ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Five)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 6,361
And1: 2,197
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#941 » by Neeva » Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:51 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=20

Knicks making good draft and trade moves. Davis is a stud.

Jazz had to pay to unload him, the knicks keep
Being the knicks.
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#942 » by IceManBK1 » Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:53 pm

IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#943 » by IceManBK1 » Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:57 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=20

Randle release looking more refined. Like simmons he'll bring other elements besides the defense. I hope we do sign and trade with Beasley to Knicks.
Heimdal
Sophomore
Posts: 172
And1: 147
Joined: Jun 24, 2015
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#944 » by Heimdal » Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:57 pm

Kaminsky might be the worst defender in the entire league. Believe me.
DaMplsKid
Junior
Posts: 280
And1: 106
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#945 » by DaMplsKid » Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:58 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/basketball/news/frank-kaminsky-team-option-declined-by-suns/

Don't mind Kaminsky as backup big. Can play 4/5


But he can’t defend. This team need some defense in the worst way. With KAT/DLo/Beasley and now Edwards and Rubio our offensive fire power will be fine we need defense and toughness.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 1,020
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#946 » by Dewey » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:00 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/basketball/news/frank-kaminsky-team-option-declined-by-suns/

Don't mind Kaminsky as backup big. Can play 4/5

I’m sure I will be in the minority… But I think he would have a nice fit. Not an elite defender but he can help stretch the floor on the office of end. If the price is right I don’t think it would be a bad grab
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 6,361
And1: 2,197
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#947 » by Neeva » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:01 pm

Icemanbk1 seriously glad you aint the wolves gm.
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,882
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#948 » by urinesane » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:07 pm

What about going after Aron Baynes? Played well with Rubio in PHX

He's like Pek with a 3 point shot :)

KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,335
And1: 4,825
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#949 » by KGdaBom » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:09 pm

urinesane wrote:What about going after Aron Baynes? Played well with Rubio in PHX

He's like Pek with a 3 point shot :)


I think Aaron is a great option. I bet other teams realize it though and we won't be able to afford him.
Shaka_Zulu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,379
And1: 1,706
Joined: Feb 11, 2018
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#950 » by Shaka_Zulu » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:09 pm

Baynes would be perfect for backup Kat role. Thanks for suggesting some sanity uri, I was getting migraine just trying to imagine Kaminsky or Randle in our shirt.
User avatar
_AIJ_
RealGM
Posts: 13,091
And1: 4,164
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#951 » by _AIJ_ » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:10 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:
moonpie wrote:
Read on Twitter
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1329471036614725632%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redditmedia.com%2Fmediaembed%2Fjx75oo%3Fresponsive%3Dtrueis_nightmode%3Dfalse


He's what 6'6? He's gonna get bullied by the talker all star pfs...

Have you actually watched him play?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 8-)
User avatar
_AIJ_
RealGM
Posts: 13,091
And1: 4,164
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#952 » by _AIJ_ » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:11 pm

Neeva wrote:Icemanbk1 seriously glad you aint the wolves gm.

All of his trade ideas are not in favor for the wolves


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 8-)
User avatar
Mattya
RealGM
Posts: 16,605
And1: 6,314
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#953 » by Mattya » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:13 pm

Could we do a sign and trade for Wood using Culver and Spellman and use part of the MLE? Like 4 years 14 million per year for Wood with 8 million outgoing from Culver and Spellman and using the rest of the MLE?
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,882
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#954 » by urinesane » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:14 pm

Used to love PJ Tucker's game, haven't paid much attention to him the past few seasons, he still got it?
Norseman79
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,649
And1: 561
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#955 » by Norseman79 » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:17 pm

Mattya wrote:Could we do a sign and trade for Wood using Culver and Spellman and use part of the MLE? Like 4 years 14 million per year for Wood with 8 million outgoing from Culver and Spellman and using the rest of the MLE?


Or a straight up sign and trade with Beasley. Hard to believe Detroit wouldn't want to keep him though
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 1,020
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#956 » by Dewey » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:17 pm

_AIJ_ wrote:
Neeva wrote:Icemanbk1 seriously glad you aint the wolves gm.

All of his trade ideas are not in favor for the wolves


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Kaminsky on the cheap is light years better than our depth we have right now .... that’s ZERO backup at PF and Reid at center is meh at best ... I’m not saying go get Kaminsky, but to mock the idea considering our current depth is very naive.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Shaka_Zulu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,379
And1: 1,706
Joined: Feb 11, 2018
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#957 » by Shaka_Zulu » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:19 pm

urinesane wrote:Used to love PJ Tucker's game, haven't paid much attention to him the past few seasons, he still got it?



He still got it, he is bit old and wants to get paid (Houston underpaid few years ago to contend, so he wants a raise), so unlikely we will get him, but he is the IDEAL defensive role player. Defends 1-4 very well, and is the best corner 3s shooter around. There is no drawback getting such a perfect utility player and leader.



He is tough as HECK, its ridicolous to think anyone bullies this dude. Just because MDA was misguided enough to use a 6'5 forward as starting center, still held his own and did the job asked of him. As boneheaded as the small ball tasks were.
User avatar
Mattya
RealGM
Posts: 16,605
And1: 6,314
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#958 » by Mattya » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:21 pm

Norseman79 wrote:
Mattya wrote:Could we do a sign and trade for Wood using Culver and Spellman and use part of the MLE? Like 4 years 14 million per year for Wood with 8 million outgoing from Culver and Spellman and using the rest of the MLE?


Or a straight up sign and trade with Beasley. Hard to believe Detroit wouldn't want to keep him though


Pretty sure he is a UFA, so to get a prospect from a team without cap space instead of potentially losing him elsewhere might appeal if they don’t want to pay him.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,335
And1: 4,825
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#959 » by KGdaBom » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:23 pm

Mattya wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:
Mattya wrote:Could we do a sign and trade for Wood using Culver and Spellman and use part of the MLE? Like 4 years 14 million per year for Wood with 8 million outgoing from Culver and Spellman and using the rest of the MLE?


Or a straight up sign and trade with Beasley. Hard to believe Detroit wouldn't want to keep him though


Pretty sure he is a UFA, so to get a prospect from a team without cap space instead of potentially losing him elsewhere might appeal if they don’t want to pay him.

He's an RFA.
User avatar
Mattya
RealGM
Posts: 16,605
And1: 6,314
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#960 » by Mattya » Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:29 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Mattya wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:
Or a straight up sign and trade with Beasley. Hard to believe Detroit wouldn't want to keep him though


Pretty sure he is a UFA, so to get a prospect from a team without cap space instead of potentially losing him elsewhere might appeal if they don’t want to pay him.

He's an RFA.


Where are you seeing this?

On Sportrac he is listed as a UFA.

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents/

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves