Old story, want new input.
Do the Wolves want to take a flier on Michael Beasley? Something to the effect of Beasley + #18 for Gomes. Miami does it to save cap space by waving Gomes, but do we want to give Beasley a chance?
We already do have too many PF's, but what if one of Love/Jefferson is gone and Pekovic is used as sweetener to move up in the draft? Hollins is a waste. We cold re-sign Darko. We could draft Cousins.
What I am really asking is, "if we only have two of the good players (not Hollins) above left, should we bring Beasley in to be a 4/3 coming off the bench as our third big?"
Most people focus on all of the baggage, but I am inclined towards optimism. No real reason, but I think this is something that should be considered.
Another Reclamation Project?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Another Reclamation Project?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 157
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 01, 2010
Re: Another Reclamation Project?
- PeeDee
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,895
- And1: 85
- Joined: Dec 30, 2007
Re: Another Reclamation Project?
This has been discussed at length before. Most of us think it's worth a shot if the price is minimal. A 15 win team in a smaller market needs to take risks like this.
Re: Another Reclamation Project?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,764
- And1: 22,341
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Another Reclamation Project?
This topic has been beat to death. Sorry.
-Klomp
-Klomp
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves