RealGM

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2010 ... id=5315275

Obviosly wrong, but we better not trade 16 for two late picks

Yea this is terrible if true.. just have to see what else Kahn is doing

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2010/news/story?id=5315275

first off, lol @ the misreporting.

Second off, something doesn't seem right with Kahn's philosophy and trading the 16 for 25 and 28. Why would the Wolves want to do that?

EDIT: sorry for the duplicate, go ahead and delete.

I like it for the Wolves. There isn't a huge difference between a guy you could get at #16 vs someone at #28.

That's a head scratcher. Maybe we're trading up to 12 though?

Yeah, something doesn't seem right with this.

DrugBust wrote:I like it for the Wolves. There isn't a huge difference between a guy you could get at #16 vs someone at #28.

It would give us three picks in the 20's, which makes no sense.

DrugBust wrote:I like it for the Wolves. There isn't a huge difference between a guy you could get at #16 vs someone at #28.

Even if you believe that, the Wolves don't need more picks.

Yea I hope those are more bargaining chips for trades to come.

If we plan to take players there and NOT trade up for George or Henry, I'll really be pissed at this trade

I have never been this confused before a draft EVER!

then we can trade them all for 3 million a pop, everybody wins. By everybody I mean Glen Taylor.

KAHHHHHN!!!

He's working everyone up in a tizzy.

so 12 for 16 and 23?

I really want to know what else we could possibly be linked to in the next few days. Someone has declared a rumor bombing on us.

Worm Guts wrote:

DrugBust wrote:I like it for the Wolves. There isn't a huge difference between a guy you could get at #16 vs someone at #28.

Even if you believe that, the Wolves don't need more picks.

Then give 'em to us and take the #15.

wildvikeswolves wrote:so 12 for 16 and 23?

Yeah, but why would Memphis want picks 16, 23, 25, and 28?

wildvikeswolves wrote:so 12 for 16 and 23?

That's the only Memphis-Minnesota pick swap deal that would make sense to me. Combine our picks to move up for Paul George.

The deal reported doesn't make any sense at all.

wildvikeswolves wrote:so 12 for 16 and 23?

That'd make more sense. Maybe this reporter is high and just got confused with the picks but had the trading up on our part right. #12 would put us ahead of Houston, Milwaukee, and Toronto who may take George or Henry.

If it's 16 for 25 and 28 I'll be very confused. Atleast if we had stayed at 16 we'd have a shot at George or Henry but with 23, 25 and 28 I'm just not sure what they would be thinking.

Kahn promised he will not sell any picks at the favors workout