RealGM

What is everyone's opinion on what to do with our PG situation?

I say, keep Flynn and Luke. Get rid of Sessions.

Well...duh? Why would we have signed Ridnour just to trade him? Flynn isn't going to leave because of Kahn's hardon for him.

moss_is_1 wrote:Well...duh? Why would we have signed Ridnour just to trade him? Flynn isn't going to leave because of Kahn's hardon for him.

Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if Flynn and Sessions were both gone and Rubio and Ridnour were the PG rotation next season.

Esohny wrote:

moss_is_1 wrote:Well...duh? Why would we have signed Ridnour just to trade him? Flynn isn't going to leave because of Kahn's hardon for him.

Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if Flynn and Sessions were both gone and Rubio and Ridnour were the PG rotation next season.

yes please.

I have high aspirations for Flynn still and I want to avoid moving him at all costs. If he for some reason regresses this year, which I doubt, then my opinion would change.

However, I wonder with Al gone and increased ball movement that will result whether we can get away with a Flynn/Rubio backcourt for significant stretches.

i am really impressed with Flynn as well. i mean we only gave him one season and he had a lot of weight thrown on him in that season. i think that there is much to come from him.

We are going to keep all three until Flynn is healthy, which at that point, I think its fairly obvious that Sessions is out the door. Flynn will get this year to show us what he can do and simultaneously raise his trade value. They will play some stretches with Flynn operating as the SG on offense with Ridnour running the point to see how it works. If Flynn impresses, he stays, if not, he will be traded once Rubio lands in Minnesota with a signed contract to play the 2011 season.

I love Flynn, but I think Ridnour is the guy they brought in to be a strong veteran backup for Rubio.

Everyone knows that Kahn wants a line up of all PGs, we have sooooo many! let's just keep them all!


Seriously though, I still have hopes Flynn can be a dynamic combo off the bench ala Jason Terry (only more of a PG than a SG-where i'd have Terry as more of a SG than PG). Also, I want to see the "Orange Connection" in action because I think they'll have great chemistry.

I like sessions better than Flynn...I think he has skills....I honestly don't know why we just signed Luke without trading a PG first...

shouldnt you worry about these kind of things when rubio actually signs with you..

CoolKids wrote:shouldnt you worry about these kind of things when rubio actually signs with you..

this is ironic when you think about it

Where would Flynn go? Don't see Minnesota getting great value for him..

dookieguy wrote:Where would Flynn go? Don't see Minnesota getting great value for him..

Maybe Indiana for Paul George

skorff26 wrote:

dookieguy wrote:Where would Flynn go? Don't see Minnesota getting great value for him..

Maybe Indiana for Paul George

Sadly, that ship has probably sailed. Much to my disappointment.

Mikchek wrote:I like sessions better than Flynn...I think he has skills....I honestly don't know why we just signed Luke without trading a PG first...

that is easily the dumbest thing i have heard all month..