RealGM

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=0w7D6Zr ... re=related

Just thought it was interesting because they do look like brothers and ive see his stock rise on alot of mocks maybe u guys can take him with one of ur 2nd's.

I don't see the point of adding Tiny Gallon as long as Al and Love are on the team. He won't get much PT here.

And it's not like Tiny Gallon is a player that complements Al and Love very well.

pretty sure they are cousins

jade_hippo wrote:pretty sure they are cousins

And we need cousins!

shrink wrote:

jade_hippo wrote:pretty sure they are cousins

And we need cousins!

Touche.

They look like Twins...

Not sure we would draft him just to be with his cousin, especially when his cousin might be traded.

If they look like twins, we could made them switch Jerseys and start Tiny, then when the other guy is like "Dang, Al got soft, he's playing like a turd", then we put in the real Al and he owns with the element of suprise.

Better yet, we sign him. Then behind the scenes Al gives him his number and starting position. We find a great deal that involves Al in a trade and upon completion we send them Tiny. They are never the wiser. OWNED!

Calinks wrote:Better yet, we sign him. Then behind the scenes Al gives him his number and starting position. We find a great deal that involves Al in a trade and upon completion we send them Tiny. They are never the wiser. OWNED!

These guys tried something similar, it was a little messy...

Are you f-en racist? So now you say all black people looks tha same? Just becuase dey black dey look da same to you people, whats wrong wit chu?

endlessraine wrote:Are you f-en racist? So now you say all black people looks tha same? Just becuase dey black dey look da same to you people, whats wrong wit chu?

If you are going to pull the race card, you should at least not talk out of your ***. Tiny and Big Al DO look similar (not identical) because they are related. Your claim of racism is idiotic.

I can't remember if I've laid this bit of science on you guys. I always found it interesting, so I talk about it often.

Every human is born with an ability to recognize facial markers to identify unique people. In our social development, it was important to be able to tell whether another human was a friend, enemy, etc, as well as try to identify his intentions by facial markers (happy, angry, etc). This identification is innate in each of our brains.

Scientists have identified 40-60 facial markers, like the shape of the eye, length of the nose, etc, that humans use for recognition. Each of us uses only about 15-20 .. I mean, how many does your brain need to process before you are pretty sure that woman in the picture is Angelina Jolie? However, the interesting thing is that each person's brain uses their own 15-20. If theones your brain is using is the same as a friend's, you may agree that two people look similar. you tell a third person, who's using different markers, and he'd say "I can't believe you think those two are even close to looking alike!"

Now, when someone says, "You're racist if you think two black people look alike," that's hard to assign blame. Within a race, there may be some markers that are more similar than between races, and if your brain was born locking into those specific markers (not a choice), two specific black guys (or white guys, or whoever), may look similar to you. It isn't a perjorative, racist attitude here, but its population genetics, and brain function that produce some of this perception.