ImageImageImage

terrence williams

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

canucklife21
Junior
Posts: 257
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
   

terrence williams 

Post#1 » by canucklife21 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:10 am

will the nets just trying to get rid of williams in that deal to houston do you think the wolves could of landed terrence. adding a wing who can create and jump outta the gym..
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: terrence williams 

Post#2 » by revprodeji » Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:37 am

A couple factors need to be considered.

1.) Was kahn lazy and did not discuss with houston?
2.) Did Houston give up more value then we would have?
3.) Does Terrence Williams have more value to us our Houston? We have Johnson and other wings.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: terrence williams 

Post#3 » by B Calrissian » Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:16 am

revprodeji wrote:A couple factors need to be considered.

1.) Was kahn lazy and did not discuss with houston?
2.) Did Houston give up more value then we would have?
3.) Does Terrence Williams have more value to us our Houston? We have Johnson and other wings.



I'd think 2&3 would both be yes. They have lots of shooters (Martin, Brooks, Battier, Buddinger, Lee) and could use a guy to create some shots for them.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: terrence williams 

Post#4 » by shangrila » Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:16 am

I don't think Williams is worth it. A bad egg, adds to a log jam, doesn't provide anything the team really needs.
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,626
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: terrence williams 

Post#5 » by Grits n Gravy » Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:39 am

shangrila wrote:I don't think Williams is worth it. A bad egg, adds to a log jam, doesn't provide anything the team really needs.

i think this team needs a slasher in the worst way, someone who can get into the lane at will and create fouls and havoc, if williams didn't have the personality issues i'd be all over him, but because of that i'd probably decline....williams is a lot like corey maggette imo, and thats the kind of offensive player we need, defense is another story
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: terrence williams 

Post#6 » by shangrila » Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:54 am

If he was that good he would have gotten more playing time for the Nets
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: terrence williams 

Post#7 » by B Calrissian » Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:59 am

shangrila wrote:If he was that good he would have gotten more playing time for the Nets


I don't think it was his talent holding him back. It was his attitude.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: terrence williams 

Post#8 » by shangrila » Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:02 am

On last year's team as well? I don't believe that.
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: terrence williams 

Post#9 » by B Calrissian » Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:06 am

shangrila wrote:On last year's team as well? I don't believe that.


He was a rookie averaging 8.4pt 4.5rb 2.9ast in 22min. He is far from a polished player (bad jumpshot) so him getting that amount of minutes as a rookie doesn't seem that strange.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: terrence williams 

Post#10 » by shangrila » Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:31 am

It does if he's the next Maggette.

Look, he's alright, I'm just saying he doesn't look like anything special.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,362
And1: 12,223
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: terrence williams 

Post#11 » by Worm Guts » Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:37 pm

We don't need to pursue every former first round pick. He's got some talent, but he's not necessarily better than the wing talent we already have. I could see going after Mayo or Randolph, but this doesn't seem like an upgrade.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: terrence williams 

Post#12 » by jpatrick » Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:33 pm

I agree we need a slashing wing, thus the interest in Iggy, but I don't think we should bring in another guy at this point who was considered a head case.

Here's a question. If we were to trade for a wing and had to give up one of Webster or Johnson, who would you rather give up? I've been thoroughly disappointed by Johnson and Webster is only ONE YEAR older. They both can shoot and Johnson is the better athlete and defender but Webster looks like a real basketball player. I'd be torn if we had to pick one to give up in a trade (and yes, I'd rather give up Brewer but I think his trade value is just about zero right now).
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,362
And1: 12,223
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: terrence williams 

Post#13 » by Worm Guts » Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:36 pm

Williams isn't a slashing wing, at least he hasn't been in the NBA. He has not gotten to the free throw line at all.
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: terrence williams 

Post#14 » by B Calrissian » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:26 pm

Worm Guts wrote:We don't need to pursue every former first round pick. He's got some talent, but he's not necessarily better than the wing talent we already have. I could see going after Mayo or Randolph, but this doesn't seem like an upgrade.


The same could be said about Mayo.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: terrence williams 

Post#15 » by shangrila » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:32 pm

B Calrissian wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:We don't need to pursue every former first round pick. He's got some talent, but he's not necessarily better than the wing talent we already have. I could see going after Mayo or Randolph, but this doesn't seem like an upgrade.


The same could be said about Mayo.

Not really. He's a big upgrade offensively over Johnson and probably Beasley at this point. It's only defence that lets him down.

jpatrick wrote:Here's a question. If we were to trade for a wing and had to give up one of Webster or Johnson, who would you rather give up? I've been thoroughly disappointed by Johnson and Webster is only ONE YEAR older. They both can shoot and Johnson is the better athlete and defender but Webster looks like a real basketball player. I'd be torn if we had to pick one to give up in a trade (and yes, I'd rather give up Brewer but I think his trade value is just about zero right now).

If I had to choose right now I'd pick Webster, just because this team needs veterans more then anything. But I doubt the FO is giving up on either of them this early.
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: terrence williams 

Post#16 » by B Calrissian » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:44 pm

shangrila wrote:
B Calrissian wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:We don't need to pursue every former first round pick. He's got some talent, but he's not necessarily better than the wing talent we already have. I could see going after Mayo or Randolph, but this doesn't seem like an upgrade.


The same could be said about Mayo.

Not really. He's a big upgrade offensively over Johnson and probably Beasley at this point. It's only defence that lets him down.


And defense is what the team needs.. We have enough players that can but the ball in the hoop.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: terrence williams 

Post#17 » by horaceworthy » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:46 pm

Worm Guts wrote:Williams isn't a slashing wing, at least he hasn't been in the NBA. He has not gotten to the free throw line at all.

He is a slashing wing, he's just poor at drawing contact (and was in college as well), and probably more valuable as a drive and kick/drop guy than he is as a finisher. Or at least he would be if he weren't such a goofball. FTA isn't the only thing a slashing wing provides.

Shagrila, Williams did put up 14/7/6 the last couple of months of the season last year. After a rough start to the beginning of the year, that was the only time he got consistent minutes.

He would have provided something this team lacks at the moment, in theory, but he may be one of those guys who isn't able to get out of his own way.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: terrence williams 

Post#18 » by horaceworthy » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:49 pm

shangrila wrote:
B Calrissian wrote:The same could be said about Mayo.

Not really. He's a big upgrade offensively over Johnson and probably Beasley at this point. It's only defence that lets him down.

What?
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: terrence williams 

Post#19 » by B Calrissian » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:58 pm

You have the quotes flip flopped.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: terrence williams 

Post#20 » by horaceworthy » Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:13 pm

B Calrissian wrote:You have the quotes flip flopped.

Thanks. Fixed.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves