http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/p ... yerId=1727
Shooting UNDER 40%, averaging 6.25 TURNOVERS a game, 4.75 PERSONAL FOULS a game, and still not playing defense.
All for the low, discount price of $100mil.
Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,243
- And1: 425
- Joined: Aug 31, 2005
- Location: A2
-
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
5 games guys. It takes a minute to get used to new mates, and all that stuff. He'll be fine...
Will you fools ever realize that when the cameras are on and the microphones are hot, they are Lying to you! Lying to illicit a prescribed reaction, to easier manipulate you.
Useful idiots!
Useful idiots!
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,004
- And1: 6,020
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
they haven't been hitting their outside shots till last game, but if they can keep some of that up, things should start opening up inside for Amar'e. So far teams have been making them shoot and until the Bulls, nobody has had to pay for it.

Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,886
- And1: 374
- Joined: Oct 21, 2010
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
Yeah, that contract and Joe Johnson's were real head scratchers for me.
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
What does outside shooting have to do with nearly 5 fouls a game, over 6 turnovers a game, and a team's big free agent signing who happens to be a big man hitting less than 40% of his shots.
5 games is enough for me to call it a career. Amar'e's a bust. He's done. He's nothing without Nash. $100mil flushed down the toilet.
5 games is enough for me to call it a career. Amar'e's a bust. He's done. He's nothing without Nash. $100mil flushed down the toilet.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
- eyeteeth
- Starter
- Posts: 2,109
- And1: 147
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
- Location: somewhere on the Front Range
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
john2jer wrote:What does outside shooting have to do with nearly 5 fouls a game, over 6 turnovers a game, and a team's big free agent signing who happens to be a big man hitting less than 40% of his shots.
5 games is enough for me to call it a career. Amar'e's a bust. He's done. He's nothing without Nash. $100mil flushed down the toilet.

The Knicks are anybody's guess right now. They could end up missing the playoffs by a mile or getting the 4th-5th seed. Trade ya Brewer and a draft pick for Gallinari...

Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,004
- And1: 6,020
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
frustration, trying to live up to his status as the Big Knick Signing. It'll get better. I don't think its just Nash, but he does need great play from his teammates to open things up for him. Don't know that he's going to get that from that roster though. I would have liked to see him go to the Heat instead of Bosh.

Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
I'm not worried about Amare's play. It's his knees that will always be an issue and he's playing 36 mpg.

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,898
- And1: 1,070
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
eyeteeth wrote:john2jer wrote:What does outside shooting have to do with nearly 5 fouls a game, over 6 turnovers a game, and a team's big free agent signing who happens to be a big man hitting less than 40% of his shots.
5 games is enough for me to call it a career. Amar'e's a bust. He's done. He's nothing without Nash. $100mil flushed down the toilet.
![]()
The Knicks are anybody's guess right now. They could end up missing the playoffs by a mile or getting the 4th-5th seed. Trade ya Brewer and a draft pick for Gallinari...
Don't worry ... Melo is enroute.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,235
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Remember when Amar'e Stoudemire was considered good?
I have to watch the game thread where Big Al plays against the knicks. NY fans are going to set off a nuke when Al drops 40 on Amare's chin.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves