ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,528
And1: 6,449
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#961 » by KGdaBom » Sat Jul 5, 2025 2:28 pm

shrink wrote:While Randle might be our most tradeable piece, I think people underestimate how much value there is that Randle wants to be here, when the random players we put into trade proposals might not.

That's a great point...........................

On top of your head. :lol: :rofl:
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,223
And1: 1,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#962 » by Note30 » Sat Jul 5, 2025 10:54 pm

MN7725 wrote:
Note30 wrote:Can we still do a S&T at all this off-season?


can do sign/trade up until day the season/games start


Why aren't we doing a S&T for Giddey then?

DDV and Conley for Giddey.

If we get Beal to sign with us then we just became a way better team than last year?

Giddey/ Dillingham/ Clark
Edwards/Beal
McDaniels/TSJ
Randle/Reid
Gobert/Beringer
MN7725
Veteran
Posts: 2,974
And1: 1,287
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#963 » by MN7725 » Sat Jul 5, 2025 11:56 pm

Note30 wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
Note30 wrote:Can we still do a S&T at all this off-season?


can do sign/trade up until day the season/games start


Why aren't we doing a S&T for Giddey then?

DDV and Conley for Giddey.

If we get Beal to sign with us then we just became a way better team than last year?

Giddey/ Dillingham/ Clark
Edwards/Beal
McDaniels/TSJ
Randle/Reid
Gobert/Beringer


Giddey is a RFA, Bulls have right to match any offer
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,836
And1: 2,672
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#964 » by younggunsmn » Sun Jul 6, 2025 12:02 am

shrink wrote:While Randle might be our most tradeable piece, I think people underestimate how much value there is that Randle wants to be here, when the random players we put into trade proposals might not.


I think Julius has about 100 million reasons to like it here that werent coming from any other team this summer.

But the point about this not being the first choice for players potentially being traded here is valid.
It certainly wasn't for Dante.

We kinda just kidnap players here when we draft or trade for them and hope they develop stockholm syndrome.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,528
And1: 6,449
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#965 » by KGdaBom » Sun Jul 6, 2025 12:14 am

Note30 wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
Note30 wrote:Can we still do a S&T at all this off-season?


can do sign/trade up until day the season/games start


Why aren't we doing a S&T for Giddey then?

DDV and Conley for Giddey.

If we get Beal to sign with us then we just became a way better team than last year?

Giddey/ Dillingham/ Clark
Edwards/Beal
McDaniels/TSJ
Randle/Reid
Gobert/Beringer

Nothing came of Giddey's relationship with the girl of indeterminate age?
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,537
And1: 30,974
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#966 » by Domejandro » Sun Jul 6, 2025 1:23 am

KGdaBom wrote:
Note30 wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
can do sign/trade up until day the season/games start


Why aren't we doing a S&T for Giddey then?

DDV and Conley for Giddey.

If we get Beal to sign with us then we just became a way better team than last year?

Giddey/ Dillingham/ Clark
Edwards/Beal
McDaniels/TSJ
Randle/Reid
Gobert/Beringer

Nothing came of Giddey's relationship with the girl of indeterminate age?

The TL;DR is that he met her at a club and didn’t consider checking ID because of the environment. It was irresponsible of him (we don’t know the details beyond that, it could be really bad or an honest **** up), but nothing came of it legally. Investigations by both the police and the NBA are long closed.

Not commenting on it beyond that, but those are the baseline facts from the limited amount that we know.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,223
And1: 1,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#967 » by Note30 » Sun Jul 6, 2025 1:29 am

KGdaBom wrote:
Note30 wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
can do sign/trade up until day the season/games start


Why aren't we doing a S&T for Giddey then?

DDV and Conley for Giddey.

If we get Beal to sign with us then we just became a way better team than last year?

Giddey/ Dillingham/ Clark
Edwards/Beal
McDaniels/TSJ
Randle/Reid
Gobert/Beringer

Nothing came of Giddey's relationship with the girl of indeterminate age?


He wouldn't be in the NBA Id think if that was the case.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,223
And1: 1,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#968 » by Note30 » Sun Jul 6, 2025 1:32 am

MN7725 wrote:
Note30 wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
can do sign/trade up until day the season/games start


Why aren't we doing a S&T for Giddey then?

DDV and Conley for Giddey.

If we get Beal to sign with us then we just became a way better team than last year?

Giddey/ Dillingham/ Clark
Edwards/Beal
McDaniels/TSJ
Randle/Reid
Gobert/Beringer


Giddey is a RFA, Bulls have right to match any offer



Hence a sign and trade.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,428
And1: 679
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#969 » by Loaf_of_bread » Sun Jul 6, 2025 1:33 am

Giddy mention should be grounds for insta-ban.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,223
And1: 1,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#970 » by Note30 » Sun Jul 6, 2025 1:53 am

Loaf_of_bread wrote:Giddy mention should be grounds for insta-ban.


He's a good player and a PG what's your beef?
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,537
And1: 30,974
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#971 » by Domejandro » Sun Jul 6, 2025 3:00 am

If he picked up his Qualifying Offer and there was an ugly trade demand situation, Minnesota should absolutely reach out. He would be an extraordinary fit on this roster. That said, in reality, both sides are just playing hardball, and something will get worked out between the two parties.

Regardless, Minnesota can't financially do a sign-and-trade, within reason. They would be hard-capped at the First Apron, which isn't happening.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,744
And1: 1,965
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#972 » by jpatrick » Sun Jul 6, 2025 3:10 am

Note30 wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
Note30 wrote:
Why aren't we doing a S&T for Giddey then?

DDV and Conley for Giddey.

If we get Beal to sign with us then we just became a way better team than last year?

Giddey/ Dillingham/ Clark
Edwards/Beal
McDaniels/TSJ
Randle/Reid
Gobert/Beringer


Giddey is a RFA, Bulls have right to match any offer



Hence a sign and trade.


Giddey is someone that needs to play with the ball in his hands to be effective. In OKC, he was flat out benched because he was so poor playing off the ball, which would be his role here. And he’s not terrible, but if he’s your primary initiator, you’re not winning anything. Plus, we are not paying him 30m. I don’t think anyone is offering him 30m.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,154
And1: 3,106
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#973 » by TimberKat » Sun Jul 6, 2025 3:55 am

younggunsmn wrote:
shrink wrote:While Randle might be our most tradeable piece, I think people underestimate how much value there is that Randle wants to be here, when the random players we put into trade proposals might not.


I think Julius has about 100 million reasons to like it here that werent coming from any other team this summer.

But the point about this not being the first choice for players potentially being traded here is valid.
It certainly wasn't for Dante.

We kinda just kidnap players here when we draft or trade for them and hope they develop stockholm syndrome.

When the finally develope Stockholm syndrome, we release them to the wild (aka Towns).
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,428
And1: 679
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#974 » by Loaf_of_bread » Sun Jul 6, 2025 4:04 am

Note30 wrote:
Loaf_of_bread wrote:Giddy mention should be grounds for insta-ban.


He's a good player and a PG what's your beef?


Dude is an unreliable 3pt shooter... so much so he can be a HUGE liability in the playoffs. While he has improved his shot, we pretty much singled him out so much so that okc couldn't play him against us.

Dude has ZERO PLAYOFF experience. Plays for a crappy team.

Also, is considered decent now. If regular season play is of importance, ok, JGiddey is a good nba player with modest potential. I just don't like him as a playoff player.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,419
And1: 5,959
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#975 » by winforlose » Sun Jul 6, 2025 4:06 am

TimberKat wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
shrink wrote:While Randle might be our most tradeable piece, I think people underestimate how much value there is that Randle wants to be here, when the random players we put into trade proposals might not.


I think Julius has about 100 million reasons to like it here that werent coming from any other team this summer.

But the point about this not being the first choice for players potentially being traded here is valid.
It certainly wasn't for Dante.

We kinda just kidnap players here when we draft or trade for them and hope they develop stockholm syndrome.

When the finally develope Stockholm syndrome, we release them to the wild (aka Towns).


Tell that to Mike Conley or NAW. Mike had been to exactly one WCF in his entire career before being a Wolf. He made the playoffs all 3 years with us and two of those were WCF finals appearances. If he can stay active even as a third string he might win a ring here. NAW’s career was on life support in Utah. Now he just got paid 4/62 or 15.5 million per year. It isn’t all bad here.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,223
And1: 1,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#976 » by Note30 » Sun Jul 6, 2025 5:01 am

Loaf_of_bread wrote:
Note30 wrote:
Loaf_of_bread wrote:Giddy mention should be grounds for insta-ban.


He's a good player and a PG what's your beef?


Dude is an unreliable 3pt shooter... so much so he can be a HUGE liability in the playoffs. While he has improved his shot, we pretty much singled him out so much so that okc couldn't play him against us.

Dude has ZERO PLAYOFF experience. Plays for a crappy team.

Also, is considered decent now. If regular season play is of importance, ok, JGiddey is a good nba player with modest potential. I just don't like him as a playoff player.


He hasn't been on OKC for a year. And his fit for OKC wasn't the best.

I don't think he's worth a $30M price tag. $22M tho? For just DDV and Conley?

We need a starting PG. He's tall, can facilitate, and is an improving player.

We're not gonna get a long term solution there easy.
Now maybe Dillingham turns out to be amazing.

But we're still sometime from it happening.

Is he the answer? I don't know, but we can't have a hole at PG. Its a really important position.

So it's at least worth a discussion. Esp if that convinces Beal to sign here. I think that's actually a squad that can beat OKC next year.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,419
And1: 5,959
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#977 » by winforlose » Sun Jul 6, 2025 6:51 am

Note30 wrote:
Loaf_of_bread wrote:
Note30 wrote:
He's a good player and a PG what's your beef?


Dude is an unreliable 3pt shooter... so much so he can be a HUGE liability in the playoffs. While he has improved his shot, we pretty much singled him out so much so that okc couldn't play him against us.

Dude has ZERO PLAYOFF experience. Plays for a crappy team.

Also, is considered decent now. If regular season play is of importance, ok, JGiddey is a good nba player with modest potential. I just don't like him as a playoff player.


He hasn't been on OKC for a year. And his fit for OKC wasn't the best.

I don't think he's worth a $30M price tag. $22M tho? For just DDV and Conley?

We need a starting PG. He's tall, can facilitate, and is an improving player.

We're not gonna get a long term solution there easy.
Now maybe Dillingham turns out to be amazing.

But we're still sometime from it happening.

Is he the answer? I don't know, but we can't have a hole at PG. Its a really important position.

So it's at least worth a discussion. Esp if that convinces Beal to sign here. I think that's actually a squad that can beat OKC next year.


Putting aside the non basketball problems with Giddey, we literally cannot make that trade. To accept a player via sign and trade triggers a hardcap at the first apron, and we have too much salary to accept that. I did the math and excluding Joan (whose salary I don’t know off hand,) and excluding Mike and DDV we are paying $173,127,688 to 10 players (again no Joan, Mike, DDV.) The first apron max is $195,945,000. So we need 4 more players and have $22,817,311.99 to do it with. The math doesn’t work.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,577
And1: 19,693
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#978 » by shrink » Sun Jul 6, 2025 2:42 pm

winforlose wrote:
TimberKat wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:We kinda just kidnap players here when we draft or trade for them and hope they develop stockholm syndrome.

When they finally develop Stockholm syndrome, we release them to the wild (aka Towns).

Tell that to Mike Conley or NAW. Mike had been to exactly one WCF in his entire career before being a Wolf. He made the playoffs all 3 years with us and two of those were WCF finals appearances. If he can stay active even as a third string he might win a ring here. NAW’s career was on life support in Utah. Now he just got paid 4/62 or 15.5 million per year. It isn’t all bad here.
younggunsmn is right. For most of our existence, no free agent wanted to come here. There are some players that want rings, some that want competent coaching or front office, and some that buys into the national hype that Minnesota is in northern Alaska, because the only time they’ve been here is on cold February nights. Our best free agent signing was Kyle Anderson - that’s horrible. Even in the KG era, MIN needed to overpay, or make contracts overly long, to even have mediocre talent like Troy Hudson. Front offices have been wise to not be a cap space team, because we can’t lure top players here in free agency.

I wonder though if things are changing now, as the Wolves have achieved a level of competency and success with Finch. In the past, YGMN is right, once players have been on the team, many want to stay .. but these players always wanted expensive contracts. That hasn’t been the case lately. While Naz and Randle got paid this season, many of the previous deals were under-market because the player actually wanted to be here! Naz rejected free agency two years ago. NAW liked having a role here. Gobert took a pay cut to add years. Jaden’s deal is likely a little cheap, he wanted the extra years here. Even Ant, who could have done any deal, (I expected the traditional superstar deal of three years and a player option on year 4), Ant chose a five year deal with no player option. For the first time in franchise history, our players are willing to sacrifice a little to be a Timberwolf.

I am curious if this change will be reflected in free agency. By most metrics, MIN might be a good place to go for a player that wants to compete in the playoffs. The team will get national spotlight, which might attract a player that wants to showcase himself for the next deal. And there are clear team needs that a player could help with. Would this attract a player of the caliber of a Chris Paul, a Dame Lillard, or a Bradley Beal? It never would have before, but for the first time ever, it isn’t a ridiculous notion.
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,426
And1: 881
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#979 » by Norseman79 » Sun Jul 6, 2025 3:31 pm

I still think figuring out a way to move Randle for Dejounte Murray and fill is the right route.

MN out: Randle
In: Murray and draft picks

Pho in: Randle, H Jones
Out: Beal

NO: in Beal
Out: Murray, Jones, draft picks

PG - Murray, Conley, Dilly
SG - Edwards, DD, Clark
SF - McDaniels, TSJ, Ingles
PF - Reid, Miller, vet min FA
C - Gobert, Beringer, Rocco
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,528
And1: 6,449
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#980 » by KGdaBom » Sun Jul 6, 2025 4:09 pm

Norseman79 wrote:I still think figuring out a way to move Randle for Dejounte Murray and fill is the right route.

MN out: Randle
In: Murray and draft picks

Pho in: Randle, H Jones
Out: Beal

NO: in Beal
Out: Murray, Jones, draft picks

PG - Murray, Conley, Dilly
SG - Edwards, DD, Clark
SF - McDaniels, TSJ, Ingles
PF - Reid, Miller, vet min FA
C - Gobert, Beringer, Rocco

Last I checked Dejounte was a better player than Randle so I wouldn't expect us to get him plus draft picks. Maybe his game declined in the last year or two. I'd be happy to have him if he's the player I remember.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves