Anthony Randolph
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Anthony Randolph
-
- Junior
- Posts: 257
- And1: 22
- Joined: Jul 30, 2008
-
Anthony Randolph
What do wolves fan see the issues are with AR failure to be productive and our future center? from what ive seen lack of strength is killing him and the Lack of basketball iQ. I really had high hopes for him and wes thing year. Is adelman not giving him a proper chance? or is he even showing in practice he deserves it? We all just imgaine how good the wolves can be if AR just comes close to what we all thought. It brothers me so much of what type of player he can be. He would be perfect beside love for years! IF Deandre Jordan can pull together why cant AR. Hes more gifted more on the offence side of the ball and defence is all about desire and will. P.s By no means am i bashing Jordan however i know once he came into the league everyone thought he came to early from college and wasnt going to be what he is now and still developing .
Re: Anthony Randolph
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Anthony Randolph
He's got a 10 cent brain.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,803
- And1: 22,392
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Anthony Randolph
See C.lupus sig
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Senior
- Posts: 555
- And1: 300
- Joined: Apr 03, 2008
Re: Anthony Randolph
The problem with Randolph playing center is that he's not a center! He never was a center and never will be a center. He's a soft power forward with little low post game and that's why he can never play center effectively. He could probably be a good PF on the right team, but that will never happen here with all of our PF's.
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,898
- And1: 1,070
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: Anthony Randolph
He's a role player. Period. He's never develop any inside or outside game or improved defensively. My biggest gripe with him is he does not play with any intensity. Don't need to say a word, but you need to show some emotion in your efforts (lose balls, charges, etc).
I remember a couple years ago there poster willing to give up solid assets to acquire AR ...
I remember a couple years ago there poster willing to give up solid assets to acquire AR ...

Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,885
- And1: 264
- Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Re: Anthony Randolph
Dewey wrote:He's a role player. Period. He's never develop any inside or outside game or improved defensively. My biggest gripe with him is he does not play with any intensity. Don't need to say a word, but you need to show some emotion in your efforts (lose balls, charges, etc).
I remember a couple years ago there poster willing to give up solid assets to acquire AR ...
Old REM would probably still give up solid assets to get magic randolph again

Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Anthony Randolph
Magic Randolph for Dorell Wright. Do it.
Re: Anthony Randolph
- LOBO 7
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,447
- And1: 49
- Joined: Oct 30, 2008
- Location: Thailand
-
Re: Anthony Randolph
Dewey wrote:He's a role player. Period. He's never develop any inside or outside game or improved defensively. My biggest gripe with him is he does not play with any intensity. Don't need to say a word, but you need to show some emotion in your efforts (lose balls, charges, etc).
I remember a couple years ago there poster willing to give up solid assets to acquire AR ...
There are many things to criticize AR for, but I think that lack of intensity is not usually one of them. Most nights, he really throws himself around out there, trying to do too much, and showing lots of emotion. His problem is that he hasn't been able to let the game slow down for him, rushing things a lot of time and becoming frustrated too easily. If you want to see a lack of intensity or emotion, just look at Beas on most nights. In fact, intensity is one of the few things AR still has going for him, and I think there is still some potential for him to continue developing his chemistry with Rubio and becoming a solid option for us off the bench. We'll see. I don't exactly have high hopes for him, but I haven't completely written him off either.
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,085
- And1: 1,576
- Joined: Dec 24, 2003
- Location: The O
-
Re: Anthony Randolph
What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)
A smart coach once said, "Potential just means you're not good enough yet." Playing on potential is like living on air: It's essential, but if thats all you have, you're eventually going to starve.
Twitter: @CleonONE IG: @usaidwhatnah
Twitter: @CleonONE IG: @usaidwhatnah
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,898
- And1: 1,070
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: Anthony Randolph
Neon1 wrote:What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)
Role player ... aka perimeter Defender.
However, with Darko nuring injury again, I'm not sure how he stacks up moving forward, and for all I know, we may look to start giving AR a little more involved with a more consistent role.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: Anthony Randolph
- teven_1
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,201
- And1: 16
- Joined: Jun 01, 2010
Re: Anthony Randolph
i always figured Randolph is a point forward.
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,803
- And1: 22,392
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Anthony Randolph
Neon1 wrote:What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)
JJ Redick?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,326
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jul 27, 2010
Re: Anthony Randolph
Just mentioned him in another thread while unaware of this one.
Randolph can be a stud but he needs to go to a different team. A veteran team where he can play 20 minutes per game for a defensive oriented coach. To have a Taj Gibson type of role and go from there. Lakers, Celtics.
Randolph can be a stud but he needs to go to a different team. A veteran team where he can play 20 minutes per game for a defensive oriented coach. To have a Taj Gibson type of role and go from there. Lakers, Celtics.
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Anthony Randolph
Klomp wrote:Neon1 wrote:What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)
JJ Redick?
My thought as well. Don't know how their values line up - other assets may need to be involved.
Re: Anthony Randolph
- eyeteeth
- Starter
- Posts: 2,109
- And1: 147
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
- Location: somewhere on the Front Range
Re: Anthony Randolph
C.lupus wrote:Klomp wrote:Neon1 wrote:What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)
JJ Redick?
My thought as well. Don't know how their values line up - other assets may need to be involved.
I would be really happy to see Randolph thrive in Orlando if trading him brought us Redick. You out there, Mr. Kahn? Let's do this thing!

Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 796
- And1: 151
- Joined: Dec 13, 2002
-
Re: Anthony Randolph
Reddick?
Dear God, no.
Dear God, no.
Re: Anthony Randolph
- funfactor
- Junior
- Posts: 392
- And1: 76
- Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Re: Anthony Randolph
Reddick? we dont need another small guard, we need physical presence and good FG%. We dont need another ridnour. IMO We need Batum /Deng tipe of guy. (would't be nice?).
Talking about Randolph, i like the guy, i think he can develop his game and be useful for this team, lets give him more time to see what all mighty Adelman can do.
Talking about Randolph, i like the guy, i think he can develop his game and be useful for this team, lets give him more time to see what all mighty Adelman can do.
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: Anthony Randolph
KG_And1 wrote:Reddick?
Dear God, no.
What's your problem with having a Reddick on the team?
Re: Anthony Randolph
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,803
- And1: 22,392
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Anthony Randolph
funfactor wrote:Reddick? we dont need another small guard, we need physical presence and good FG%. We dont need another ridnour. IMO We need Batum /Deng tipe of guy. (would't be nice?).
Neither of them are SGs. If you want to trade assets so you can put a SF at SG, you might as well just keep Wes at SG.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Anthony Randolph
- funfactor
- Junior
- Posts: 392
- And1: 76
- Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Re: Anthony Randolph
Klomp wrote:funfactor wrote:Reddick? we dont need another small guard, we need physical presence and good FG%. We dont need another ridnour. IMO We need Batum /Deng tipe of guy. (would't be nice?).
Neither of them are SGs. If you want to trade assets so you can put a SF at SG, you might as well just keep Wes at SG.
you're right, my mistake.
BTW Adelman wants two ball handlers in the court, why not the Rudy Fernandez kind of animal?
looking for guards stats i've found a weird data, Tony Allen is having a season 46%FG and 42%3P!!!
reason: he has just hit 3 of 7 3Ps in the entire season.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves