Neeva wrote:Nwa is almost 21:/ I am not sure why he is getting hyped, he looks like he will be an average role player.
NWA was a rap group. I think you mean NAW .
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Neeva wrote:Nwa is almost 21:/ I am not sure why he is getting hyped, he looks like he will be an average role player.
Neeva wrote:Nwa is almost 21:/ I am not sure why he is getting hyped, he looks like he will be an average role player.
Norseman79 wrote:Neeva wrote:Nwa is almost 21:/ I am not sure why he is getting hyped, he looks like he will be an average role player.
Who is hyping him? He seems to be a solid combo guard with potential as a point. No one is saying the kid is any type of a star. He just seems like a solid, smart basketball player. Kind of like a bigger Tyus with a better 3pt shot.
life_saver wrote:Why on earth are people till using FG% as a metric in 2019 to measure a player's efficiency?? Steph Curry, who is probably the most efficient volume scorer in NBA history has FG% of 47%...you can't use FG% to measure efficiency of players whose majority of shot attempts are 3's..Almost half of Saric's FGAs are from 3. Just use EFG% or TS%....Saric's EFG% during his time at Wolves has been 54% and his TS% so far at Wolves has been 58%. He has been shooting 38.3% from 3 and 51.1% from 2. These are very good efficiency numbers. He can be bit streaky with his shooting but on the whole, he has had good season efficiency wise.
life_saver wrote:Why on earth are people till using FG% as a metric in 2019 to measure a player's efficiency?? Steph Curry, who is probably the most efficient volume scorer in NBA history has FG% of 47%...you can't use FG% to measure efficiency of players whose majority of shot attempts are 3's..Almost half of Saric's FGAs are from 3. Just use EFG% or TS%....Saric's EFG% during his time at Wolves has been 54% and his TS% so far at Wolves has been 58%. He has been shooting 38.3% from 3 and 51.1% from 2. These are very good efficiency numbers. He can be bit streaky with his shooting but on the whole, he has had good season efficiency wise.
Neeva wrote:Norseman79 wrote:Neeva wrote:Nwa is almost 21:/ I am not sure why he is getting hyped, he looks like he will be an average role player.
Who is hyping him? He seems to be a solid combo guard with potential as a point. No one is saying the kid is any type of a star. He just seems like a solid, smart basketball player. Kind of like a bigger Tyus with a better 3pt shot.
People that want him to be the wolves pick at 11?
Honestly I expect this year and next year to be the last years in the lottery( while Kat is on this team)so the wolves need to shoot for STARS not role players.
Norseman79 wrote:Neeva wrote:Norseman79 wrote:
Who is hyping him? He seems to be a solid combo guard with potential as a point. No one is saying the kid is any type of a star. He just seems like a solid, smart basketball player. Kind of like a bigger Tyus with a better 3pt shot.
People that want him to be the wolves pick at 11?
Honestly I expect this year and next year to be the last years in the lottery( while Kat is on this team)so the wolves need to shoot for STARS not role players.
That's great, but unless Little or Douyombouya drop, there are not stars at 11. NAW has as much chance as anyone else in that range.
Neeva wrote:Norseman79 wrote:Neeva wrote:
People that want him to be the wolves pick at 11?
Honestly I expect this year and next year to be the last years in the lottery( while Kat is on this team)so the wolves need to shoot for STARS not role players.
That's great, but unless Little or Douyombouya drop, there are not stars at 11. NAW has as much chance as anyone else in that range.
One of Bol, Little, Doumbouya will drop to the wolves that is who they should take.
NAW i would not even take at 20 in last years draft.
KGdaBom wrote:life_saver wrote:Why on earth are people till using FG% as a metric in 2019 to measure a player's efficiency?? Steph Curry, who is probably the most efficient volume scorer in NBA history has FG% of 47%...you can't use FG% to measure efficiency of players whose majority of shot attempts are 3's..Almost half of Saric's FGAs are from 3. Just use EFG% or TS%....Saric's EFG% during his time at Wolves has been 54% and his TS% so far at Wolves has been 58%. He has been shooting 38.3% from 3 and 51.1% from 2. These are very good efficiency numbers. He can be bit streaky with his shooting but on the whole, he has had good season efficiency wise.
Sorry, but you're wrong. Geek Freak has informed us all that Saric's flat shot is completely broken and beyond repair. It is inconceivable that Geek Freak could be wrong.
GeekFreak wrote:KGdaBom wrote:life_saver wrote:Why on earth are people till using FG% as a metric in 2019 to measure a player's efficiency?? Steph Curry, who is probably the most efficient volume scorer in NBA history has FG% of 47%...you can't use FG% to measure efficiency of players whose majority of shot attempts are 3's..Almost half of Saric's FGAs are from 3. Just use EFG% or TS%....Saric's EFG% during his time at Wolves has been 54% and his TS% so far at Wolves has been 58%. He has been shooting 38.3% from 3 and 51.1% from 2. These are very good efficiency numbers. He can be bit streaky with his shooting but on the whole, he has had good season efficiency wise.
Sorry, but you're wrong. Geek Freak has informed us all that Saric's flat shot is completely broken and beyond repair. It is inconceivable that Geek Freak could be wrong.
Do you guys even watch the games? Saric is a 6'10" power forward, he gets the same shots at the rim that Taj Gibson gets, Taj always makes them, Dario always misses them. And his 3's are usually very open looks. You can't compare him to guards and or primary scorers who get all of the defenses attention and have to take tough shots like Curry. You can't compare Curry taking a 30 footer with a defender in his face to Dario taking an open 24 footer.
Neeva wrote:Norseman79 wrote:Neeva wrote:
People that want him to be the wolves pick at 11?
Honestly I expect this year and next year to be the last years in the lottery( while Kat is on this team)so the wolves need to shoot for STARS not role players.
That's great, but unless Little or Douyombouya drop, there are not stars at 11. NAW has as much chance as anyone else in that range.
One of Bol, Little, Doumbouya will drop to the wolves that is who they should take.
NAW i would not even take at 20 in last years draft.
Norseman79 wrote:Neeva wrote:Norseman79 wrote:
That's great, but unless Little or Douyombouya drop, there are not stars at 11. NAW has as much chance as anyone else in that range.
One of Bol, Little, Doumbouya will drop to the wolves that is who they should take.
NAW i would not even take at 20 in last years draft.
Nothing wrong with swinging for the fences, I think either Little or Doumbouya would be fine off the bench and maybe develop into something, you are basing it off of potential, again, which is fine, but not promised. I wouldn't touch Bol.
Norseman79 wrote:Bottom line is whoever we draft at 11 is likely starting out as a backup, Little is not starting over Roco, Doumbouya is not starting over Saric, NAW is not starting over Teague.
Norseman79 wrote:While I have preached tolerance of the Wolves pick, Hachimura would make me puke. Stupid pick.
UnFadeable21 wrote:?s=21
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves