ImageImageImage

The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,742
And1: 2,567
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#1 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:43 pm

Martell Webster is guaranteed only $600,000 for 2012-13.
Brad Miller is guaranteed only $848,000.

Combined they are guaranteed only 1,448,000.

Webster will make $5,256,000 for 2011-12.
Miller will make $4,752,000.
Combined that is $10,008,000.

Under current CBA matching rules we could take back
$12,261,000 in salary for them.
That is $11,162,000 in potential savings (and cap room) for some team.

Remember the talk about Det sending 8+Hamilton to CLE for their TPE?
Miller and Webster will function just like that TPE on draft day next year.

Even if we don't end up with the Utah pick, could we use those 2 to essentially "buy" a lottery pick next year if the new CBA puts a squeeze on teams? Maybe pick up an overpriced but valuable player?
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#2 » by [RCG] » Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:47 pm

younggunsmn wrote:Martell Webster is guaranteed only $600,000 for 2012-13.
Brad Miller is guaranteed only $848,000.

Combined they are guaranteed only 1,448,000.

Webster will make $5,256,000 for 2011-12.
Miller will make $4,752,000.
Combined that is $10,008,000.

Under current CBA matching rules we could take back
$12,261,000 in salary for them.
That is $11,162,000 in potential savings (and cap room) for some team.

Remember the talk about Det sending 8+Hamilton to CLE for their TPE?
Miller and Webster will function just like that TPE on draft day next year.

Even if we don't end up with the Utah pick, could we use those 2 to essentially "buy" a lottery pick next year if the new CBA puts a squeeze on teams? Maybe pick up an overpriced but valuable player?


I'm sure they will be. I wouldn't be surprised if the Wolves front-office had this in mind when they acquired Webster and traded for Miller. Having the option to package these guys could come up pretty big if the new CBA puts a squeeze on some of the bigger-spending teams.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#3 » by JMillott » Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:03 pm

Actually, you don't even have to wait for that package to be valuable. Miller's salary is insured so any team he plays for is getting paid back whatever they pay him so he is basically a trade exception already.

Webster is a servicable player who can fill a role on a great many teams and like you said he is basically an expiring contract so its a short term commitment. In fact he is exactly the type of player a team might want in return if they were moving a high salary veteran out of the way so a young prospect can start because he can fill that back up role short team for less, isn't unhappy about getting benched and teams love backups who are good for a 100+ threes a year.

In fact this is the exact package i'd expect to be put around a Michael Beasley if the Wolves make a trade for a major piece like an Iggy, Monta, Martin, etc. Perhaps with the Wolves throwing in a pick or two in order to sweeten the deal for someone a little better or to get a team to take an Ellington, Pekovic, Darko, etc.
User avatar
NoelTheMole
Sophomore
Posts: 189
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#4 » by NoelTheMole » Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:06 am

I smell a S&T for Dwight Howard!
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,295
And1: 19,306
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#5 » by shrink » Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:24 am

One more advantage is that unlike expirings, these guys can be traded after the season is over.

Since both players are guaranteed "some" salary in 2012-13, they become eligible for trades before the summer moritorium. Now, several teams that need cap space (and we may be one, so we may not trade them at all) may make deals before the February trade deadline, we often see team directions change in the last third of the season, or especially in the play-offs. These deals have strategic trade value by allowing a team to make a last-second change in their financial direction.
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#6 » by JMillott » Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:43 am

NoelTheMole wrote:I smell a S&T for Dwight Howard!


As unlikely as it is that Dwight Howard would willingly sign or agree to be sign and traded to the Wolves, I must admit that the Wolves roster would actually be a pretty good fit for him. I mean the Wolves have shooters, having guys that can maybe be beat off the dribble isn't nearly the same issue with Dwight Horward behind them and for Dwight i've got to believe the idea of a passing PG like Rubio to feed him would make him better and then you've got the factor that he must be getting sick of being the only rebounder on his teams so playing with Love would take all that pressure off of him.

It'll never happen but he'd certainly have enough around him to win titles.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,004
And1: 6,020
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#7 » by Devilzsidewalk » Sun Jun 26, 2011 2:29 am

thats pretty awesome to know, the trade makes a ton more sense now. Makes it easier to deal for a good player midseason too because Webster and Miller actually have some ability to contribute unlike Dampier
Image
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#8 » by Esohny » Sun Jun 26, 2011 2:51 am

Now if Kahn were only allowed to add salary.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#9 » by JMillott » Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:15 am

Esohny wrote:Now if Kahn were only allowed to add salary.


I believe that he would be allowed to take on salary if it was a salary that would make a difference. Its not like Glen Taylor was unwilling to throw money at the problem back during the McHale era, its just that after spending all that money mostly for nothing he likely has learned that you don't do it unless its worth it.

In all honesty, you're better off having an owner and management group that thinks before it spends. I'm very happy the Celtics owners have been willing to pay the luxtax during this window but i'm just as grateful they have drawn a line in the sand and haven't commited to anyone besides Rondo and Pierce beyond the last year of KG's extension besides slotted rookie contracts and even with Pierce and Rondo they only gave them what they're actually worth if not less.

It might've bit them on the *** in regards to not giving Tony Allen that third year but i'd still rather they keep their options open and are ready to reload instead of having to rebuild after next year.
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,076
And1: 3,619
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#10 » by Foye » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:28 am

They seem like pretty amazing trade chips. I bet Webster stays and Miller gets cut, though.
Peezo
Rookie
Posts: 1,051
And1: 79
Joined: Apr 06, 2010

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#11 » by Peezo » Sun Jun 26, 2011 7:33 am

I haven't read anything substantial on Miller's feelings about being here / our stance on his role with the team. Does anyone have a good link?
Turnover_21 wrote:So who do we get? Capspace? Is Capspace white?
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#12 » by shangrila » Sun Jun 26, 2011 8:42 am

JMillott wrote:
Esohny wrote:Now if Kahn were only allowed to add salary.


I believe that he would be allowed to take on salary if it was a salary that would make a difference. Its not like Glen Taylor was unwilling to throw money at the problem back during the McHale era, its just that after spending all that money mostly for nothing he likely has learned that you don't do it unless its worth it.

Yeah but back then the economy wasn't in the toilet
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,076
And1: 3,619
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#13 » by Foye » Sun Jun 26, 2011 9:05 am

I gotta say we would have the most trading chips of all nba teams if our 2012 pick still belonged to us.

We might even have the most without that pick.
User avatar
Yes We Kahn
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,421
And1: 18
Joined: Jul 15, 2010

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#14 » by Yes We Kahn » Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:05 am

Peezo wrote:I haven't read anything substantial on Miller's feelings about being here / our stance on his role with the team. Does anyone have a good link?

I believe in Kahn's interview with Bill Simmons he mentioned that he was excited about Miller's veteran presence on the team, but I could be remembering wrong. I think there is a link in that thread.
User avatar
EddyCool
Rookie
Posts: 1,166
And1: 16
Joined: Feb 21, 2005

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#15 » by EddyCool » Sun Jun 26, 2011 12:06 pm

shangrila wrote:
JMillott wrote:
Esohny wrote:Now if Kahn were only allowed to add salary.
I believe that he would be allowed to take on salary if it was a salary that would make a difference. Its not like Glen Taylor was unwilling to throw money at the problem back during the McHale era, its just that after spending all that money mostly for nothing he likely has learned that you don't do it unless its worth it.

Yeah but back then the economy wasn't in the toilet

There's still nothing to suggest this is remotely accurate. Even the Kahn/Rambis, "don't pay two coaches," has only ever been fan speculation. It's like the only reason anyone thinks Taylor is cheap is because they can reason out financially-rational explanations for our circumstances.

Also - he paid Darko at the behest of Kahn/Rambis when the media said it was moronic, but nobody thinks about that.
Yes We Kahn wrote:
Peezo wrote:I haven't read anything substantial on Miller's feelings about being here / our stance on his role with the team. Does anyone have a good link?

I believe in Kahn's interview with Bill Simmons he mentioned that he was excited about Miller's veteran presence on the team, but I could be remembering wrong. I think there is a link in that thread.

He did. He said he knows him from his time in Indiana, and likes his character and thinks he can help out in the locker room.

It's kind of weird... long ago I decided I hated him because he was pissy and pushy against KG (may not have been playoffs specifically). Times change.
Nikola Pekovic wrote:I'd like to go back to the time they used swords. I think I'd be good with a sword.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#16 » by NewWolvesOrder » Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:36 pm

Yes We Kahn wrote:
Peezo wrote:I haven't read anything substantial on Miller's feelings about being here / our stance on his role with the team. Does anyone have a good link?

I believe in Kahn's interview with Bill Simmons he mentioned that he was excited about Miller's veteran presence on the team, but I could be remembering wrong. I think there is a link in that thread.


Miller is an outdoor type of guy,he loves hunting and fishing so we will love his time in Sota while rehabbing from MF surgery. Maybe Taylor will convince to stick to outdoor activities so that isurance company keeps paying his salary :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QAumv7wR58
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgUjVfAx-wQ

there's a few more related videos featuring Miller.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,295
And1: 19,306
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#17 » by shrink » Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:54 pm

I hope that the 15-man roster limit doesn't encourage the wolves to simply buy out the remainder of Brad Miller's contract (with the help of the insurance company). I like the opportunity to have him in the locker room, and the contract will be a trade chip at the deadline, or before the next season begins.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,800
And1: 22,387
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#18 » by Klomp » Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:10 pm

shrink wrote:I hope that the 15-man roster limit doesn't encourage the wolves to simply buy out the remainder of Brad Miller's contract (with the help of the insurance company). I like the opportunity to have him in the locker room, and the contract will be a trade chip at the deadline, or before the next season begins.

With how young our team is, I'd be surprised if Kahn buys him out
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#19 » by TrentTuckerForever » Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:43 pm

EddyCool wrote:It's kind of weird... long ago I decided I hated him because he was pissy and pushy against KG (may not have been playoffs specifically). Times change.


Miller is a classic "love him on your team, hate him on any other team" veteran. If he can suit up and play 15-20 MPG 60-70 games for the Woofies, I think he'd make a difference.

I like all the roster advantages of the young, cheap talent, and the easily moved veterans. I just don't trust that Kahn is the guy to finally make the signature move cash in these chips.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,800
And1: 22,387
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Webster/Miller trade chip next offseason 

Post#20 » by Klomp » Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:47 pm

TrentTuckerForever wrote:I like all the roster advantages of the young, cheap talent, and the easily moved veterans. I just don't trust that Kahn is the guy to finally make the signature move cash in these chips.

Why not? He's the one who acquired all of them sans Love.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves