Domejandro wrote:Really don't get the excitement to make the team worse by trading D'Angelo Russell for absolute garbage.
I am the guy that concocted the elite take about distribution and guard-play problems five games into the season, but at some point you have to take a step back and consider if making the team substantially worse this season just to preserve a salary slot (that is a garbage-tier expiring) is worthwhile.
I think Minnesota just rolls forward with the team as-is, barring a Naz Reid or (hopefully) Jaylen Nowell trade.
Well, nobody should be traded for “absolute garbage,” but we need to look at DLo plainly, in the spectrum of team needs.
1. Do you want him starting next season next to Ant? I would say no. We have plenty of offense, and we don’t want to take the ball out of his hands to maximize his development. What we need next to Ant is a mid-priced, point of attack defender, who will swing the ball on offense, and can make an occasional open three.
2. Are you going to be able to sign DLo to a reasonable extension as a good sixth man? All signs point to no, with a giant “bet on yourself!” Can we afford to even pay $20 mil for him to be a sixth man? Will our offer be higher than all 29 other teams in free agency, some who would use him as a starter?
I think these two questions virtually guarantees DLo is not on the roster at the start of next season. The question becomes, do we trade him, or lose him for nothing? The second option is an even worse option, because we lose that matching component.








