ImageImageImage

Anthony Randolph

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

canucklife21
Junior
Posts: 257
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
   

Anthony Randolph 

Post#1 » by canucklife21 » Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:39 pm

What do wolves fan see the issues are with AR failure to be productive and our future center? from what ive seen lack of strength is killing him and the Lack of basketball iQ. I really had high hopes for him and wes thing year. Is adelman not giving him a proper chance? or is he even showing in practice he deserves it? We all just imgaine how good the wolves can be if AR just comes close to what we all thought. It brothers me so much of what type of player he can be. He would be perfect beside love for years! IF Deandre Jordan can pull together why cant AR. Hes more gifted more on the offence side of the ball and defence is all about desire and will. P.s By no means am i bashing Jordan however i know once he came into the league everyone thought he came to early from college and wasnt going to be what he is now and still developing .
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#2 » by Esohny » Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:51 pm

He's got a 10 cent brain.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,803
And1: 22,392
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#3 » by Klomp » Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:58 pm

See C.lupus sig
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 300
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#4 » by fattymcgee » Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:37 pm

The problem with Randolph playing center is that he's not a center! He never was a center and never will be a center. He's a soft power forward with little low post game and that's why he can never play center effectively. He could probably be a good PF on the right team, but that will never happen here with all of our PF's.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#5 » by Dewey » Sat Feb 4, 2012 8:36 pm

He's a role player. Period. He's never develop any inside or outside game or improved defensively. My biggest gripe with him is he does not play with any intensity. Don't need to say a word, but you need to show some emotion in your efforts (lose balls, charges, etc).

I remember a couple years ago there poster willing to give up solid assets to acquire AR ... :jawdrop:
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Piecake
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,885
And1: 264
Joined: Nov 13, 2010

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#6 » by Piecake » Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:12 pm

Dewey wrote:He's a role player. Period. He's never develop any inside or outside game or improved defensively. My biggest gripe with him is he does not play with any intensity. Don't need to say a word, but you need to show some emotion in your efforts (lose balls, charges, etc).

I remember a couple years ago there poster willing to give up solid assets to acquire AR ... :jawdrop:


Old REM would probably still give up solid assets to get magic randolph again :lol:
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#7 » by C.lupus » Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:18 pm

Magic Randolph for Dorell Wright. Do it.
User avatar
LOBO 7
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,447
And1: 49
Joined: Oct 30, 2008
Location: Thailand
   

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#8 » by LOBO 7 » Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:51 pm

Dewey wrote:He's a role player. Period. He's never develop any inside or outside game or improved defensively. My biggest gripe with him is he does not play with any intensity. Don't need to say a word, but you need to show some emotion in your efforts (lose balls, charges, etc).

I remember a couple years ago there poster willing to give up solid assets to acquire AR ... :jawdrop:


There are many things to criticize AR for, but I think that lack of intensity is not usually one of them. Most nights, he really throws himself around out there, trying to do too much, and showing lots of emotion. His problem is that he hasn't been able to let the game slow down for him, rushing things a lot of time and becoming frustrated too easily. If you want to see a lack of intensity or emotion, just look at Beas on most nights. In fact, intensity is one of the few things AR still has going for him, and I think there is still some potential for him to continue developing his chemistry with Rubio and becoming a solid option for us off the bench. We'll see. I don't exactly have high hopes for him, but I haven't completely written him off either.
Neon1
RealGM
Posts: 11,085
And1: 1,576
Joined: Dec 24, 2003
Location: The O
       

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#9 » by Neon1 » Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:04 pm

What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)
A smart coach once said, "Potential just means you're not good enough yet." Playing on potential is like living on air: It's essential, but if thats all you have, you're eventually going to starve.

Twitter: @CleonONE IG: @usaidwhatnah
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#10 » by Dewey » Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:13 pm

Neon1 wrote:What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)


Role player ... aka perimeter Defender.

However, with Darko nuring injury again, I'm not sure how he stacks up moving forward, and for all I know, we may look to start giving AR a little more involved with a more consistent role.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
teven_1
Rookie
Posts: 1,201
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 01, 2010

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#11 » by teven_1 » Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:28 pm

i always figured Randolph is a point forward.
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,803
And1: 22,392
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#12 » by Klomp » Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:42 pm

Neon1 wrote:What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)

JJ Redick?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
droponov
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,326
And1: 9
Joined: Jul 27, 2010

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#13 » by droponov » Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:47 pm

Just mentioned him in another thread while unaware of this one.

Randolph can be a stud but he needs to go to a different team. A veteran team where he can play 20 minutes per game for a defensive oriented coach. To have a Taj Gibson type of role and go from there. Lakers, Celtics.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#14 » by C.lupus » Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:51 pm

Klomp wrote:
Neon1 wrote:What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)

JJ Redick?

My thought as well. Don't know how their values line up - other assets may need to be involved.
User avatar
eyeteeth
Starter
Posts: 2,109
And1: 147
Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Location: somewhere on the Front Range

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#15 » by eyeteeth » Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:59 pm

C.lupus wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Neon1 wrote:What does it REALISTICALLY take to get him? I mean you guys really have no place for him at all. Seems like he would make a good backup PF behin Ryan Anderson (after we likely trade Dwight & Baby)

JJ Redick?

My thought as well. Don't know how their values line up - other assets may need to be involved.

I would be really happy to see Randolph thrive in Orlando if trading him brought us Redick. You out there, Mr. Kahn? Let's do this thing!
Image
KG_And1
Pro Prospect
Posts: 796
And1: 151
Joined: Dec 13, 2002
 

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#16 » by KG_And1 » Sun Feb 5, 2012 4:33 pm

Reddick?

Dear God, no.
User avatar
funfactor
Junior
Posts: 392
And1: 76
Joined: Dec 18, 2011

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#17 » by funfactor » Sun Feb 5, 2012 5:08 pm

Reddick? we dont need another small guard, we need physical presence and good FG%. We dont need another ridnour. IMO We need Batum /Deng tipe of guy. (would't be nice?).

Talking about Randolph, i like the guy, i think he can develop his game and be useful for this team, lets give him more time to see what all mighty Adelman can do.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#18 » by NewWolvesOrder » Sun Feb 5, 2012 5:12 pm

KG_And1 wrote:Reddick?

Dear God, no.


What's your problem with having a Reddick on the team?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,803
And1: 22,392
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#19 » by Klomp » Sun Feb 5, 2012 5:27 pm

funfactor wrote:Reddick? we dont need another small guard, we need physical presence and good FG%. We dont need another ridnour. IMO We need Batum /Deng tipe of guy. (would't be nice?).

Neither of them are SGs. If you want to trade assets so you can put a SF at SG, you might as well just keep Wes at SG.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
funfactor
Junior
Posts: 392
And1: 76
Joined: Dec 18, 2011

Re: Anthony Randolph 

Post#20 » by funfactor » Sun Feb 5, 2012 9:12 pm

Klomp wrote:
funfactor wrote:Reddick? we dont need another small guard, we need physical presence and good FG%. We dont need another ridnour. IMO We need Batum /Deng tipe of guy. (would't be nice?).

Neither of them are SGs. If you want to trade assets so you can put a SF at SG, you might as well just keep Wes at SG.

you're right, my mistake.

BTW Adelman wants two ball handlers in the court, why not the Rudy Fernandez kind of animal?

looking for guards stats i've found a weird data, Tony Allen is having a season 46%FG and 42%3P!!!
reason: he has just hit 3 of 7 3Ps in the entire season.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves