Lottery Pick Demand for Visiting Posters
Posted: Wed Jun 9, 2010 9:34 pm
With all of the discussion on pick trades over the last few weeks, I thought I'd write a bit about what my personal usage demand is for the top lottery picks. For fans of other teams, I just wanted to give you an idea of what's valuable here, and why.
MIN's biggest need isn't about position or physical characteristics .. its for a potential franchise player. At this point in time, the Wolves are unlikely to be able to acquire one right now in free agency or through trade (if we hope to retain him long). If we're going to find one, we need to get players that have the potential - even if its unlikely -of becoming that player. If we used a vague 10-point $ scale to show gaps
PICKS
#1 .. $10 .. John Wall .. clearly more valuable than any player
#2 .. $8.5 .. Evan Turner .. an obvious #2 pick, and a terrific fit for what we want to do.
#3-4 .. $7.0 .. DeMarcus Cousins/Derek Favors .. both have great physical ability with varying degrees of polish. Neither is a great fit for us right now, but we are likely to trade Jefferson or Love, or other big men to make room.
#5 .. $5.0 .. Wes Johnson .. Nowhere near the upside of the top 4, but he'd still be a significantly better fit for us.
#6 and lower .. $3.0 and worse ... Everyone Else There are certainly some decent players outside the Top 5, but I would not trade even two #6's for the #4, and the chance Cousin's upside could help this team for many years.
OTHER PLAYERS:
Let me also name a few players that are often mentioned, and slide them into the thread:
$9.0 Ricky Rubio. David Kahn has linked his career to Rubio, calling him such things as a "transformational" player, and comparing him to Pistol Pete Maravich. He embodies a high ceiling, which is what MIN urgently needs, despite the risk. And of course, with such a high personal value to the Wolves, he's basically untradable, because no GM could make a reasonable trade at this level of value.
$6.5 Kevin Love. He's the NBA's best RB/MIN guy, two years running and he's just a boy.
$6.0 Anthony Randolph. He carries the upside MIN needs, but compared to picks, he's had two years to show more, and even if he does, he's two years closer to getting paid
$5.5 Al Jefferson. Exceptional rebounder and exceptional low post scorer, but higher price. I expect his trade value to increase by the deadline, two years from injury risks, so I'd prefer to hold off on trading him low. Additional return depends on how the salary gap is handled between a cheap pick and Al.
IMPLICATIONS FOR OTHER TEAMS:
SAC #5: The #5 pick is probably more valuable to MIN than to SAC, since the Kings have a couple decent options at the 3 already in Casspi and Donta Green. Getting the 5 is valuable to the Wolves because it jumps in front of GSW, who might take Johnson if he's on the board at #6. This might make for a good chance to trade down, because SAC may get additional value, and still be able to select the same guy they would have picked at #5. Jefferson + #23 for Nocioni (2 yr) + #5 + cap space may make some sense to some, though others have cooled on it.
GSW #6: GSW would like to move up, but the pick doesn't have as much value as the #4 (with real upside) or #5, in case SAC takes Turner. There are a lot of different ways GSW can go with the #6, so if they can't move up, it may make sense to move down a pick or two and recoup additional value. There are a lot of combinations both ways, and its one of thereasons I made this post.
DET #7: We've discussed the #7 for two months, though some on both sides are cooling to the Jefferson for #7 + Prince deal. It makes some sense for both sides, in an imperfect way. DET could certainly use a great low post scorer, great rebounder with defensive flaws, and it would definitiely improve the team. MIN probably can't get one of the players they want with the #7 (Johnson), but it makes a decent asset to put in a trade. Both sides have options to wiggle the trade value, which would help in three-team trades.
MIN's biggest need isn't about position or physical characteristics .. its for a potential franchise player. At this point in time, the Wolves are unlikely to be able to acquire one right now in free agency or through trade (if we hope to retain him long). If we're going to find one, we need to get players that have the potential - even if its unlikely -of becoming that player. If we used a vague 10-point $ scale to show gaps
PICKS
#1 .. $10 .. John Wall .. clearly more valuable than any player
#2 .. $8.5 .. Evan Turner .. an obvious #2 pick, and a terrific fit for what we want to do.
#3-4 .. $7.0 .. DeMarcus Cousins/Derek Favors .. both have great physical ability with varying degrees of polish. Neither is a great fit for us right now, but we are likely to trade Jefferson or Love, or other big men to make room.
#5 .. $5.0 .. Wes Johnson .. Nowhere near the upside of the top 4, but he'd still be a significantly better fit for us.
#6 and lower .. $3.0 and worse ... Everyone Else There are certainly some decent players outside the Top 5, but I would not trade even two #6's for the #4, and the chance Cousin's upside could help this team for many years.
OTHER PLAYERS:
Let me also name a few players that are often mentioned, and slide them into the thread:
$9.0 Ricky Rubio. David Kahn has linked his career to Rubio, calling him such things as a "transformational" player, and comparing him to Pistol Pete Maravich. He embodies a high ceiling, which is what MIN urgently needs, despite the risk. And of course, with such a high personal value to the Wolves, he's basically untradable, because no GM could make a reasonable trade at this level of value.
$6.5 Kevin Love. He's the NBA's best RB/MIN guy, two years running and he's just a boy.
$6.0 Anthony Randolph. He carries the upside MIN needs, but compared to picks, he's had two years to show more, and even if he does, he's two years closer to getting paid
$5.5 Al Jefferson. Exceptional rebounder and exceptional low post scorer, but higher price. I expect his trade value to increase by the deadline, two years from injury risks, so I'd prefer to hold off on trading him low. Additional return depends on how the salary gap is handled between a cheap pick and Al.
IMPLICATIONS FOR OTHER TEAMS:
SAC #5: The #5 pick is probably more valuable to MIN than to SAC, since the Kings have a couple decent options at the 3 already in Casspi and Donta Green. Getting the 5 is valuable to the Wolves because it jumps in front of GSW, who might take Johnson if he's on the board at #6. This might make for a good chance to trade down, because SAC may get additional value, and still be able to select the same guy they would have picked at #5. Jefferson + #23 for Nocioni (2 yr) + #5 + cap space may make some sense to some, though others have cooled on it.
GSW #6: GSW would like to move up, but the pick doesn't have as much value as the #4 (with real upside) or #5, in case SAC takes Turner. There are a lot of different ways GSW can go with the #6, so if they can't move up, it may make sense to move down a pick or two and recoup additional value. There are a lot of combinations both ways, and its one of thereasons I made this post.
DET #7: We've discussed the #7 for two months, though some on both sides are cooling to the Jefferson for #7 + Prince deal. It makes some sense for both sides, in an imperfect way. DET could certainly use a great low post scorer, great rebounder with defensive flaws, and it would definitiely improve the team. MIN probably can't get one of the players they want with the #7 (Johnson), but it makes a decent asset to put in a trade. Both sides have options to wiggle the trade value, which would help in three-team trades.