ImageImageImage

If you had a do-over......

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

MN7725
Veteran
Posts: 2,669
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#61 » by MN7725 » Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:09 pm

walk with me wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
Might be true, playoff success likely comes only from KAT/Wig improvement. Everything else is probably secondary

But again, I was just dumbfounded that Wolves came out of the offseason with two legit wings, so any move that resulted in that I'm going to disagree with


Other key points are hindsight is 20/20 and the grass is always greener.

Guys like George Hill, CJ miles and Pat Patterson sound good on paper but what are they actually doing where they are at?

Majority hated the taj signing and he’s currently the obvious most consistent player of the short season. Not only that but pat Patterson has been trash this season.

Everyone hated (and still hates) the Teague signing but he’s delivering on what we got him for which was 3 point shooting and assists. George Hill has been garbage this year (I have him on fantasy. Pure crap). Jrue and Lowry have picked up recently but would have required an additional 5-10 million on top of what Teague was paid.


it’s easy to say “if we could go back” but overall the moves are working fine so far. Only issues are growing pains and pre existing problems. Wiggins inconsistent midrange and kats defensive lapses. Fix those two issues and a few of the L’s are W’s


No hindsight by me

Argued against Teague when he was signed immediately at deadline, frankly lost my mind haha
Argued against Taj when he was signed as being redundant with Dieng (and his production is shockingly similar to Dieng's previous two years)

They're are both good players, and doing as well as expected.
But there was an opportunity cost at wing

I don't see how anyone can argue there wasn't. The Wolves only had room exception and minimum contracts (or Aldrich/OKC pick trade) to fill out behind Butler/Wig

The bench is bad because Crawford and Bazz aren't good (no surprise), and we have seen what team looks like when Butler (and probably when Wig) misses a game. It's just crippling and expecting both to stay healthy all year isn't a plan, its hope.

And the wing issue will become more glaring in playoffs
walk with me
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,549
And1: 4,349
Joined: Dec 01, 2013

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#62 » by walk with me » Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:23 pm

MN7725 wrote:
walk with me wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
Might be true, playoff success likely comes only from KAT/Wig improvement. Everything else is probably secondary

But again, I was just dumbfounded that Wolves came out of the offseason with two legit wings, so any move that resulted in that I'm going to disagree with


Other key points are hindsight is 20/20 and the grass is always greener.

Guys like George Hill, CJ miles and Pat Patterson sound good on paper but what are they actually doing where they are at?

Majority hated the taj signing and he’s currently the obvious most consistent player of the short season. Not only that but pat Patterson has been trash this season.

Everyone hated (and still hates) the Teague signing but he’s delivering on what we got him for which was 3 point shooting and assists. George Hill has been garbage this year (I have him on fantasy. Pure crap). Jrue and Lowry have picked up recently but would have required an additional 5-10 million on top of what Teague was paid.


it’s easy to say “if we could go back” but overall the moves are working fine so far. Only issues are growing pains and pre existing problems. Wiggins inconsistent midrange and kats defensive lapses. Fix those two issues and a few of the L’s are W’s


No hindsight by me

Argued against Teague when he was signed immediately at deadline, frankly lost my mind haha
Argued against Taj when he was signed as being redundant with Dieng (and his production is shockingly similar to Dieng's previous two years)

They're are both good players, and doing as well as expected.
But there was an opportunity cost at wing

I don't see how anyone can argue there wasn't. The Wolves only had room exception and minimum contracts (or Aldrich/OKC pick trade) to fill out behind Butler/Wig

The bench is bad because Crawford and Bazz aren't good (no surprise), and we have seen what team looks like when Butler (and probably when Wig) misses a game. It's just crippling and expecting both to stay healthy all year isn't a plan, its hope.

And the wing issue will become more glaring in playoffs


I meant generally, not by you. The absolute roof for this core in 2 seasons in 2nd round of the playoffs. I don’t think any hindsight moves could guaranteed two wcsf births consecutively. Although it’s not impossible, just unlikely.
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,550
And1: 3,716
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#63 » by FinnTheHuman » Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:24 pm

MN7725 wrote:
walk with me wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
Might be true, playoff success likely comes only from KAT/Wig improvement. Everything else is probably secondary

But again, I was just dumbfounded that Wolves came out of the offseason with two legit wings, so any move that resulted in that I'm going to disagree with


Other key points are hindsight is 20/20 and the grass is always greener.

Guys like George Hill, CJ miles and Pat Patterson sound good on paper but what are they actually doing where they are at?

Majority hated the taj signing and he’s currently the obvious most consistent player of the short season. Not only that but pat Patterson has been trash this season.

Everyone hated (and still hates) the Teague signing but he’s delivering on what we got him for which was 3 point shooting and assists. George Hill has been garbage this year (I have him on fantasy. Pure crap). Jrue and Lowry have picked up recently but would have required an additional 5-10 million on top of what Teague was paid.


it’s easy to say “if we could go back” but overall the moves are working fine so far. Only issues are growing pains and pre existing problems. Wiggins inconsistent midrange and kats defensive lapses. Fix those two issues and a few of the L’s are W’s


No hindsight by me

Argued against Teague when he was signed immediately at deadline, frankly lost my mind haha
Argued against Taj when he was signed as being redundant with Dieng (and his production is shockingly similar to Dieng's previous two years)

They're are both good players, and doing as well as expected.
But there was an opportunity cost at wing

I don't see how anyone can argue there wasn't. The Wolves only had room exception and minimum contracts (or Aldrich/OKC pick trade) to fill out behind Butler/Wig

The bench is bad because Crawford and Bazz aren't good (no surprise), and we have seen what team looks like when Butler (and probably when Wig) misses a game. It's just crippling and expecting both to stay healthy all year isn't a plan, its hope.

And the wing issue will become more glaring in playoffs


I feel we'll be able to get a decent backup wing around the trade deadline come the all star week, maybe something around J. Simmons and OKC 1st, because Magic won't make the PO this year either it seems.

To me, the issue will always be that we signed Teague instead of Lowry. We just had to max Lowry, and no hindsight by me either, been saying that before we signed Teague non-stop. We'd be in the tier of a few teams who'd actually have an outside chance of contesting Warriors in a PO series with Lowry, he's that good individually, and even better as a fit. And I don't wanna get into the topic of Taylor's cheapness and lux tax issues, you ain't contending if you don't go into lux tax territory in today's NBA.
Streakers33
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,921
And1: 202
Joined: Mar 17, 2014

If you had a do-over...... 

Post#64 » by Streakers33 » Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:34 am

Hmmm.. this will be fun to add to..

Butler deal. U have to do that. It’s a super star league and we didn’t have one... and your trading potential for proven. All teams that want to win do this..

Sign Gibson? Sure.. I’m ok with this. Thibs wants his guy.. on his deal. Ok that’s with me..
what I don’t like, is by over paying for all your bigs u put a jam on the money u can spend later. When signing or talking about signing Gibson, Patton and Cole should have been moved, to show that as a gm. U are still planning ahead..

Trade Rubio? Sure for cap space and a first? Might as well get some solid value out of him if u don’t want him on your team.. it is his team.. that’s why I’m ok With this..

Teague? No.. I think I would have left cap space open . The rumors of Carmelo, pg13 were very active . Boston has to trade someone to sign Hayward, and I would have aggressively tried to offer that cap space and okc pick for those players first.. and after striking out, find a comparable player.. knowing tyus needs more mins anyways or why have him?


After seeing the proudness (is that a word?) of thibs during the whole butler coming to town.. scoring another “super star” because teams are dumping them, would have put thibs on a statue , and instead we are discussing if he is even a god coach anymore ??

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,094
And1: 10,529
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#65 » by Worm Guts » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:34 pm

Streakers33 wrote:

Trade Rubio? Sure for cap space and a first? Might as well get some solid value out of him if u don’t want him on your team.. it is his team.. that’s why I’m ok With this..

Teague? No.. I think I would have left cap space open . The rumors of Carmelo, pg13 were very active . Boston has to trade someone to sign Hayward, and I would have aggressively tried to offer that cap space and okc pick for those players first.. and after striking out, find a comparable player.. knowing tyus needs more mins anyways or why have him?



You can't just trade Rubio and not sign a replacement PG. Tyus hadn't really even proven himself as a backup.
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,550
And1: 3,716
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#66 » by FinnTheHuman » Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:55 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
Streakers33 wrote:

Trade Rubio? Sure for cap space and a first? Might as well get some solid value out of him if u don’t want him on your team.. it is his team.. that’s why I’m ok With this..

Teague? No.. I think I would have left cap space open . The rumors of Carmelo, pg13 were very active . Boston has to trade someone to sign Hayward, and I would have aggressively tried to offer that cap space and okc pick for those players first.. and after striking out, find a comparable player.. knowing tyus needs more mins anyways or why have him?



You can't just trade Rubio and not sign a replacement PG. Tyus hadn't really even proven himself as a backup.


Why do you sign one so quickly, and why is the only one who doesn't play defense out of a bunch?
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,094
And1: 10,529
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#67 » by Worm Guts » Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:00 pm

FinnTheHuman wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
Streakers33 wrote:

Trade Rubio? Sure for cap space and a first? Might as well get some solid value out of him if u don’t want him on your team.. it is his team.. that’s why I’m ok With this..

Teague? No.. I think I would have left cap space open . The rumors of Carmelo, pg13 were very active . Boston has to trade someone to sign Hayward, and I would have aggressively tried to offer that cap space and okc pick for those players first.. and after striking out, find a comparable player.. knowing tyus needs more mins anyways or why have him?



You can't just trade Rubio and not sign a replacement PG. Tyus hadn't really even proven himself as a backup.


Why do you sign one so quickly, and why is the only one who doesn't play defense out of a bunch?


I don't really want to get into who we should have gotten as our starting PG, it just couldn't have been Tyus at that point even if he turns out to be a serviceable starting PG.
User avatar
Zeitgeister
General Manager
Posts: 8,226
And1: 5,850
Joined: Nov 11, 2008
   

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#68 » by Zeitgeister » Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:03 pm

Well, weren't the two guys that were better than Teague, Lowry and Jrue Holiday? Both of those guys signed massive contracts with their home teams, probably weren't reasonably attainable. It's not like these guys don't speak about this stuff before the day free agency opens up.
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,255
And1: 14,636
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#69 » by shrink » Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:08 pm

FinnTheHuman wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
Streakers33 wrote:

Trade Rubio? Sure for cap space and a first? Might as well get some solid value out of him if u don’t want him on your team.. it is his team.. that’s why I’m ok With this..

Teague? No.. I think I would have left cap space open . The rumors of Carmelo, pg13 were very active . Boston has to trade someone to sign Hayward, and I would have aggressively tried to offer that cap space and okc pick for those players first.. and after striking out, find a comparable player.. knowing tyus needs more mins anyways or why have him?



You can't just trade Rubio and not sign a replacement PG. Tyus hadn't really even proven himself as a backup.


Why do you sign one so quickly, and why is the only one who doesn't play defense out of a bunch?

You sign him quickly because there were less free agent PG's available than there were teams that needed them. There are probably 22-24 good starting PG's in the league, so it makes it feel like there are plenty, because so many teams have a good one. However, if you are one of the teams that doesn't have one, you are in pretty bad shape. Maybe some of the 2017 Lottery PG rookies will reach that level, but a team like ours that has playoff ambitions in the tough West desperately needs to lock up one of those PG's.

I agree with you on the need for defense, and I think the reason we signed Teague was money. George Hill turned down an extension for $27 mil a year, Lowry and Jrue wanted max money, so getting Teague early, and at $19, was a key factor. In Thibs defense, Teague has been the best possible signing of the four, considering dollars for production. However, we still aren't maximizing him, because his best attribute is scoring, and we already have plenty of scorers.

Personally, I think Rubio would do a better job on this team, even thoug we wouldn't be maximizing his best skill (passing) either. Clearly, Thibs wanted to move on. I think when the December 15th date rolls around, and Teague is eligible to be traded, you listen to offers. Since Thibs plays the starters so much, the biggest impact from a trade would be to insert a different starter, and the other 4 are all locked in. I doubt we see a trade, but Teague has done enough to be tradable on his $19 mil deal.
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
Tukkerwolf
Starter
Posts: 2,427
And1: 2,178
Joined: Nov 07, 2014
 

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#70 » by Tukkerwolf » Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:36 pm

As much as this team frustrates me (a lot) it's because I have expectations. And let's be honest, without all those moves we'd once again would be hovering around a .400 record.
walk with me
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,549
And1: 4,349
Joined: Dec 01, 2013

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#71 » by walk with me » Thu Nov 30, 2017 5:16 pm

Question to those who vote do over.

What alternatives would you have liked to see? These is what I feel like I’ve seen so far

A- Rubio butler Wiggins taj Kat same bench
B- Same team as last year w/Markenen
C - Teague jimmy Wiggins Kat Patterson same bench
D - Max Lowry/Holiday jimmy Wiggins Kat taj aame bench
E - Hill Wiggins Butler Kat taj same bench


I’m just trying to envision what scenario you redo that delivers a obviously superior team. My only regret about this off-season is that we didn’t get Dante Cunningham.

He’s exactly what the team is missing.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,255
And1: 14,636
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#72 » by shrink » Thu Nov 30, 2017 5:38 pm

With the benefit of hindsight, Paul Milsap, George Hill, and Patterson were all cheaper deals, because they got paid at the end of free agency when money was running out. Maybe they would have produced better here. But it's an unfair comparison, because omce he traded for Jimmy, Thibs wanted to lock in a contending team and couldn't afford to wait.
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
User avatar
PharmD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,953
And1: 5,536
Joined: Aug 21, 2015
 

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#73 » by PharmD » Fri Dec 1, 2017 2:33 am

walk with me wrote:Question to those who vote do over.

What alternatives would you have liked to see? These is what I feel like I’ve seen so far

A- Rubio butler Wiggins taj Kat same bench
B- Same team as last year w/Markenen
C - Teague jimmy Wiggins Kat Patterson same bench
D - Max Lowry/Holiday jimmy Wiggins Kat taj aame bench
E - Hill Wiggins Butler Kat taj same bench


I’m just trying to envision what scenario you redo that delivers a obviously superior team. My only regret about this off-season is that we didn’t get Dante Cunningham.

He’s exactly what the team is missing.

B plus put the $33M in cap space to use.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,094
And1: 10,529
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#74 » by Worm Guts » Fri Dec 1, 2017 2:43 am

The most obvious thing we screwed up was giving Gorgui an extension at beginning of last season. Completely ignoring that we could have paid him less, his cap hold would have been about 10 million less than his extension. We could have signed CJ Miles or made a better run at one of the bigger FA with that money, then signed Gorgui to go over the cap.
User avatar
PharmD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,953
And1: 5,536
Joined: Aug 21, 2015
 

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#75 » by PharmD » Fri Dec 1, 2017 2:46 am

Worm Guts wrote:The most obvious thing we screwed up was giving Gorgui an extension at beginning of last season. Completely ignoring that we could have paid him less, his cap hold would have been about 10 million less than his extension. We could have signed CJ Miles or made a better run at one of the bigger FA with that money, then signed Gorgui to go over the cap.

Yeah. We were assuming that this offseason was gonna be crazy again and therefore we'd be getting Gorgui at a discount. But the cap went from 108 to 99 and thus nobody had much cap space and it was a terrible market for FAs.

Also, Thibs must not have liked what he got from Gorgui last year seeing how he spent 100% of our cap space on Gorgui's replacement.
MN7725
Veteran
Posts: 2,669
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#76 » by MN7725 » Fri Dec 1, 2017 3:37 am

PharmD wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:The most obvious thing we screwed up was giving Gorgui an extension at beginning of last season. Completely ignoring that we could have paid him less, his cap hold would have been about 10 million less than his extension. We could have signed CJ Miles or made a better run at one of the bigger FA with that money, then signed Gorgui to go over the cap.

Yeah. We were assuming that this offseason was gonna be crazy again and therefore we'd be getting Gorgui at a discount. But the cap went from 108 to 99 and thus nobody had much cap space and it was a terrible market for FAs.

Also, Thibs must not have liked what he got from Gorgui last year seeing how he spent 100% of our cap space on Gorgui's replacement.


At the time of the extension, the cap was projected at $102 mil and only about 10 teams were projected to have $$ available to offer Dieng's 1st year extension salary number

July 7 2016
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/nba-lowers-2017-18-cap-projection-to-102-million/

None of whom really made sense to offer a soon to be 28 yr old RFA a large contract, since it was bad/rebuilding tams that would favor cap flexibility or upside players, or teams like Bos/MIA that had obvious bigger targets

It was very educational to see who in national media thought that extension made sense and who didn't, could see who actually pays attention to the #s and $. Nate Duncan, Tim Bontemps, Sam Vecenie I can remember specifically criticizing it at the time.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 26,570
And1: 6,397
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#77 » by Crazy-Canuck » Fri Dec 1, 2017 3:37 am

Speaking of Gorguis deal, thank GOD Bazz didnt take that 40 mill when Thibs offered it to him.
T-wOlvEs 420
Pro Prospect
Posts: 762
And1: 165
Joined: Nov 30, 2013

Re: RE: Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#78 » by T-wOlvEs 420 » Sat Dec 2, 2017 1:29 am

PharmD wrote:
walk with me wrote:Question to those who vote do over.

What alternatives would you have liked to see? These is what I feel like I’ve seen so far

A- Rubio butler Wiggins taj Kat same bench
B- Same team as last year w/Markenen
C - Teague jimmy Wiggins Kat Patterson same bench
D - Max Lowry/Holiday jimmy Wiggins Kat taj aame bench
E - Hill Wiggins Butler Kat taj same bench


I’m just trying to envision what scenario you redo that delivers a obviously superior team. My only regret about this off-season is that we didn’t get Dante Cunningham.

He’s exactly what the team is missing.

B plus put the $33M in cap space to use.

But Wiggins Max kicks in next year and Towns Max when he signs will kick in the following year.. so that 33 mill.. had to be used now

Sent from my SM-G930T using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
PharmD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,953
And1: 5,536
Joined: Aug 21, 2015
 

Re: RE: Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#79 » by PharmD » Sat Dec 2, 2017 1:30 am

T-wOlvEs 420 wrote:
PharmD wrote:
walk with me wrote:Question to those who vote do over.

What alternatives would you have liked to see? These is what I feel like I’ve seen so far

A- Rubio butler Wiggins taj Kat same bench
B- Same team as last year w/Markenen
C - Teague jimmy Wiggins Kat Patterson same bench
D - Max Lowry/Holiday jimmy Wiggins Kat taj aame bench
E - Hill Wiggins Butler Kat taj same bench


I’m just trying to envision what scenario you redo that delivers a obviously superior team. My only regret about this off-season is that we didn’t get Dante Cunningham.

He’s exactly what the team is missing.

B plus put the $33M in cap space to use.

But Wiggins Max kicks in next year and Towns Max when he signs will kick in the following year.. so that 33 mill.. had to be used now

Sent from my SM-G930T using RealGM mobile app

well right. It had to be used this last offseason.
T-wOlvEs 420
Pro Prospect
Posts: 762
And1: 165
Joined: Nov 30, 2013

Re: If you had a do-over...... 

Post#80 » by T-wOlvEs 420 » Sat Dec 2, 2017 1:36 am

O my fault.. I misunderstood

Sent from my SM-G930T using RealGM mobile app

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves