RealGM

I was curious about this, so decided to do some late night research.

If people are interested, I may continue this through the season.


Game 1: vs. Sacramento

Ridnour - 20:29
Roy - 30:14
Kirilenko - 30:36
Williams - 21:10
Pekovic - 31:49
------
Barea - 27:31
Cunningham - 25:28
Budinger - 21:29
Stiemsma - 16:11
Shved - 15:03
Amundson - DNP
Conroy - DNP
Lee - DNP

Game 2: at Toronto

Ridnour - 32:22
Roy - 21:50
Kirilenko - 28:33
Williams - 25:39
Pekovic - 28:56
------
Shved - 22:01
Budinger - 20:49
Cunningham - 19:07
Stiemsma - 17:01
Conroy - 8:03
Barea - 7:35
Amundson - 4:02
Lee - 4:02

Game 3: at Brooklyn

Ridnour - 19:00
Roy - 28:56
Kirilenko - 32:51
Williams - 18:18
Pekovic - 26:12
------
Barea - 29:35
Cunningham - 26:16
Budinger - 25:56
Shved - 17:41
Stiemsma - 9:43
Amundson - 5:31
Conroy - DNP
Lee - DNP

Game 4: vs. Orlando

Ridnour - 30:36
Roy - 26:04
Kirilenko - 30:40
Williams - 30:00
Pekovic - 25:04
------
Stiemsma - 21:03
Shved - 17:15
Budinger - 17:12
Cunningham - 13:30
Barea - 12:21
Amundson - 6:28
Conroy - 5:03
Lee - 4:44

Besides that terrible lineup in the second game when he had all of the bench players in there with Conroy instead of Barea (thanks to the concussion), ive been fine with how he has substituted and divvied up the minutes

Is there a reason why Williams is not only starting but playing 20+ minutes a game. The guy is terrible from what I've seen.

dho4ever wrote:Is there a reason why Williams is not only starting but playing 20+ minutes a game. The guy is terrible from what I've seen.

He was the #2 overall pick. I think the organization would like to give him the opportunity to succeed.

Game 4: vs. Orlando

Ridnour - 30:36
Roy - 26:04
Kirilenko - 30:40
Williams - 30:00
Pekovic - 25:04
------
Stiemsma - 21:03
Shved - 17:15
Budinger - 17:12
Cunningham - 13:30
Barea - 12:21
Amundson - 6:28
Conroy - 5:03
Lee - 4:44

If you're up for it, it might be more valuable to see this as a table

I could never get the formatting right under code, but maybe you know how. Formatting it this way would still allow someone to see minutes distribution for a single game, but also make it easy to track a single player over multiple games.

shrink wrote:If you're up for it, it might be more valuable to see this as a table

I could never get the formatting right under code, but maybe you know how. Formatting it this way would still allow someone to see minutes distribution for a single game, but also make it easy to track a single player over multiple games.

It's easy enough to have an excel table with players listed vertically and games listed horizontally:
Name GM1 GM2 GM3 etc...
Rubio 12 32 27
Love 30 32 38
Roy 20 22 24
etc...