minimus wrote:If Nowell was at least 6'5" with 6'9" wignspan, he could already start over Martin and Culver.
Well I don't think Nowell should Start anything. Just like Culver and Martin probably shouldn't have yet. Certainly not Culver. But Nowell is a SG, and maybe a SG/PG combo. Which is what I claimed this summer and likewise, I claimed Culver was a SG/SF like Martin. Arguing for months with those claiming Culver was the next PG to save us.
Between Culver, Martin, Okogie, Beasley and whoever else you want to throw in there, not a single one of them were able to stop or slow Ross, couldn't stop Fultz either. This fairytale that these guys are all so good on defense due to size that they can't be taken off the court is just as fake as the one that was being constantly told about Graham as he started so often and continued to get minutes failure after failure earlier this season.
There is no reason Nowell has to be an all nba defender, and there is no reason he can't be one yet. After all our two max players are about as far from being all NBA defenders as starters get. Nothing is stopping Beasley from being a good player and he doesn't have a 6'9 wingspan. He has a 6-6 to 6-7 wingspan as far as reports go I've seen.
...Standing at just 6'5 and with a wingspan of 6'7, he lacks ideal tools for an NBA wing on defense. The ability to defend multiple positions is at a premium right now, but Beasley lacks the strength to move up to small forward and doesn't have the length to defend lead guards.
Nowell has a
. Apparently they both averaged 15 pts and 5 rebounds in college. Might be very similar, although I know Nowell has a floater Beasley would wish he had. Beasley has 3 or 4 years of experience and confidence.
I suppose it's only ok for Beasley to be just a SG because he was once a FRP (19)?
Maybe Nowell could be Beasleys direct backup. Much like so many want Reid to be Towns direct backup. Because they are so similar.