Page 1 of 1

Series of trades with IND/PHI/SAC/POR on draft night

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:00 pm
by simsev23
Trade Number 1
ind/phi/mn
ind gives 10, ford
ind gets Sessions, Gomes, 45, 56

min gives 4, Gomes, Sessions, 16, 45, 56
min gets 2, 10, Brand

phi gives 2, Brand
phi gets 4, 16

Trade Number 2
sac/mn
sac gives 5
sac gets jefferson or love, 23
min gives Jefferson or love, 23
mn gets 5

Trade Number 3
mn/por
mn gives pekoic
mn gets fernandez

por gives pekovic
por gets fernandez

Wolves draft Turner at 2, DMC at 5, George at 10
Lineup for 2010
Flynn (Rubio in future)
Turner Fernandez
Brewer George
Love or Jefferson Brand
Milic DMC

Lineup is great for the future. Have Rubio and Flynn at pg.
Turner with his solid offense and star potential at 2, with rudy adding shooting sparks off bench.
George and Brewer, which are athletic, george can shoot too.
Love or Jefferson, don't really care but jefferson could add more scoring than love. All depends on the value we get. Also Brand would not really step on floor.
Milicic and his hook shot at center, with DMC getting lots of minute to.

Also Brands contract wouldn't be such a big nightmare as most people thought. The next two years we don't need a free agent because our players would develop. And after two years in the summer we could trade elton brand and his 18 million expiring for another star player. Perhaps a sign and trade. With this plan and so much potential, in 3 years we could be a high caliber championship team.

Also the Salaries for the first trade probably wouldn't match up but there could be some fillers.

Re: Series of trades with IND/PHI/SAC/POR on draft night

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:12 pm
by Krapinsky
Please spare us

Re: Series of trades with IND/PHI/SAC/POR on draft night

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:41 pm
by Wolves Rube
It's amazing how many threads have the same, tired trade ideas. I've read this board (seldom post) for the last two years daily. I don't recall seeing so many retread ideas in the past... Is my memory failing me?

Re: Series of trades with IND/PHI/SAC/POR on draft night

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:03 pm
by moss_is_1
Brand is a no go. We aren't taking him. If we could get 10 and 2 with only really giving up #4, #16 and Sessions then its tempting, but Brand kills our flexibility.