RealGM

"He's an offensive player, an extremely gifted offensive player, but if that's not going well for him, we still need him engaged in all the other areas," Adelman said. Beasley had played 20 minutes or less ever game since February 29 before injuring his toe, and that number is unlikely to increase until he improves the other aspects of his game.

SALT LAKE CITY - Michael Beasley went missing on Thursday night, but not because the Timberwolves forward had been traded to the Los Angeles Lakers.

He remains a Timberwolf for at least the rest of the season after Thursday's trade deadline came and went, but he didn't play against the Jazz because of a sore big toe injured Monday in Phoenix.

"I'm glad I'm here," he said. "More than anything, it has been a hassle. I got a nice house with a lot of things to move. That's just been a headache."

The Wolves, according to league sources, most seriously discussed a three-way trade with Portland and the Lakers that would have sent Beasley to L.A., a first-round pick from the Lakers to the Blazers and brought the Wolves shooting guard Jamal Crawford. But the deal collapsed when the Wolves refused to take back a contract -- most likely Derek Fisher's $3.4 million option for next season -- to save the Lakers luxury-tax payments.

Beasley will become a free agent this summer, most likely an unrestricted one because the Wolves would have to guarantee him a whopping $8 million qualifying offer to keep the right to match any offers he might receive.

"That's really not up to me," Beasley said about his future with the franchise. "I would like to stay here. We all know my contract is expiring. I might need a new contract, can't play for free. That's not up to me."

Point, counterpoint
Wolves coach Rick Adelman and David Kahn, president of basketball operations, met with Beasley after Thursday's 2 p.m. deadline passed. The basic message: Beasley's future is up to him.

"Michael is in more control of his future than even Michael recognizes," Kahn said. "These next six weeks are very important to him. Michael's made tremendous strides this year and I don't think leaguewide people recognize that: He has been much more engaged in practices, much better on the bench, his commitment, everything. He's been incident-free.

"I think it's very important these next six weeks that he continue that path and demonstrate to the league that maybe some of the things people have said about him frankly have been eradicated because I think in large part they have."

Two things
In that meeting, Beasley said he wants to play more in his role coming off the bench, and Adelman said he told Beasley that he needs to rebound and defend more consistently to earn that time.

"He's an offensive player, an extremely gifted offensive player, but if that's not going well for him, we still need him engaged in all the other areas," Adelman said. "He's the one guy, especially off the bench, who can really give us a spark these last 20 games."

He said it
Beasley said he's fine with his reserve role, but ...

"I just want to play basketball, that's it," he said. "We all got here playing ball. I just feel like the more I play, the more I produce. Just more time. That's my knack. Just put me on the floor and I make good things happen."

Etc.
• Believe it or not: Beasley claimed to be unaffected by all the trade talk that swirled around him for weeks. "I don't watch the sports channels or read the newspapers," he said. "I try to stay out of the world."

• Adelman is relieved the trade deadline has passed and Orlando's Dwight Howard stayed put. "That alone is going to be a relief, not having to listen to it," he said.

• The NCAA tournament started Thursday, but Wolves center Nikola Pekovic didn't fill out no stinking bracket. "We don't have that," said Pekovic, who's from Montenegro. "Our universities are only about educating."

Chosen01 wrote:I admit I don't watch that many T-wolves games, but from the games I've seen it looks like Beasley is trying a lot more on defense and rebounding than last year.Not exactly sure why the owner vetoed the trade if he won't play consistent minutes?

funkatron101 wrote:

Chosen01 wrote:I admit I don't watch that many T-wolves games, but from the games I've seen it looks like Beasley is trying a lot more on defense and rebounding than last year.Not exactly sure why the owner vetoed the trade if he won't play consistent minutes?

The rumor is we had to take back Fisher. Which would be really dumb.

Magic24 wrote:

funkatron101 wrote:

Chosen01 wrote:I admit I don't watch that many T-wolves games, but from the games I've seen it looks like Beasley is trying a lot more on defense and rebounding than last year.Not exactly sure why the owner vetoed the trade if he won't play consistent minutes?

The rumor is we had to take back Fisher. Which would be really dumb.

The Lakers and Blazers were willing to send back cash. You guys could have bought him out like Houston is doing.

Worm Guts wrote:That still takes up cap space.

Worm Guts wrote:That still takes up cap space.

LordBaldric wrote:That cap space only matters if they do something with it.

Worm Guts wrote:I'm sure they'll have to have pay him his entire contract. He has no incentive to take less.

Klomp wrote:

LordBaldric wrote:That cap space only matters if they do something with it.

But they can't do anything with it if they don't have it.

Is a possible two month rental of Crawford instead of Beasley, with no guarantee of playoffs even then, worth dipping into our cap space by another 3.4 million dollars? People around here are already freaking out about not having enough cap space.