Dewey wrote:Are we fools to think Vanderbilt may play a bigger role than expected?
Management has been showing him a lot of love. Maybe he's ready to be a prime time player.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Dewey wrote:Are we fools to think Vanderbilt may play a bigger role than expected?
Baseline81 wrote:Norseman79 wrote:I have a feeling we will be seeing a sign and trade, or just a straight up trade Beasley, Culver, Okoge.. something has to give with Edwards being taken.
If the Wolves retain Beasley, Okogie (and possibly Culver) will need to defend the opposing SF when on the court.
Jedzz wrote:Neeva wrote:Maybe Jaden will surprise us? looking at
Most other teams messageboard everyone wanted him to fall to them late in the first or in the early second round (especially Toronto, Dallas and Charlotte fans)his massive potential is obvious. Then again those same fanbases think the wolves organization won’t bring out the best of Jaden’s potential:/.
If a team can trade up to daft Poku at 17 without being laughed at, McDaniels was good enough for a 17.
Norseman79 wrote:Agreed, but none of those players would I classify as a SF. I would like to see us skip paying Beasley and use the money spent on him to go for a starting SF or PF. A guy like Mo Harkless signed and a PF traded for would help steady things a bit.
Baseline81 wrote:Norseman79 wrote:Agreed, but none of those players would I classify as a SF. I would like to see us skip paying Beasley and use the money spent on him to go for a starting SF or PF. A guy like Mo Harkless signed and a PF traded for would help steady things a bit.
Unlike you, I'd prefer to keep Beasley because of how much his skill set fits with what Rosas and Saunders want. Minnesota needs to surround Rubio, Russell and Towns with shooters.
Ant-man, for better or worse, will be the team's future SG. I just don't see a role for Culver, though he needs to play (and play well) to improve his value. I, too, would target a true SF and PF, whether that's in FA or via trade.
Norseman79 wrote:Could McDaniels or Valentine play the 3 is my question?
Norseman79 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Norseman79 wrote:Agreed, but none of those players would I classify as a SF. I would like to see us skip paying Beasley and use the money spent on him to go for a starting SF or PF. A guy like Mo Harkless signed and a PF traded for would help steady things a bit.
Unlike you, I'd prefer to keep Beasley because of how much his skill set fits with what Rosas and Saunders want. Minnesota needs to surround Rubio, Russell and Towns with shooters.
Ant-man, for better or worse, will be the team's future SG. I just don't see a role for Culver, though he needs to play (and play well) to improve his value. I, too, would target a true SF and PF, whether that's in FA or via trade.
I should have clarified, depending on Beasley's pricetag I would skip. If he is a bargain because of legal issues, then I consider it. I think his ideal role is 6th man, but so is Rubio's at this point.
Russell, Rubio, JMac Haggins
Edwards, Beasley, Culver, Okoge
Layman, Bolmaro
Hernangomez, Valentine, McDaniels
Towns, Reid
Could McDaniels or Valentine play the 3 is my question?
minimus wrote:[youtube][/youtube]Norseman79 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Unlike you, I'd prefer to keep Beasley because of how much his skill set fits with what Rosas and Saunders want. Minnesota needs to surround Rubio, Russell and Towns with shooters.
Ant-man, for better or worse, will be the team's future SG. I just don't see a role for Culver, though he needs to play (and play well) to improve his value. I, too, would target a true SF and PF, whether that's in FA or via trade.
I should have clarified, depending on Beasley's pricetag I would skip. If he is a bargain because of legal issues, then I consider it. I think his ideal role is 6th man, but so is Rubio's at this point.
Russell, Rubio, JMac Haggins
Edwards, Beasley, Culver, Okoge
Layman, Bolmaro
Hernangomez, Valentine, McDaniels
Towns, Reid
Could McDaniels or Valentine play the 3 is my question?
Valentine?
Norseman79 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Norseman79 wrote:Agreed, but none of those players would I classify as a SF. I would like to see us skip paying Beasley and use the money spent on him to go for a starting SF or PF. A guy like Mo Harkless signed and a PF traded for would help steady things a bit.
Unlike you, I'd prefer to keep Beasley because of how much his skill set fits with what Rosas and Saunders want. Minnesota needs to surround Rubio, Russell and Towns with shooters.
Ant-man, for better or worse, will be the team's future SG. I just don't see a role for Culver, though he needs to play (and play well) to improve his value. I, too, would target a true SF and PF, whether that's in FA or via trade.
I should have clarified, depending on Beasley's pricetag I would skip. If he is a bargain because of legal issues, then I consider it. I think his ideal role is 6th man, but so is Rubio's at this point.
Russell, Rubio, JMac Haggins
Edwards, Beasley, Culver, Okoge
Layman, Bolmaro
Hernangomez, Valentine, McDaniels
Towns, Reid
Could McDaniels or Valentine play the 3 is my question?
Neeva wrote:I think Jaden will be the starting PF in a few years and easily the steal of the draft.
KGdaBom wrote:I like the way you think, but I wouldn't count on that.
DaMplsKid wrote:One big we might be able to trade for is Luke Kornet. He was a solid shooter with the Knicks and is getting no playing to in Chicago with all their bigs.
Larry Namce Jr or a Al-Farouq Aminu?
To bad we weren't able to bring back Covington and Rubio. Whats Kevin Loves contract look like
Baseline81 wrote:KGdaBom wrote:I like the way you think, but I wouldn't count on that.
I see thread for Edwards and Bolmoro but not one for McDaniels.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves