ImageImageImage

The Rob Dillingham Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 12,645
And1: 5,474
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#801 » by winforlose » Thu Feb 13, 2025 4:13 am

Gotta ask, should we send Rob to Iowa. He isn’t exactly helpful most games, and we don’t have many games to spare. Would 35+ minutes a night help develop him more than 15 bad ones with the big team?
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,270
And1: 597
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#802 » by Loaf_of_bread » Thu Feb 13, 2025 4:35 am

winforlose wrote:Gotta ask, should we send Rob to Iowa. He isn’t exactly helpful most games, and we don’t have many games to spare. Would 35+ minutes a night help develop him more than 15 bad ones with the big team?


If mike can play 25 minutes at a high level, i say yes..

Without Mike i think i grit my teeth and go through rob's growing pains. We need pg play.. naw is not that guy.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 12,645
And1: 5,474
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#803 » by winforlose » Thu Feb 13, 2025 4:39 am

Loaf_of_bread wrote:
winforlose wrote:Gotta ask, should we send Rob to Iowa. He isn’t exactly helpful most games, and we don’t have many games to spare. Would 35+ minutes a night help develop him more than 15 bad ones with the big team?


If mike can play 25 minutes at a high level, i say yes..

Without Mike i think i grit my teeth and go through rob's growing pains. We need pg play.. naw is not that guy.


True, but neither is Dilly. He isn’t in growing pains, he is in flat out failure mode. For every one good game he has 5 or more bad ones. His body isn’t ready, his skills are not there, his defense isn’t ready, ect… I have high hopes for Dilly, but I think he has proven by now this is not his time. Maybe we sign someone or even use Jingles for 10 MPG at the PG. Randle and Ant kinda split those minutes/responsibilities anyway. Dilly will not be playable in the playoffs, and I don’t know that these minutes of looking bad, shooting bad, defending badly, and getting humiliated are good for his development.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,270
And1: 597
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#804 » by Loaf_of_bread » Thu Feb 13, 2025 4:51 am

winforlose wrote:
Loaf_of_bread wrote:
winforlose wrote:Gotta ask, should we send Rob to Iowa. He isn’t exactly helpful most games, and we don’t have many games to spare. Would 35+ minutes a night help develop him more than 15 bad ones with the big team?


If mike can play 25 minutes at a high level, i say yes..

Without Mike i think i grit my teeth and go through rob's growing pains. We need pg play.. naw is not that guy.


True, but neither is Dilly. He isn’t in growing pains, he is in flat out failure mode. For every one good game he has 5 or more bad ones. His body isn’t ready, his skills are not there, his defense isn’t ready, ect… I have high hopes for Dilly, but I think he has proven by now this is not his time. Maybe we sign someone or even use Jingles for 10 MPG at the PG. Randle and Ant kinda split those minutes/responsibilities anyway. Dilly will not be playable in the playoffs, and I don’t know that these minutes of looking bad, shooting bad, defending badly, and getting humiliated are good for his development.


I hear you, but personally would like to see a bit more run with Mike out.. also, for the fact we aren't looking to be competitive in the postseason anyway..

If rob struggles over the next few weeks, then, yes.
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,830
And1: 1,034
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#805 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Thu Feb 13, 2025 6:04 am

winforlose wrote:
Loaf_of_bread wrote:
winforlose wrote:Gotta ask, should we send Rob to Iowa. He isn’t exactly helpful most games, and we don’t have many games to spare. Would 35+ minutes a night help develop him more than 15 bad ones with the big team?


If mike can play 25 minutes at a high level, i say yes..

Without Mike i think i grit my teeth and go through rob's growing pains. We need pg play.. naw is not that guy.


True, but neither is Dilly. He isn’t in growing pains, he is in flat out failure mode. For every one good game he has 5 or more bad ones. His body isn’t ready, his skills are not there, his defense isn’t ready, ect… I have high hopes for Dilly, but I think he has proven by now this is not his time. Maybe we sign someone or even use Jingles for 10 MPG at the PG. Randle and Ant kinda split those minutes/responsibilities anyway. Dilly will not be playable in the playoffs, and I don’t know that these minutes of looking bad, shooting bad, defending badly, and getting humiliated are good for his development.


I think Joe at PG was pretty good tonight. He pass well and he can shoot if he play more and find his rhythm. We will enter after ASB in the money time where if we want to be in the PO, we have to make a run. For that Dilly is not good enough right now. Let him develop in G League and next year , give him 15-18 min each game if he is ready.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,252
And1: 4,832
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#806 » by minimus » Sat Mar 1, 2025 3:41 pm

I have not checked numbers but it looks like Rob's finishing at rim has been improving.
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,756
And1: 1,300
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#807 » by TheZachAttack » Sat Mar 1, 2025 4:03 pm

minimus wrote:I have not checked numbers but it looks like Rob's finishing at rim has been improving.


I agree. His jump shot has been off, but I almost feel like it’s a product of (1) a limited role and limited volume (2) lack of confidence from the way Finch pulls the leash anytime he tries to play aggressively and outside of flow.

He’s gotten really good at using his speed and getting to the rim. I’ve noticed he has stopped playing as flashy and trying to get to spots in the middle of the floor and behind the 3 point line and pulling up. When he’s been at his best, he’s showing off his patience and touch and handles.

I guess it’s good to see he can simplify his game to fit into a role. I just really think his ability to put defenses on their heels is important for the Wolves to have on the floor.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,252
And1: 4,832
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#808 » by minimus » Tue Mar 4, 2025 11:32 am

Better Brandon Jennings?
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,700
And1: 817
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#809 » by Guest84 » Tue Mar 4, 2025 7:53 pm

minimus wrote:Better Brandon Jennings?


No. Could be down the road but not currently. Remember, BJ came out like gang busters but didn't his injury slow him down?
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,700
And1: 817
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#810 » by Guest84 » Tue Mar 4, 2025 7:56 pm

TheZachAttack wrote:
minimus wrote:I have not checked numbers but it looks like Rob's finishing at rim has been improving.


I agree. His jump shot has been off, but I almost feel like it’s a product of (1) a limited role and limited volume (2) lack of confidence from the way Finch pulls the leash anytime he tries to play aggressively and outside of flow.

He’s gotten really good at using his speed and getting to the rim. I’ve noticed he has stopped playing as flashy and trying to get to spots in the middle of the floor and behind the 3 point line and pulling up. When he’s been at his best, he’s showing off his patience and touch and handles.

I guess it’s good to see he can simplify his game to fit into a role. I just really think his ability to put defenses on their heels is important for the Wolves to have on the floor.


While I do believe his limited minutes are affecting his productivity, his shot mechanics are a bit funky. The further away from the basket he is, he flails his legs. Idk if he's trying to draw fouls or simply trying to avoid injury. Could be him trying to generate more power due to a lack strength as well. Just my guess
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,756
And1: 1,300
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#811 » by TheZachAttack » Thu Mar 6, 2025 3:50 am

Guest84 wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:
minimus wrote:I have not checked numbers but it looks like Rob's finishing at rim has been improving.


I agree. His jump shot has been off, but I almost feel like it’s a product of (1) a limited role and limited volume (2) lack of confidence from the way Finch pulls the leash anytime he tries to play aggressively and outside of flow.

He’s gotten really good at using his speed and getting to the rim. I’ve noticed he has stopped playing as flashy and trying to get to spots in the middle of the floor and behind the 3 point line and pulling up. When he’s been at his best, he’s showing off his patience and touch and handles.

I guess it’s good to see he can simplify his game to fit into a role. I just really think his ability to put defenses on their heels is important for the Wolves to have on the floor.


While I do believe his limited minutes are affecting his productivity, his shot mechanics are a bit funky. The further away from the basket he is, he flails his legs. Idk if he's trying to draw fouls or simply trying to avoid injury. Could be him trying to generate more power due to a lack strength as well. Just my guess


He's a shotmaker rather than a pure shooter. I think he might be a little bit streaky, he's definitely a feel player. This is why I think he's better in a higher volume role than a limited one. Similar concept to why Jaden is better when more involved and in a bigger role.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,270
And1: 597
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#812 » by Loaf_of_bread » Thu Mar 6, 2025 4:18 am

TheZachAttack wrote:
Guest84 wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:
I agree. His jump shot has been off, but I almost feel like it’s a product of (1) a limited role and limited volume (2) lack of confidence from the way Finch pulls the leash anytime he tries to play aggressively and outside of flow.

He’s gotten really good at using his speed and getting to the rim. I’ve noticed he has stopped playing as flashy and trying to get to spots in the middle of the floor and behind the 3 point line and pulling up. When he’s been at his best, he’s showing off his patience and touch and handles.

I guess it’s good to see he can simplify his game to fit into a role. I just really think his ability to put defenses on their heels is important for the Wolves to have on the floor.


While I do believe his limited minutes are affecting his productivity, his shot mechanics are a bit funky. The further away from the basket he is, he flails his legs. Idk if he's trying to draw fouls or simply trying to avoid injury. Could be him trying to generate more power due to a lack strength as well. Just my guess


He's a shotmaker rather than a pure shooter. I think he might be a little bit streaky, he's definitely a feel player. This is why I think he's better in a higher volume role than a limited one. Similar concept to why Jaden is better when more involved and in a bigger role.


Well one can't get to a higher volume role without proving themselves first.. unless maybe he plays for the hornets..
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,756
And1: 1,300
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#813 » by TheZachAttack » Thu Mar 6, 2025 4:23 am

Loaf_of_bread wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:
Guest84 wrote:
While I do believe his limited minutes are affecting his productivity, his shot mechanics are a bit funky. The further away from the basket he is, he flails his legs. Idk if he's trying to draw fouls or simply trying to avoid injury. Could be him trying to generate more power due to a lack strength as well. Just my guess


He's a shotmaker rather than a pure shooter. I think he might be a little bit streaky, he's definitely a feel player. This is why I think he's better in a higher volume role than a limited one. Similar concept to why Jaden is better when more involved and in a bigger role.


Well one can't get to a higher volume role without proving themselves first.. unless maybe he plays for the hornets..


I mean he's played pretty well for most of the year. Occasionally he's missed shots and occasionally he's had some bad turnovers, but generally his processing, pace, and 2-man decision making is always really good. The issue is lack of opportunity and a coach who is more comfortable trying to compete with the veteran Conley over some of the rookie moments that come with Dillingham. The probable bigger issue even outside of the rookie moments is just the way in certain games despite him putting a lot of effort he can get overwhelmed defensively. Generally, I think his defense has been better than expected and he will gain strength as he matures -- but this is probably the biggest reason his minutes are small.

I'm not sure we're going to see what we want this season, but I think next season with an offseason of training and the realization about Conley's age/decline we will see a 20+mpg role for Rob next year with Conley assuming the Ingles role.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,270
And1: 597
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#814 » by Loaf_of_bread » Thu Mar 6, 2025 4:32 am

TheZachAttack wrote:
Loaf_of_bread wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:
He's a shotmaker rather than a pure shooter. I think he might be a little bit streaky, he's definitely a feel player. This is why I think he's better in a higher volume role than a limited one. Similar concept to why Jaden is better when more involved and in a bigger role.


Well one can't get to a higher volume role without proving themselves first.. unless maybe he plays for the hornets..


I mean he's played pretty well for most of the year. Occasionally he's missed shots and occasionally he's had some bad turnovers, but generally his processing, pace, and 2-man decision making is always really good. The issue is lack of opportunity and a coach who is more comfortable trying to compete with the veteran Conley over some of the rookie moments that come with Dillingham.

For sure, id like to see him get at least 10 minutes a night. The thought though that a guy cannot get into a rhythm without extended minutes is just goofy though.. got to earn playing time.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,893
And1: 21,623
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#815 » by Klomp » Thu Mar 6, 2025 5:07 am

TheZachAttack wrote:I mean he's played pretty well for most of the year. Occasionally he's missed shots and occasionally he's had some bad turnovers, but generally his processing, pace, and 2-man decision making is always really good.

And the other end of the court?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,756
And1: 1,300
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#816 » by TheZachAttack » Thu Mar 6, 2025 5:11 am

Klomp wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:I mean he's played pretty well for most of the year. Occasionally he's missed shots and occasionally he's had some bad turnovers, but generally his processing, pace, and 2-man decision making is always really good.

And the other end of the court?


I commented on that. My personal opinion is that he does give a lot of effort. He does get overwhelmed though in certain matchups, hunted, and struggles to fight through screens. I would counter and say this version of Mike Conley has the same issues with less of the upside of Rob.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,893
And1: 21,623
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#817 » by Klomp » Thu Mar 6, 2025 5:53 am

TheZachAttack wrote:
Klomp wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:I mean he's played pretty well for most of the year. Occasionally he's missed shots and occasionally he's had some bad turnovers, but generally his processing, pace, and 2-man decision making is always really good.

And the other end of the court?


I commented on that. My personal opinion is that he does give a lot of effort. He does get overwhelmed though in certain matchups, hunted, and struggles to fight through screens. I would counter and say this version of Mike Conley has the same issues with less of the upside of Rob.

So, you are choosing the best of Rob over the worst of Mike. How brave.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,756
And1: 1,300
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#818 » by TheZachAttack » Thu Mar 6, 2025 6:12 am

Klomp wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:
Klomp wrote:And the other end of the court?


I commented on that. My personal opinion is that he does give a lot of effort. He does get overwhelmed though in certain matchups, hunted, and struggles to fight through screens. I would counter and say this version of Mike Conley has the same issues with less of the upside of Rob.

So, you are choosing the best of Rob over the worst of Mike. How brave.


I don't know what this means and I'm not trying to be brave or not brave -- I am just stating my opinion. Yes, my personal opinion is that Rob's upside, speed, rim pressure, and shotmaking is worth switching Conley and Rob's role. Both players have some strength and also flaws. If you'd rather play Conley, good for you. We aren't going to contend in the playoffs playing this version of Mike Conley 20-25 min or more a game. Given Conley's level of play this year, I think choosing to bet on Rob's upside nets you a better chance of becoming a team that takes a step forward from where they are now. I think it's more likely than Conley doing that because he doesn't have much athletism.

If you like Conley over Rob, happy for you. it's pretty clear he will have a role and Rob will not this season. So, you'll get your wish.
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,830
And1: 1,034
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#819 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Thu Mar 6, 2025 9:58 am

Mike is slowing down for sure. but he is still much better than Rob except to attack the rim. Last 18 games he make 40 3 on 80 attempts ( 50%). Rob in the same times on the last 18 games he play, he make 15 3 on 46 (32.6%)... same go for the assists. I am on the side of playing more Rob next year ( 15-18 min par games) but now we try to make a run and we need play making and Mike shoot.
I just hope Finch keep limiting Mike min at 20-24 in the regular season, no B2B, give min to Rob until regular season ended.

At least, i do not understand why many people believe here we have no chance in the PO this year. If all players are near 100% when PO start, we can beat any team.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,041
And1: 30,022
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#820 » by Domejandro » Thu Mar 6, 2025 11:18 am

I do not agree that Rob Dillingham has been a net-positive offensively.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves