shrink wrote:I asked KLOMP
PM him next time. He might let your snake oil by in private.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
shrink wrote:I asked KLOMP
Jedzz wrote:shrink wrote:then you make a Couple strawman arguments like I must think Durant must “suck” because he didn’t make elite criteria in 3 point shooting.
It's not strawman at all. Durant shot 3s worse than Beasley did at the same 5 attempts per game in the same season. So obviously you think Durant isn't an elite shooter either. MLE limit for Durant right? Is Durant a defensive juggernaut? Bear hugging Towns until Durant falls to the floor? That guy? He's a scoring star making ching, just a little bit shy of what a young Beasley can shoot it seems.
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
shrink wrote:Jedzz wrote:shrink wrote:then you make a Couple strawman arguments like I must think Durant must “suck” because he didn’t make elite criteria in 3 point shooting.
It's not strawman at all. Durant shot 3s worse than Beasley did at the same 5 attempts per game in the same season. So obviously you think Durant isn't an elite shooter either. MLE limit for Durant right? Is Durant a defensive juggernaut? Bear hugging Towns until Durant falls to the floor? That guy? He's a scoring star making ching, just a little bit shy of what a young Beasley can shoot it seems.
If you think all non-elite shooters get the MLE, you’re a moron. Did you know other skills affect the overall value of a player? If you think I said differently, you are just saying it because you are angry and pouting.
shrink wrote:I realize this is the internet, but this is generally an adult forum, and as many have told you, time and again, your immaturity and intellectual dishonesty has made you a pariah among several posters here.
Bye bye - contact me again in five years when you’re older and have developed some self-respect. Right now, I won’t waste time giving you attention for this behavior.
wolves_89 wrote:My question on Beasley relates to his market. There are likely only 6 teams with cap space this off-season and of those I see little chance that PHX, MIA, or ATL make him an offer. Of the remaining teams NYK has Barret at SG, DET has Kennard, and CHO is still paying Batum. Even if a team is looking for a SG I'm guessing Bogdanovic (RFA) and Joe Harris would be ahead of Malik on other team's wish lists. Depending on the lottery there is also a chance that NYK/DET/CHO draft a SG. I could also see one or more of those teams using their cap to take on unwanted contracts for assets. I just don't see many potential options for driving up Beasley's price, especially when teams know he's a RFA who the Wolves want to retain.
I'm really curious who people think is going to make a play for Beasley and what that offer might look like.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:wolves_89 wrote:My question on Beasley relates to his market. There are likely only 6 teams with cap space this off-season and of those I see little chance that PHX, MIA, or ATL make him an offer. Of the remaining teams NYK has Barret at SG, DET has Kennard, and CHO is still paying Batum. Even if a team is looking for a SG I'm guessing Bogdanovic (RFA) and Joe Harris would be ahead of Malik on other team's wish lists. Depending on the lottery there is also a chance that NYK/DET/CHO draft a SG. I could also see one or more of those teams using their cap to take on unwanted contracts for assets. I just don't see many potential options for driving up Beasley's price, especially when teams know he's a RFA who the Wolves want to retain.
I'm really curious who people think is going to make a play for Beasley and what that offer might look like.
A lot of people think Atlanta is the team to watch
wolves_89 wrote:My question on Beasley relates to his market. There are likely only 6 teams with cap space this off-season and of those I see little chance that PHX, MIA, or ATL make him an offer. Of the remaining teams NYK has Barret at SG, DET has Kennard, and CHO is still paying Batum. Even if a team is looking for a SG I'm guessing Bogdanovic (RFA) and Joe Harris would be ahead of Malik on other team's wish lists. Depending on the lottery there is also a chance that NYK/DET/CHO draft a SG. I could also see one or more of those teams using their cap to take on unwanted contracts for assets. I just don't see many potential options for driving up Beasley's price, especially when teams know he's a RFA who the Wolves want to retain.
I'm really curious who people think is going to make a play for Beasley and what that offer might look like.
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
wolves_89 wrote:Klomp wrote:wolves_89 wrote:My question on Beasley relates to his market. There are likely only 6 teams with cap space this off-season and of those I see little chance that PHX, MIA, or ATL make him an offer. Of the remaining teams NYK has Barret at SG, DET has Kennard, and CHO is still paying Batum. Even if a team is looking for a SG I'm guessing Bogdanovic (RFA) and Joe Harris would be ahead of Malik on other team's wish lists. Depending on the lottery there is also a chance that NYK/DET/CHO draft a SG. I could also see one or more of those teams using their cap to take on unwanted contracts for assets. I just don't see many potential options for driving up Beasley's price, especially when teams know he's a RFA who the Wolves want to retain.
I'm really curious who people think is going to make a play for Beasley and what that offer might look like.
A lot of people think Atlanta is the team to watch
That would surprise me a bit since they have Huerter, Hunter, and Reddish as young wing options (plus some chance of drafting Edwards/Ball/Hayes depending on how the lottery falls). The Hawks do have a lot of money to spend, so I guess it could make sense to go after the remaining RFA guys (Ingram/Bogdonovic/Beasley) if their current teams try to play hardball in contract negotiations.
wolves_89 wrote:That would surprise me a bit since they have Huerter, Hunter, and Reddish as young wing options (plus some chance of drafting Edwards/Ball/Hayes depending on how the lottery falls). The Hawks do have a lot of money to spend, so I guess it could make sense to go after the remaining RFA guys (Ingram/Bogdonovic/Beasley) if their current teams try to play hardball in contract negotiations.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink wrote:The people I listen to think the best offer will be at the MLE, or maybe slightly a bit more. Remember, DEN offered him 3 for $30 and he turned it down, so he will hope to save face by getting something higher than this. My guess though is still only 3 for $33.
Covid has crushed cap space, and teams may want to hold onto their flexibility for the better 2021 free agent class. Beasley will have some appeal since the teams that have cap space are primarily rebuilding through youth, but because Covid shortened the season, he didn’t get a lot of opportunity to raise other’s opinions of him as a starter.
One last thing I’d mention: Let’s not rule out the chance Beasley will just play one year for the qualifying offer. Most young players who haven’t made much over their career yet will choose a deal that locks in multiple years in case of a career-ending injury, but Beasley already showed last year that he is willing to gamble on himself.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink wrote:One last thing I’d mention: Let’s not rule out the chance Beasley will just play one year for the qualifying offer. Most young players who haven’t made much over their career yet will choose a deal that locks in multiple years in case of a career-ending injury, but Beasley already showed last year that he is willing to gamble on himself.
It could potentially get quite expensive after a year of playing in this system where he's asked to shoot more than maybe prior. When we look at what he's averaged in starting games previously the numbers are up there. If he continued that for a full season of starting on QO, not sure what happens then. Better to sign now if they can.Klomp wrote:I don't want to chance him playing on the qualifying offer.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves