ImageImageImage

PGs

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

minnisisky
Freshman
Posts: 65
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010

PGs 

Post#1 » by minnisisky » Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:40 am

What is everyone's opinion on what to do with our PG situation?

I say, keep Flynn and Luke. Get rid of Sessions.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: PGs 

Post#2 » by moss_is_1 » Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:41 am

Well...duh? Why would we have signed Ridnour just to trade him? Flynn isn't going to leave because of Kahn's hardon for him.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: PGs 

Post#3 » by Esohny » Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:49 am

moss_is_1 wrote:Well...duh? Why would we have signed Ridnour just to trade him? Flynn isn't going to leave because of Kahn's hardon for him.


Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if Flynn and Sessions were both gone and Rubio and Ridnour were the PG rotation next season.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: PGs 

Post#4 » by C.lupus » Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:50 am

Esohny wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:Well...duh? Why would we have signed Ridnour just to trade him? Flynn isn't going to leave because of Kahn's hardon for him.


Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if Flynn and Sessions were both gone and Rubio and Ridnour were the PG rotation next season.

yes please.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: PGs 

Post#5 » by Krapinsky » Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:12 am

I have high aspirations for Flynn still and I want to avoid moving him at all costs. If he for some reason regresses this year, which I doubt, then my opinion would change.

However, I wonder with Al gone and increased ball movement that will result whether we can get away with a Flynn/Rubio backcourt for significant stretches.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
minnisisky
Freshman
Posts: 65
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010

Re: PGs 

Post#6 » by minnisisky » Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:12 am

i am really impressed with Flynn as well. i mean we only gave him one season and he had a lot of weight thrown on him in that season. i think that there is much to come from him.
User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

Re: PGs 

Post#7 » by prefuse73 » Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:45 am

We are going to keep all three until Flynn is healthy, which at that point, I think its fairly obvious that Sessions is out the door. Flynn will get this year to show us what he can do and simultaneously raise his trade value. They will play some stretches with Flynn operating as the SG on offense with Ridnour running the point to see how it works. If Flynn impresses, he stays, if not, he will be traded once Rubio lands in Minnesota with a signed contract to play the 2011 season.

I love Flynn, but I think Ridnour is the guy they brought in to be a strong veteran backup for Rubio.
User avatar
Breakdown777
Veteran
Posts: 2,759
And1: 47
Joined: Sep 17, 2009
Location: MN

Re: PGs 

Post#8 » by Breakdown777 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:49 am

Everyone knows that Kahn wants a line up of all PGs, we have sooooo many! let's just keep them all!


Seriously though, I still have hopes Flynn can be a dynamic combo off the bench ala Jason Terry (only more of a PG than a SG-where i'd have Terry as more of a SG than PG). Also, I want to see the "Orange Connection" in action because I think they'll have great chemistry.
"Llevaré mi talento a Minnesota".
User avatar
Mikchek
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,783
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Contact:

Re: PGs 

Post#9 » by Mikchek » Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:01 am

I like sessions better than Flynn...I think he has skills....I honestly don't know why we just signed Luke without trading a PG first...
User avatar
CoolKids
RealGM
Posts: 14,447
And1: 2,650
Joined: Feb 17, 2009
Location: The Bronx
     

Re: PGs 

Post#10 » by CoolKids » Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:22 am

shouldnt you worry about these kind of things when rubio actually signs with you..
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: PGs 

Post#11 » by shangrila » Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:06 pm

CoolKids wrote:shouldnt you worry about these kind of things when rubio actually signs with you..

this is ironic when you think about it
User avatar
dookieguy
Veteran
Posts: 2,552
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 16, 2008

Re: PGs 

Post#12 » by dookieguy » Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:04 pm

Where would Flynn go? Don't see Minnesota getting great value for him..
Image
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: PGs 

Post#13 » by skorff26 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:04 pm

dookieguy wrote:Where would Flynn go? Don't see Minnesota getting great value for him..

Maybe Indiana for Paul George
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: PGs 

Post#14 » by Esohny » Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:20 pm

skorff26 wrote:
dookieguy wrote:Where would Flynn go? Don't see Minnesota getting great value for him..

Maybe Indiana for Paul George


Sadly, that ship has probably sailed. Much to my disappointment.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
minnisisky
Freshman
Posts: 65
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010

Re: PGs 

Post#15 » by minnisisky » Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:11 pm

Mikchek wrote:I like sessions better than Flynn...I think he has skills....I honestly don't know why we just signed Luke without trading a PG first...


that is easily the dumbest thing i have heard all month..

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves