Page 1 of 1
MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:18 am
by shrink
Gotta run tonight, but I wanted to throw this one up on the boards.
MIN GIVES: Sessions + Brewer
MIN GETS: Dampier + (George? or IND future 1st?)
IND GIVES: TJ Ford + Foster + (George? or IND future 1st?)
IND GETS: Sessions + Brewer + cap space + Nazr Mohammed
CHA GIVES: Nazr Mohammed
CHA GETS: TJ Ford
DAL GIVES: Dampier's DUST Chip
DAL GETS : Foster
I'm not a fan of four-teamers, but I'm trying to move assets where they'd have more value.
MIN gets some youth and raw cap space.
IND solves its PG problem, gets rid of TJ Ford, and gets room under the lux.
CHA swaps overpaid players for one that fits their need for a PG
DAL gets a vet eran big to try to stop the Lakers front court.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:30 am
by Devilzsidewalk
If it means the difference between getting a big name player or not, then yes, but I don't really want to dump them just to hope that something comes along later
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:42 am
by Indy2thaWindy
Indiana is full of wings. Sessions ain't worth a 1st rounder let alone a top 10 pick.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:48 am
by Casperkid23
CHA has Dampier from the Chandler trade.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:16 am
by moss_is_1
I don't really want to give up Brewer, just to clear more capspace. We already have what like 13 million?
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:35 am
by funkatron101
I think if Indy was interested in trading George for a package like this, they would have done so on draft night.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:19 am
by JasonL
im not a fan of giving up brewer for nothing. i think he's quite a valuable defender and still growing on offense.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:52 am
by Mr Dew
Dude, you gotta check the facts before you just throw scenarios out there... Dampier was traded from Dallas to Charlotte a day or two ago. I'm usually opposed to the Mods locking threads, but if ever there was a reason, this has to be it.

Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:28 am
by [RCG]
I think, therefore I am.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:43 am
by shrink
We would not have the minutes for Brewer if we added Paul George to Webster and Wesley Johnson, and we hope to have Beasley play some minutes at SF. He's on the 1-year "Foye-plan" for trading. Paul George or the 1st would not be giving up Brewer for nothing - and Sessions would not be worth either alone.
As for DAL, I guess I need another team that needs a big man to compete with the Lakers, and would value Foster highly. I think only the Jazz and Mavs have risen to that challenge.
As for double-checking .. you're right, but like I said, I was in a rush to get this posted before I left for the evening, and I wanted to give people a chance to look it over. Maybe CHA would like to use the Dampier exception themselves, since they lost Tyson Chandler?
I'll go edit, after I check my numbers.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:46 pm
by minnisisky
dont think IND does this. im down though.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:18 pm
by Charlottehoops
There are rumours floating around that Charlotte has contacted Minnesota about Sessions. I am a fan of Sessions. Tell me how we can reasonably make Ramon a Bobcat.
Re: MIN-IND-CHA-DAL
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:24 pm
by funkatron101
Charlottehoops wrote:There are rumours floating around that Charlotte has contacted Minnesota about Sessions. I am a fan of Sessions. Tell me how we can reasonably make Ramon a Bobcat.
TPE or 2nd round I think