Balance the Lineup
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:17 pm
Not sure how many people on here watch every Wolves game, but with the sample size of games played to date, it is obvious the Wolves' lineup needs to be balanced. Adelman has done a fine job with this issue, but NBA rotations are not designed to give 10-12 players major minutes. Even more so, when the roster is young players trying to prove themselves and find their NBA role.
Here is my trade thought to do so...
To Wolves: Harden, McGee, Nazr (expiring), Turiaf (expiring)
To Nets: Beasley, Wolves 1st Rd Pick (Utah)
To OKC: Derrick Williams, Morrow
To Wiz: Rid, Randolph, Darko or Pek or Miller, Wolves 1st Rd Pick (Memphis)
Wolves
Rotation: PG-Rubio/JJ…SG-Harden/Ellington…SF-Wes/Webster…PF-Love/Tolliver…C-McGee/Pek
Reasoning: For the cost of DW, upgrades SG position to ideal-young-player next to Rubio. Balances lineup from too many players needing major minutes at similar positions and gives Wes a chance to start at more natural 3 position. McGee is ideal defensive C next to Love.
Nets
Rotation: PG-Williams/Farmar…SG-Brooks/Stevenson…SF-Beasley/James…PF-Kris/Beasley…C-Lopez/Okur
Reasoning: Beasley might find new life on Deron’s team with an eccentric Russian owner…Beasley also would get his minutes, shots, and starts (is he really going to accept bench role in MN?). Trade also lands Nets more assets to go along with Lopez in any Howard deal.
OKC
Rotation: PG-Westbrook/RJ…SG-Sef/Morrow…SF-KD/DW…PF-Ibaka/DW/Collison…C-Perkins/Cole
Reasoning: For the cost of Harden, they upgrade their bench. Still have sharp shooter in Morrow but gain DW to play ‘Jeff Green’ like role. DW will be learning from one of the best SF in the game and provide nice defensive-offensive 1-2 punch at PF with starter Ibaka. OKC also gains some financial flexibility with DW having more years on rookie deal then Harden.
Wizards
Rotation: PG-Wall/Rid…SG-Young/Crawford…SF-Lewis/JV…PF-Blatche/Booker/AR…C-Darko/AR
Reasoning: For a downgrade at C, they gain a vet PG to help Wall develop (Ridnour). They also gain another young project at PF to maybe replace failing Blatche; Randolph can also play C next to forwards Vesley and Davis (top 3 pick ’12). And having more 1st round picks is always helpful when rebuilding.
Here is my trade thought to do so...
To Wolves: Harden, McGee, Nazr (expiring), Turiaf (expiring)
To Nets: Beasley, Wolves 1st Rd Pick (Utah)
To OKC: Derrick Williams, Morrow
To Wiz: Rid, Randolph, Darko or Pek or Miller, Wolves 1st Rd Pick (Memphis)
Wolves
Rotation: PG-Rubio/JJ…SG-Harden/Ellington…SF-Wes/Webster…PF-Love/Tolliver…C-McGee/Pek
Reasoning: For the cost of DW, upgrades SG position to ideal-young-player next to Rubio. Balances lineup from too many players needing major minutes at similar positions and gives Wes a chance to start at more natural 3 position. McGee is ideal defensive C next to Love.
Nets
Rotation: PG-Williams/Farmar…SG-Brooks/Stevenson…SF-Beasley/James…PF-Kris/Beasley…C-Lopez/Okur
Reasoning: Beasley might find new life on Deron’s team with an eccentric Russian owner…Beasley also would get his minutes, shots, and starts (is he really going to accept bench role in MN?). Trade also lands Nets more assets to go along with Lopez in any Howard deal.
OKC
Rotation: PG-Westbrook/RJ…SG-Sef/Morrow…SF-KD/DW…PF-Ibaka/DW/Collison…C-Perkins/Cole
Reasoning: For the cost of Harden, they upgrade their bench. Still have sharp shooter in Morrow but gain DW to play ‘Jeff Green’ like role. DW will be learning from one of the best SF in the game and provide nice defensive-offensive 1-2 punch at PF with starter Ibaka. OKC also gains some financial flexibility with DW having more years on rookie deal then Harden.
Wizards
Rotation: PG-Wall/Rid…SG-Young/Crawford…SF-Lewis/JV…PF-Blatche/Booker/AR…C-Darko/AR
Reasoning: For a downgrade at C, they gain a vet PG to help Wall develop (Ridnour). They also gain another young project at PF to maybe replace failing Blatche; Randolph can also play C next to forwards Vesley and Davis (top 3 pick ’12). And having more 1st round picks is always helpful when rebuilding.