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,004
And1: 22,546
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#740 » by Klomp » Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:38 pm

I think Rob is in the rotation going forward. This is no longer just an injury replacement situation in my mind. He needs to be out there.

It's possible that it won't result in wins immediately. But I think it will pay dividends in the long run.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves