If Wolves Draft Williams and if he is a SF then

SRSM · Post #1 » by **SRSM** » Wed May 18, 2011 6:31 pm

would you consider trading W Johnson and Beasley for Varejao from Cleveland? I heard that if Cleveland drafts Kanter with their 4th pick then Varejao might be available. Also I have heard that the experiment with Johnson playing SG did not work and that he needs to play SF.

Post #2 » by **Worm Guts** » Wed May 18, 2011 6:33 pm

Beasley and Johnson for Varejao? Come on

Post #3 » by **revprodeji** » Wed May 18, 2011 6:35 pm

If we feel he needs to play SF then he will do it here.

Esohny · Post #4 » by **Esohny** » Wed May 18, 2011 7:00 pm

Worm Guts wrote:Beasley and Johnson for Varejao? Come on

prefuse73 · Post #5 » by **prefuse73** » Wed May 18, 2011 7:16 pm

I would entertain Beasley and filler for Fraggle Rock but not both. The ideal spot for Johnson is SF, but I could see him or Williams as a 6th man.

This is dependant on Williams showing some serious potential during workouts. Beasley can also score in several different ways...williams was more efficient during college, but I don't think he has a higher ceiling.

We need to use the #2 to help us get the best wing player possible.

[RCG] · Post #6 » by **[RCG]** » Wed May 18, 2011 7:31 pm

Worm Guts wrote:Beasley and Johnson for Varejao? Come on

B Calrissian · Post #7 » by **B Calrissian** » Wed May 18, 2011 8:07 pm

Beasleys value has to be one of the most underrated on these boards. The far and away best offer I've seen for him since we got him is the 9th pick and I wouldn't do that.

shrink · Post #8 » by **shrink** » Wed May 18, 2011 11:08 pm

I think he must have forgot to include the 4 pick?

Peezo · Post #9 » by **Peezo** » Wed May 18, 2011 11:34 pm

Its 100 percent we would trade both of them for AV, but I'm not sure I would do either. From a value standpoint they are still younger, haven't had any injury history (one hurt year for AV doesn't seem fair, but it happened) and are on cheaper deals right now. From a talent standpoint, I'd say each has the potential to be a better scorer than AV is a defender. Just not sure how much I like Varejao as a starter either.

No thanks.

Devilzsidewalk · Post #10 » by **Devilzsidewalk** » Thu May 19, 2011 2:58 am

Peezo wrote:Its 100 percent we would trade both of them for AV, but I'm not sure I would do either.

look at the confused expression on my face

Killboard · Post #11 » by **Killboard** » Thu May 19, 2011 3:29 am

AV is not a long term fix. Probably is a good backup C in years to come, with a bad injur history and his contract is twice Pek's. In the other hand Beas and Wes has his prime in the next five years and has rookie contracts. This is a no brainer.