Page 1 of 2

Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:23 pm
by youngthegiant
Denver trades: Wilson chandler

Minny trades: s&t Anthony Randolph, Wes johnson

Would you guys do this?

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:28 pm
by Krapinsky
youngthegiant wrote:Denver trades: Wilson chandler

Minny trades: s&t Anthony Randolph, Wes johnson

Would you guys do this?


I would have considered it before the hip tear. Same thing Flynn had. He was never the same again.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:37 pm
by moss_is_1
Krapinsky wrote:
youngthegiant wrote:Denver trades: Wilson chandler

Minny trades: s&t Anthony Randolph, Wes johnson

Would you guys do this?


I would have considered it before the hip tear. Same thing Flynn had. He was never the same again.

Either way, we aren't really giving anything up. Wes is probably not even worth his contract, and AR is in a crowded rotation.

Easy yes for me.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:58 pm
by C.lupus
I think we have enough injured players on the team. I'm not desparate enough to add another one.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:03 pm
by NewWolvesOrder
How about Afflalo instead of Chandler? Hip injury worries me and I think Nuggets may want to dump him cause it may look like a bad signing soon.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:14 pm
by Foye
C.lupus wrote:I think we have enough injured players on the team. I'm not desparate enough to add another one.


Well 50 games of Chandler is better than 82 games of Wes Johnson. It's not like Randolph is going to return anyway.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:28 pm
by NewWolvesOrder
Foye wrote:
C.lupus wrote:I think we have enough injured players on the team. I'm not desparate enough to add another one.


Well 50 games of Chandler is better than 82 games of Wes Johnson. It's not like Randolph is going to return anyway.


If Kahn issues a QO for him then he will. It's not like teams will be lining up to sign him to a large contract.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:36 pm
by Foye
Turnover_21 wrote:
Foye wrote:
C.lupus wrote:I think we have enough injured players on the team. I'm not desparate enough to add another one.


Well 50 games of Chandler is better than 82 games of Wes Johnson. It's not like Randolph is going to return anyway.


If Kahn issues a QO for him then he will. It's not like teams will be lining up to sign him to a large contract.


Why would Kahn issue a 4 mil. QO on a player that has been stuck in the rotation as 4th string PF for the majority of the year?

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:42 pm
by NewWolvesOrder
Foye wrote:
Why would Kahn issue a 4 mil. QO on a player that has been stuck in the rotation as 4th string PF for the majority of the year?


Because it's his guy. DK was thinking about Love for AR trade at some point. So you never know.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:44 pm
by Foye
Turnover_21 wrote:
Foye wrote:
Why would Kahn issue a 4 mil. QO on a player that has been stuck in the rotation as 4th string PF for the majority of the year?


Because it's his guy. DK was thinking about Love for AR trade at some point. So you never know.


This might have been a rumor but I don't think this was ever considered by the Wolves management.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:56 pm
by dunkonu21
I have a man crush on Wilson Chandler so the answer is obv to me.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:45 pm
by touchedbyPek
I'd do it only if I knew we weren't keeping Randolph. But I thought sign and trades weren't allowed anymore?

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:14 am
by Devilzsidewalk
anything around Wes for Chandler is thumbs up from me

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:14 am
by urinesane
Foye wrote:
Turnover_21 wrote:
Foye wrote:
Why would Kahn issue a 4 mil. QO on a player that has been stuck in the rotation as 4th string PF for the majority of the year?


Because it's his guy. DK was thinking about Love for AR trade at some point. So you never know.


This might have been a rumor but I don't think this was ever considered by the Wolves management.


It was 100% a rumor.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:47 am
by youngthegiant
would you guys trade the jazz 1st for wilson chandler?

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:53 am
by Krapinsky
youngthegiant wrote:would you guys trade the jazz 1st for wilson chandler?


I think we'd all much rather trade Wes & AR.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:56 am
by youngthegiant
what about this

Denver Trades: Danilo Gallinari, timofey mozgov

Minnesota trades: Derrick Williams, jazz 1st, wesley johnson

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:22 am
by Mattya
youngthegiant wrote:what about this

Denver Trades: Danilo Gallinari, timofey mozgov

Minnesota trades: Derrick Williams, jazz 1st, wesley johnson

I enjoy this poster. Gallo on this team would kill other teams. Lets just call ourselves the Wannabe Old School Kings.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:27 am
by moss_is_1
youngthegiant wrote:what about this

Denver Trades: Danilo Gallinari, timofey mozgov

Minnesota trades: Derrick Williams, jazz 1st, wesley johnson

Yes please. I think that would be a great deal for us.

Gallo is one of my favorite players. Good defender, good playmaker, good shooter, and is pretty efficient. He could be our #2 scorer that we need on the wing. Mozgov would be a pretty nice backup center as well.

Re: Denver trade offer

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:37 am
by Devilzsidewalk
Wes, the jazz 1st, whatever I'd trade either/or and probably both. "Why?" you're not asking me? because you're all thinking that pick is going to be Austin Rivers or whatever, but whats going to happen is Rivers will be there, Kahn will take him. And we'll all be THRILLED. 10 minutes later Rivers will be traded for the rights to Fabulous Melo and a future 1st, and we'll say "oh i'm absolutely tickled pink because that future 1st will be awesome and we needed a center and Rivers is overrated anyways and blah blah blah" and 20 minutes later the rights to Fab Melo will be traded for some dude in the 2nd round who's knee is deteriorating as we speak and the curse continues and we'll all be here next year in game threads and we'll be down by 4 at the half to the celtics and Klomp will say "Down by only 4 at the half when Love is out with a mustache strain? I'll take that!" Then the Celtics will go on a 45 - 5 run as usual, then the Wolves will climb back to down by 9 and Calinks will say "first to 100 rule in effect...[Celtics get to 100 first]... damn you Telly Hughes!" and Wolves lose 118-104. This happens every year