Page 1 of 8

A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:16 pm
by Klomp
Note: This is different from the full-page ad.

Dear Fans:
As training camp approaches, I know many of you are anxious to see what this coming season will bring. We'll be better this season, but you're no doubt wondering: How much better? Fair question. And because you are vested partners in our organization and members of our Pack, I feel it's important to share with you how this busy offseason has helped our team.
At this point, I can safely say that the rebuilding of the Timberwolves roster is, at long last, nearly complete.
Well, come to think of it, it hasn’t taken that long.

But I recognize it’s been several seasons since our team contended for a playoff spot and you’d like results now.

Me, too.

Nevertheless, to build a team to win at the highest level, it takes time. Band-Aids and shortcuts typically aren’t lasting in the NBA.

During the last 14 months, we have added several pieces to our ballclub: perimeter shooting, athleticism and length to the roster, and all while maintaining our youth. Just as important, we have done so with an eye toward adding more talent by choosing to operate under the salary cap.

The reality is, we are still lacking a dominant player – our version of Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade or Kevin Durant – and that will remain an item at the top of the To-Do list.

It’s possible this player could emerge from within the roster. Nearly every player on our team has his best days ahead of him. Some could make an All-Star team during their careers and one has already become an impact player on the USA Men’s National Team in this year’s FIBA World Championships. We also have eight players currently on the roster who were selected in the top-seven of their respective drafts: Michael Beasley, Kevin Love, Wes Johnson, Jonny Flynn, Darko Milicic, Corey Brewer, Martell Webster and Ricky Rubio.

The average age of those eight players is 22.

However, if one of our players fails to emerge, we will be prepared to find more talent for our team – and we will seek a singular move rather than a series of moves, as we did these last 14 months.

Hence, the desire to operate under the salary cap.

Just as we took advantage of Miami needing to move Michael Beasley to a “room” team on short notice, I am hopeful other opportunities will come across our desk at three specific periods during the next several months:

• Before the 2011 trading deadline, when teams that are over the tax line and not playing up to their capability seek to move a star player as the first step of a rebuild;

• During the 2011 draft period, when some teams will be seeking to move salary to create room for free agency (although the class of 2011 is not nearly as attractive as the class of 2010); and

• Immediately following the announcement of the new collective bargaining agreement, in whatever form it may take.

It’s been about 14 months since I took the job as President of Basketball Operations. Upon my hiring, I laid out a plan.

First, we would become a running team – it’s what the fans want to watch and the players want to play. Every player we have considered adding to our roster is first evaluated based upon his ability to play an up-tempo style, and then we look for the attributes that we have been lacking: size, shooting and athleticism.

Second, we would in all likelihood become younger – that we might have to take a step backward before moving forward in order to build a team that could compete for a number of years. The decision in particular to trade Randy Foye and Mike Miller for the fifth pick in the 2009 draft no doubt cost us a handful of wins last season, but it also presented us the opportunity to draft Rubio, who doesn’t turn 20 until October and who we expect to have join us in 2011.

Third, we wouldn’t be outworked – that we would instill a culture in basketball operations where management, coaches and players were accountable and expected to work around the clock -- around the year, really -- on reviving this franchise.

Fourth, we would be as transparent as possible in making these changes and explaining the reasoning behind them. Hence, this latest letter.

Without exception, every personnel move that was made this past summer was in keeping with the vision I described in late May 2009. On the night of the draft, we added young, athletic wing players who can run and shoot in Wesley, Martell and Lazar Hayward, to complement Corey Brewer and Wayne Ellington.

Wesley was the Big East Player of the Year last season for Syracuse and was considered the best pure wing in the draft.

Martell, who is only 23 even though this will be his sixth NBA season, has been a starter for the Trail Blazers in the past. Martell often was used as a spot-up 3-point shooter in Portland but we believe he can do more things when asked.

In July, we re-signed 7-foot Darko Milicic and brought aboard 6-10 Nikola Pekovic, both of whom can change ends quickly and play at the fast pace we want. Darko turned 25 this summer and Nikola is 24 – still young, but with the necessary maturity to compete against other big men in this league.

Last season Darko earned $7.5 million in the final year of a four-year deal. He took almost a 50 percent paycut to return to the NBA. He wants to be here and we want him here. There simply aren’t many centers of his size and athleticism who are capable of playing an all-around game.

Telling Darko how important he could be to our future while offering him a contract that represents a major paycut was a delicate dance. Darko understood this, too, and thus was willing to allow us some financial protection in the final year of his deal if things didn’t work out. But let me be clear: we think they will work out.

Later in free agency, we took advantage of our cap room to acquire Beasley for a pair of second-round picks. Michael was the No. 1 prospect in his high school class of 2007 and averaged 26 points and 12 rebounds in his one season of college basketball at Kansas State. He is only 21, with just two years under his belt, and may prove to be our most talented player – perhaps even a 20-and-10 player. He could blossom here under Kurt’s tutelage.

We also felt the time was right to trade Al Jefferson. We will miss Al. Kurt and I want this team to run and flow into a halfcourt offense that features passing and ball movement, with all five players capable of making plays for others. Though capable of playing in this offense, it doesn’t play well to Al’s strengths. Most important, Al would have impacted the playing time of Love, Milicic and Pekovic (and, as it developed, Beasley).

Finally, we added Luke Ridnour during free agency for a variety of reasons. Luke is more of a push-the-pace player than Ramon Sessions and also has several seasons of experience. He did a magnificent job last season both playing and mentoring Brandon Jennings in Milwaukee. I anticipate him challenging for significant playing time but also having the ability to mentor Jonny Flynn and, eventually, Rubio.

We are now a deep team, with quality backups at nearly every position. But we remain young, perhaps even the youngest team in the league. It’s highly unlikely we will challenge for the NBA championship this season, but I believe we now have a collection of talent that could form most of a core nucleus that has its best days ahead.

We will be a better team next season: better because we have more shooting, athleticism and length. Better because our coaches have a year together under their collective belts. And better because we are driven to upgrade our defense, which, frankly, was abysmal last season.

Our players and coaches have been working relentlessly this offseason. All of them. We are committed to being all we can be, as soon as possible, but knowing that our best days are still to come.

Thanks for your patience.


David Kahn
President of Basketball Operations


http://www.startribune.com/sports/wolve ... 73004.html

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:17 pm
by Klomp
Zgoda's thoughts:

It'll be great sport to watch in the coming months -- a time frame Kahn lays out that will run until a new Collective Bargaining Agreement is in place -- and contemplate what "star" players might become available for a team that has now young players and two extra first-round draft picks to offer.

The first, of course, is Carmelo Anthony. There will be more -- maybe not quite of Carmelo's stature -- to come.

The Wolves' chances of getting Melo to agree to a long-term contract here are small to say the least, but I expect Kahn to certainly explore the possibility. There's been talk here on the blog about the Wolves getting involved in a Melo deal as a third partner, but, as Kahn states in the letter, it's looking like the Wolves won't be adding a piece or two here and there much anymore (they believe they've done that) but rather will be looking for that one big move.

Who could it be, if not Melo?

I still say keep an eye on Atlanta, a team that historically struggles to draw fans and soon will be faced with big salary-cap issues as they deal with re-signing Al Horford and appeasing Jamal Crawford, two developments that could leave players like Josh Smith or Joe Johnson available.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:53 pm
by funkatron101
Seems almost identical to the strib letter.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:18 pm
by Krapinsky
It's the same drumbeat we've been marching to for the last year or so. Nothing new. I like how the front office is showing faith in the pieces they've acquired by touting them up individually a little bit.

Very excited to see how these guys all fit together. Can't wait for the season to start even if it is MLB playoff and NFL time.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:35 pm
by Esohny
I do expect the games to be more entertaining this season.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:38 pm
by funkatron101
The cynic in me says that there will be a lot of pouty babies and lackluster performances due to being disgruntled.

I hate being so negative.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:43 pm
by Klomp
Negativism =/= Realism

At least we aren't wondering how many fish our GM caught over the weekend...

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:19 pm
by Klomp
Later in free agency, we took advantage of our cap room to acquire Beasley for a pair of second-round picks. Michael was the No. 1 prospect in his high school class of 2007 and averaged 26 points and 12 rebounds in his one season of college basketball at Kansas State. He is only 21, with just two years under his belt, and may prove to be our most talented player – perhaps even a 20-and-10 player. He could blossom here under Kurt’s tutelage.


Just curious....how many 20/10 players have there been at SF? Is this a hint as to his role? Might Love stay a bench player?

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:50 pm
by Krapinsky
Klomp wrote:
Later in free agency, we took advantage of our cap room to acquire Beasley for a pair of second-round picks. Michael was the No. 1 prospect in his high school class of 2007 and averaged 26 points and 12 rebounds in his one season of college basketball at Kansas State. He is only 21, with just two years under his belt, and may prove to be our most talented player – perhaps even a 20-and-10 player. He could blossom here under Kurt’s tutelage.


Just curious....how many 20/10 players have there been at SF? Is this a hint as to his role? Might Love stay a bench player?


Young Larry Bird? Can't really think of any others. Even Gerald Wallace was only 18 and 10 this year.

Even if he's a PF for more minutes then we think, I still think 25 and 8 is probably more likely than 20 and 10.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:11 am
by Devilzsidewalk
how could getting a Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade or Kevin Durant, be on their "to do" list? The draft is over, they didn't get #1 pick. Doesn't matter how much you roll up your sleeves and get to work, you cant effort your way into getting a player like that.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:22 am
by jade_hippo
I'd take 25/8. With Love Brewer and Johnson, we have a lot of guys who can pick up rebounding slack. It'll be nice to have a guy who can go off for 30-40 points on a hot, hot night, we really haven't had a scorer who can even threaten that since... Ricky Davis? McCants?

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:44 am
by southern wolf
While you can question a lot of the things he's saying, not a lot of GM's take the time to do this and it's a nice touch. He said he was going to share his goals and motives with the fans right from the start and he's certainly done that. Correct me if i'm wrong, but I can't remember reading too many letters like this from Kevin McHale.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:54 am
by Breakdown777
If Defense is a major priority this season, I don't see how Beasley will play SF (or start, at least).

This is what I think the depth chart might look like if we go defense.
To start the season:

PG - Ridnour/Telfair
SG - Brewer/Waynedrops
SF - Webster/WesleySnipes
PF - Love/Beas/Tolliver
C - Darko/Pek/Kouf

The major battle will be between Webster, Love, and Beasley over the 3/4 spots. That lineup, with any combination, still isn't that good defensively (average at best).

Once the season gets underway, I think this is what most of us are hoping for/expecting:

PG - Flynn/Ridnour/Telfair
SG - Wesley/Brewer/Wayne
SF - Beasley/Brewer/Alexander/Hayward
PF - Love/Tolliver
C - Darko/Pek/Kouf

This doesn't look like much of an improvement on D. I'd actually say it's worse unless Jonny miraculously plays about 3 inches taller. Beas and Love are both pretty slow. This sort of leaves the small ball lineup our fastest, most defensive, and most athletic:

Flynn
Brew
Wes
Beas
Darko.

This seems like the quickest possibility anyway, but I also believe this leads to the most drama (because Love isn't starting).

Once Rubio comes over, I think we have the potential to be a top 10 Defensive team (maybe), but I still think that's pretty generous considering that we don't have any PF who are really good at D.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:09 am
by wolfcat
Though capable of playing in this offense, it doesn’t play well to Al’s strengths. Most important, Al would have impacted the playing time of Love, Milicic and Pekovic (and, as it developed, Beasley).



Does this make anyone think they are going to use Beasley in the 4 spot to a great extent rather than the 3 we were envisioning? I wonder how many PF minutes they are going to give Beasley? We could be looking at a disgruntled Love if Beasley gets too many 4 mins.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:49 am
by jade_hippo
wolfcat wrote: Though capable of playing in this offense, it doesn’t play well to Al’s strengths. Most important, Al would have impacted the playing time of Love, Milicic and Pekovic (and, as it developed, Beasley).



Does this make anyone think they are going to use Beasley in the 4 spot to a great extent rather than the 3 we were envisioning? I wonder how many PF minutes they are going to give Beasley? We could be looking at a disgruntled Love if Beasley gets too many 4 mins.


I think the vision is to go Beasley/Love at the 4/5 and outrun the competition. Kinda like the Suns did with Amare. Love can rebound with any C's in the league and he may be able to exploit some of the slower C's on offence? He's got the bulk to handle himself with a good chunk of the league.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:54 am
by Klomp
wolfcat wrote:Does this make anyone think they are going to use Beasley in the 4 spot to a great extent rather than the 3 we were envisioning? I wonder how many PF minutes they are going to give Beasley? We could be looking at a disgruntled Love if Beasley gets too many 4 mins.


I used another part of the article to ask the same thing earlier. I do wonder if he will play more PF than SF. Hopefully, Love's experience in Turkey will help him if he moves to the bench. I think theres a difference between Beasley starting in front of you and Hollins starting in front of you also.

Ridnour / (Flynn) / Telfair
Brewer / Ellington
Webster / Johnson / Hayward
Beasley / Love / Tolliver
Milicic / Pekovic / Koufus

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:31 am
by Grits n Gravy
jade_hippo wrote:
wolfcat wrote: Though capable of playing in this offense, it doesn’t play well to Al’s strengths. Most important, Al would have impacted the playing time of Love, Milicic and Pekovic (and, as it developed, Beasley).



Does this make anyone think they are going to use Beasley in the 4 spot to a great extent rather than the 3 we were envisioning? I wonder how many PF minutes they are going to give Beasley? We could be looking at a disgruntled Love if Beasley gets too many 4 mins.


I think the vision is to go Beasley/Love at the 4/5 and outrun the competition. Kinda like the Suns did with Amare. Love can rebound with any C's in the league and he may be able to exploit some of the slower C's on offence? He's got the bulk to handle himself with a good chunk of the league.


if you're playing love at the c, then better be dam sure you have very good/outstanding perimeter defenders. one is gonna think twice about driving the lane for a dunk or a lay up if love is the defender of the paint. at least with milicic and also pekovic, people are gonna think twice about driving the lane and question whether they are gonna be able to finish, or in pekovic's case, get back out of the paint un-raped. love, i'm sure, would work well offensively at the center spot...i just personally think we are gonna need pekovic or darko in the game pretty much 40+ minutes a game.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:42 am
by ChrisTheFuturePaul
Khan isn't expecting a playoff run at this point I assume, hes highlighted multiple times the youth aspect of the team and I think that hints at him wanting to evaluate everyone as best possible. If you break down the roster into tiers I think you get something like:

Tier 1:
Kevin Love
Michael Beasley
Johnny Flynn
Wesley Johnson

Tier 2:
Martel Webster
Darko Milicic
Luke Ridnour
Corey Brewer

Tier 3:
Tolliver
Ellington
Pekovic
Koufus

So basicly you're going to see tier one posting 30-38 minutes a game, tier two posting 15-25 minutes, tier three 5-10 minutes, will shake out depending on how the game is going on the night.

Certainly the Wolves will try, I believe to utilize Love and Beasley on the court together as much as possible, if they want to be an uptempo team it makes sense for them to focus on running smaller units than bigger. So i think your preferred unit in games you're competitive in will be:

Love
Beasley
Johnson
Webster
Flynn

(assuming Johnson can hit the ground running somewhat)

Loves fundamental excellence in the rebounding department shouldinstill enough confidence in the coaching team to run him as a small five, utilizing technique to secure boards or over-the-back fouls, this is also assuming Beasley makes the committment to learn to rebound better, but the above 5 are the best unit for the basketball Khan is describing IMO.

I like how the Wolves are shaping up, I didnt add Rubio to my post because I believe Flynn has shown enough to be the point guard of the future and Rubio will still have alot of trade value based on potential alone, wouldnt surprise me if cap space and Rubio is what the TWolves use to pull off their "icing on the cake" deal. Khan did mention Rubio joining the franchise in 2011, all of his "icing on the cake" scenarios were also in 2011, perhaps hes reassuring other GMs Rubio will be available to play for them at that time.

Anyways, just my thoughts from the outside looking in, hope was worth reading,

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:30 pm
by Worm Guts
Klomp wrote:
wolfcat wrote:Does this make anyone think they are going to use Beasley in the 4 spot to a great extent rather than the 3 we were envisioning? I wonder how many PF minutes they are going to give Beasley? We could be looking at a disgruntled Love if Beasley gets too many 4 mins.


I used another part of the article to ask the same thing earlier. I do wonder if he will play more PF than SF. Hopefully, Love's experience in Turkey will help him if he moves to the bench. I think theres a difference between Beasley starting in front of you and Hollins starting in front of you also.

Ridnour / (Flynn) / Telfair
Brewer / Ellington
Webster / Johnson / Hayward
Beasley / Love / Tolliver
Milicic / Pekovic / Koufus


I expect Beasley will play at both the 3 and the 4. Who starts and how many minutes he gets at each positon probably shouldn't be decided yet, and is probably fluid.

Re: A New Letter From Kahn

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:40 pm
by St.Nick
If its run and gun, Beasley has to be the PF. Its actually the one system where he might thrive in the NBA, due to his size issues. He'll get absolutely killed on defense, but if the team runs enough and beats the other guys down the floor then it works mathematically.

Also, Wes Johnson does not strike me as a run and gun SF. He isn't a good enough ball handler or passer to take the spot. Maybe as a PF in an ultra small lineup, but its not likely.

Another problem I see with this run and gun offense is that there aren't that many good passers. Most of your starters were well below the league average in APG. The only guy that sticks out as a good passer is Darko. Love could be excellent at starting the fast break, but I think he may have issues taking the punishment from opposing centers (assuming that is where he'll play, as he is likely too slow to be a good run and gun PF).

The guys that will thrive in the fast paced offense and Ridnour (who is made to run the fast break, although you don't want him on the floor for more than 20mpg), Ellington (good as a SF), Beasley, perhaps Brewer due to his speed and athleticism, and Darko. I don't think thats the group you want out there all that often as it neglects your most talented players (Flynn and Love).

I think if the team sticks with the fast break that it will be a bit like the Nuggets during the Westhead days, some high scores but mostly huge scores given up. Thats better to watch than a losing team putting up 15-20 wins while scoring 95ppg, but its still pretty dismal. Trust me about this as a Warriors fan.