Page 1 of 37
MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:34 pm
by Klomp
No Gerald Wallace, no Stephen Jackson, no Nazr Mohammed tonight for Bobcats.
This is a game WE MUST DOMINATE.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:35 pm
by C.lupus
Oooh, didn't realize all those guys were out. Better change my +/- pick.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:40 pm
by theGreatRC
No doubt in my mind that we win this game. Gerald Wallace and SJAX are their two best offensive players and Crash is their best on D.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:42 pm
by eyeteeth
Planning on going to this one. Hoping to cheer on a total victory.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:44 pm
by wildvikeswolves
Wow haha didn't know that. We shoulda won last time when they had them, no excuse not to win tonight
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:44 pm
by BigSlam
Tyrus Thomas is a game time decision as well! Diop is also out.
We'll be lucky to suit up 10 players tonight - and our only two legit bigs will be Diaw and Kwame.
It's going to be exciting to see K.Love go for two 30/30 games in the one season!
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:46 pm
by Klomp
A win of a game thread right here:
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=1081242
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:55 pm
by UK-Wolf
We should get the W tonight, the Wolves never make anything easy though. I expect Love to have a huge game seeing as Brown/Diaw are hardly solid rebounders. Go Wolves!
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 7:59 pm
by CoffeeJanitor
Hopefully going tonight.
Anyone know how early you have to get there to be one of the first 100? I'm going for $5 tix, cause I'm a cheap college kid.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 8:05 pm
by john2jer
CoffeeJanitor wrote:Hopefully going tonight.
Anyone know how early you have to get there to be one of the first 100? I'm going for $5 tix, cause I'm a cheap college kid.
Show up about halftime and you should be good.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 8:27 pm
by Greco21
These kind of games are always tricky. Unrest is your worst enemy.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 8:40 pm
by theGreatRC
BigSlam wrote:Tyrus Thomas is a game time decision as well! Diop is also out.
We'll be lucky to suit up 10 players tonight - and our only two legit bigs will be Diaw and Kwame.
It's going to be exciting to see K.Love go for two 30/30 games in the one season!
If Tyrus Thomas is out, then i'm 110% about the win.
Him and DJ were the only two I was worrying about going off for 40+ tonight with all of your players out.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 9:06 pm
by Krapinsky
Ninja Cat won me over on the other thread.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 9:19 pm
by Esohny
Apparently we're expected to just fold up shop and melt down if the Wolves lose tonight.
Makes sense, since it's not like we're used to seeing the Wolves blow games that they should win.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 9:21 pm
by Klomp
It was brought up on the Cats board, so I might as well bring it here:
http://www.nba.com/games/20100210/CHAMI ... GIboxscore
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 9:25 pm
by Krapinsky
I remember that game. Jefferson made Nazr look like Bill Russell.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 9:28 pm
by funkatron101
Thanks for reminding me.
That was one of my upgrade seats.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 9:30 pm
by re49gb_2gho32fp
Still coveting a very anticipated 2nd Milla-check touch pass nba highlight.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 9:39 pm
by Klomp
A few things I took from that highlight package:
1. Al was fat.
2. Those green trees were hideous.
3. Ramon can dunk?
4. 8 looks much better on Beasley than Gomes
5. I'm glad Nazr is out.
Re: MIN vs CHA, 7:00 PM, FSN
Posted: Wed Jan 5, 2011 9:56 pm
by shangrila
Epic win of a gamethread.
Should be a win and a big one at that.