Page 1 of 1
Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 3:26 am
by Klomp
Michael Beasley read it a couple weeks ago. He can't remember where he saw it, but the message of the article stuck with him.
"It said I was one-dimensional," the Timberwolves forward said Friday. "It kind of made me upset. I just kind of want to show people that I can do more than just score the basketball."
Maybe it was that story he read. Maybe it is the list of things Wolves coach Kurt Rambis and his staff work on with Beasley each day. Maybe it's just the natural progression of a naturally talented player getting the opportunity, over and over again, at important times in basketball games.
But Beasley is doing more.
Exhibit A: The end of the Wolves game in Cleveland on Sunday, with the Wolves down a point and the ball in Beasley's hands. Earlier this month, the lefthanded Beasley likely would have tried to drive to his left to get off a shot. He might have made it, too, or he might have had the ball swatted away by a team expecting it. Against the Cavaliers, Beasley drove right and scored on a layup.
Or take Monday's game against New Orleans. Beasley got his points, 30 of them, but he also had a career-high seven assists on a night when several players, including rookie Wes Johnson, were hot.
It was just another sign Beasley is trying to round out his game. He is averaging 22.2 points, 6.2 rebounds and 1.9 assists per game.
"Honestly I'm just playing basketball," he said. "I'm not trying to force it; it's chess, not checkers. ... Ultimately I just want to help my team win, whether it means scoring a million points, grabbing a million rebounds or blocking a million shots."
http://www.startribune.com/sports/wolves/112731744.html
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 3:36 am
by Tha Juice
I become a bigger fan of this guy more and more every day. Note to media: keep feeding him that fuel.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 3:37 am
by shangrila
I hope it was the coaching staff. If he pays more attention to the media then them we might be in trouble.
But it's definitely nice to see. Even if he's never Kobe or Lebron passing wise, just being able to pass out of doubles will open up his and the team game so much.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 4:40 am
by cpfsf
I really don't think scoring is simply one small aspect of the game. He can score in such a variety of ways which makes him unique. If scoring as a whole is considered one category, than I would agree he's one dimensional, but I will gladly take a player who can score 20 on any night, a mismatch nightmare, a true go to guy, a 3 point threat, and a clutch athlete...all in one player.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 3:11 pm
by Dewey
so.... we're talking one-dimensional in terms of offensive fundamentals? I was under the impression the article would point out our one-dimensional team in terms of no defense, etc.
Now we have sports writers finding it's newsworthy to note Beas, a NBA basketball player/former #2 draft-pick, can make layups with either hand!!. But hang on!! He had a few assists that one game!! Seriously? What a joke ... why can't these writers rip on the lack of Beasleys accountability on the defensive side? Why can't he make some stops? Why does he collect reckless/unnecessary fouls?
I'm not a Beasley hater (he just happens to be the center of the article) ... I just hate these type of articles that pat people on the back, when on the flip-side, the player is part of the bigger problem in terms of wins and losses ... and never called out on it.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 4:24 pm
by Klomp
Dewey wrote:so.... we're talking one-dimensional in terms of offensive fundamentals? I was under the impression the article would point out our one-dimensional team in terms of no defense, etc.
Now we have sports writers finding it's newsworthy to note Beas, a NBA basketball player/former #2 draft-pick, can make layups with either hand!!. But hang on!! He had a few assists that one game!! Seriously? What a joke ... why can't these writers rip on the lack of Beasleys accountability on the defensive side? Why can't he make some stops? Why does he collect reckless/unnecessary fouls?
I'm not a Beasley hater (he just happens to be the center of the article) ... I just hate these type of articles that pat people on the back, when on the flip-side, the player is part of the bigger problem in terms of wins and losses ... and never called out on it.
Were you one of those guys in 05-06 blaming KG for the 33-49 record too?
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 4:36 pm
by Piecake
Dewey wrote:so.... we're talking one-dimensional in terms of offensive fundamentals? I was under the impression the article would point out our one-dimensional team in terms of no defense, etc.
Now we have sports writers finding it's newsworthy to note Beas, a NBA basketball player/former #2 draft-pick, can make layups with either hand!!. But hang on!! He had a few assists that one game!! Seriously? What a joke ... why can't these writers rip on the lack of Beasleys accountability on the defensive side? Why can't he make some stops? Why does he collect reckless/unnecessary fouls?
I'm not a Beasley hater (he just happens to be the center of the article) ... I just hate these type of articles that pat people on the back, when on the flip-side, the player is part of the bigger problem in terms of wins and losses ... and never called out on it.
I thought he has been better about picking up silly fouls the last several games - dont think he has been in foul trouble for the last 7 or so, and cant really remember an absolutely stupid foul by him during that time span. I also remember reading another article about Love where he states that Beasley and him know that defensive is the one area in their game that they need to improve dramatically.
Plus, Rambis has already called out Beasley's defense on that Alternate jersey vid(hilarious). So the players know it, and I think they are improving slightly. Its just going to take a while to understand team defense and defensive rotations.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 4:56 pm
by Dewey
Klomp wrote:Dewey wrote:so.... we're talking one-dimensional in terms of offensive fundamentals? I was under the impression the article would point out our one-dimensional team in terms of no defense, etc.
Now we have sports writers finding it's newsworthy to note Beas, a NBA basketball player/former #2 draft-pick, can make layups with either hand!!. But hang on!! He had a few assists that one game!! Seriously? What a joke ... why can't these writers rip on the lack of Beasleys accountability on the defensive side? Why can't he make some stops? Why does he collect reckless/unnecessary fouls?
I'm not a Beasley hater (he just happens to be the center of the article) ... I just hate these type of articles that pat people on the back, when on the flip-side, the player is part of the bigger problem in terms of wins and losses ... and never called out on it.
Were you one of those guys in 05-06 blaming KG for the 33-49 record too?
No ... were you?
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 6:18 pm
by Twolves98
I have not watched a recent Wolves game but last time is saw him play his defense was way better, he had a couple blocks and steals but it certainly was not the best he could do
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 7:09 pm
by horaceworthy
Dewey wrote:so.... we're talking one-dimensional in terms of offensive fundamentals? I was under the impression the article would point out our one-dimensional team in terms of no defense, etc.
Now we have sports writers finding it's newsworthy to note Beas, a NBA basketball player/former #2 draft-pick, can make layups with either hand!!. But hang on!! He had a few assists that one game!! Seriously? What a joke ... why can't these writers rip on the lack of Beasleys accountability on the defensive side? Why can't he make some stops? Why does he collect reckless/unnecessary fouls?
I'm not a Beasley hater (he just happens to be the center of the article) ... I just hate these type of articles that pat people on the back, when on the flip-side, the player is part of the bigger problem in terms of wins and losses ... and never called out on it.
What a randomly salty response to an inconsequential article about Beasley's improved play (and it has played a much better all around game recently) of late. He's bad at some things, therefore it shouldn't be acknowledged when he improves at a couple of them unless he's still going to be ripped for his remaining faults? Just seems like an odd stance to take.
Also, it's not like Beasley's defense is never called out. For instance, Rambis called him out on it on the last episode of the B'Easy Show.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Sat Jan 1, 2011 8:32 pm
by Dewey
horaceworthy wrote:Dewey wrote:so.... we're talking one-dimensional in terms of offensive fundamentals? I was under the impression the article would point out our one-dimensional team in terms of no defense, etc.
Now we have sports writers finding it's newsworthy to note Beas, a NBA basketball player/former #2 draft-pick, can make layups with either hand!!. But hang on!! He had a few assists that one game!! Seriously? What a joke ... why can't these writers rip on the lack of Beasleys accountability on the defensive side? Why can't he make some stops? Why does he collect reckless/unnecessary fouls?
I'm not a Beasley hater (he just happens to be the center of the article) ... I just hate these type of articles that pat people on the back, when on the flip-side, the player is part of the bigger problem in terms of wins and losses ... and never called out on it.
What a randomly salty response to an inconsequential article about Beasley's improved play (and it has played a much better all around game recently) of late. He's bad at some things, therefore it shouldn't be acknowledged when he improves at a couple of them unless he's still going to be ripped for his remaining faults? Just seems like an odd stance to take.
Also, it's not like Beasley's defense is never called out. For instance, Rambis called him out on it on the last episode of the B'Easy Show.
Don't disagree ... but as I said, there's no need to make an article that points out how an NBA player really can use both hands. If the local media is this desperate for a story, then at least paint the bigger picture that does the guy justice ... I'm pretty sure Beas is about impressed with this article as I was.
Randomly salty? ... fine with me. This article is unworthy of further conversation IMO.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Mon Jan 3, 2011 2:44 pm
by abrewbro68
Plus, Rambis has already called out Beasley's defense on that Alternate jersey vid(hilarious).
Please get me a link to this video. I haven't seen it and can't find it anywhere
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Mon Jan 3, 2011 3:01 pm
by Tirion
Klomp wrote:
"Honestly I'm just playing basketball," he said. "I'm not trying to force it; it's chess, not checkers. ... Ultimately I just want to help my team win, whether it means scoring a million points, grabbing a million rebounds or blocking a million shots."
http://www.startribune.com/sports/wolves/112731744.html
Somebody's watchin' "The Wire".
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Mon Jan 3, 2011 4:04 pm
by shrink
One dimensional?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkxieS-6WuA&feature=&p=A6F9DDA372DDE20A&index=0&playnext=1[/youtube]
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Mon Jan 3, 2011 11:54 pm
by funkatron101
shrink wrote:One dimensional?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkxieS-6WuA&feature=&p=A6F9DDA372DDE20A&index=0&playnext=1[/youtube]
I have trouble grasping the concept of the flatland theory and how they would be able to see anything at all. If all flatland objects are on the same plane, and have no concept of height, how can they see anything? We can tell an object is 2D because of our vantage point, and well because we see in 3D.
Carl Sagan made my brain hurt.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 12:15 am
by Grits n Gravy
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 12:19 am
by mandurugo
Dewey wrote:Don't disagree ... but as I said, there's no need to make an article that points out how an NBA player really can use both hands. If the local media is this desperate for a story, then at least paint the bigger picture that does the guy justice ... I'm pretty sure Beas is about impressed with this article as I was.
Randomly salty? ... fine with me. This article is unworthy of further conversation IMO.
Every NBA player can use both hands, it's just that not that many can use both hands against other NBA players.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 12:56 am
by Esohny
mandurugo wrote:
Every NBA player can use both hands, it's just that not that many can use both hands against other NBA players.
Yep. "The Stranger" can definitely be weird enough to use on oneself, let alone on another NBA player.
Re: Don't Call Beasley One-Dimensional
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 1:21 am
by big3_8_19_21
shrink wrote:One dimensional?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkxieS-6WuA&feature=&p=A6F9DDA372DDE20A&index=0&playnext=1[/youtube]
So what, the infinite infinities are the product of some kind of 10-dimensional origami?