Worm Guts wrote:Still, if Philly was looking to trade Simmons I don't think it would be for a rebuilding package. Not when they are this competitive.
Agreed. If we were involved, it would to have to be a three team trade.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Worm Guts wrote:Still, if Philly was looking to trade Simmons I don't think it would be for a rebuilding package. Not when they are this competitive.
jpatrick wrote:MPLS_Wolves wrote:Neeva wrote:Simmons is overated.
.
No he isn't. He is a top 5 defender in the league (arguably top 3) and a terrific fit with the core of this team. He is a clear-cut top 25 guy in the most talented time in NBA History. You pray and hope your top 3 pick becomes as good as Simmons.
The real question is why does Philly trade Simmons for a top 3 pick and table scraps when they are competing for a title? Makes absolutely no sense. They didn't bring in Doc Rivers to trade their 2nd best player and get worse around an MVP candidate in Embiid.
I don’t watch a lot of Philly, but a lot of people think you can’t win in the modern NBA when your best player refuses to shoot outside three feet. Especially when said player is a perimeter guy.
This is especially troublesome when your MVP candidate (Embiid) works best close to the basket. Simmons man essentially becomes a free safety because the defense knows Simmons refuses to shoot. Not that he will just miss but flat out refuses to shoot.
There is also the concerns that he hasn’t improved offensively at all while in the NBA. I think Philly may see what offers are out there if they flame out early in the playoffs. If they make it to the finals, no chance.
That said, would I traded Suggs, Beasley, Rubio, and filler for him? Maybe. Probably actually. But that’s based much more on his defensive profile than what he would do for us offensively.
jpatrick wrote:Worm Guts wrote:Note30 wrote:
Yeah... Boil it down to the one season and the worst supporting class ever.
Ignore the fact that he's single handedly carried every team he's been on.
He's one year removed from the best statistical year he's ever had.
His best year was 16-17, statistically he hasn't been close since. Houston essentially dumped him after 1 season.
Since his MVP year his numbers have dropped:
VORP: 9.3 to 1.9
BPM: 11.1 to 2.2
Win Shares/48: .224 to .042
PER: 30.6 to 18.3
It's really pretty dramatic.
Westbrook is a high floor player. With him, he elevates your floor because he plays as a one man team essentially. However, his style will NEVER be conducive to a highly successful team. Durant couldn't wait to get away from him. And those OKC teams, that was Durant carrying them. Every time Durant (or even Harden for that matter) didn't touch the ball on a possession because Westbrook jacked up a shot, was a possession that wasn't as efficient as it should have been.
There is a reason he was traded for Wall, it was two of the worst contracts in the league being traded for one another.
frankenwolf wrote:I hope you eat every one of these words next year when the Timberwolves are world champions
ChiefKeith91 wrote:BR article proposed a trade for Jerami Grant
Grant for Beasley, Culver, McDaniels and 23 FRP (Top 8 protected)
What do you guys think?
Dlo
Ant
Okogie
Grant
KAT
And our Top 3 pick if we keep it
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
ChiefKeith91 wrote:BR article proposed a trade for Jerami Grant
Grant for Beasley, Culver, McDaniels and 23 FRP (Top 8 protected)
What do you guys think?
Dlo
Ant
Okogie
Grant
KAT
And our Top 3 pick if we keep it
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
ChiefKeith91 wrote:BR article proposed a trade for Jerami Grant
Grant for Beasley, Culver, McDaniels and 23 FRP (Top 8 protected)
What do you guys think?
Dlo
Ant
Okogie
Grant
KAT
And our Top 3 pick if we keep it
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Klomp wrote:IceManBK1 wrote:Dlo for Toppins, quickley and mitch.. Who says no..
I do. That's gross.
Domejandro wrote:Klomp wrote:IceManBK1 wrote:Dlo for Toppins, quickley and mitch.. Who says no..
I do. That's gross.
D'Angelo Russell: $30,013,500 // $31,377,750
vs.
Obi Toppin: $5,105,160 // $5,348,280 // $6,803,012
Immanuel Quickley: $2,210,640 // $2,316,240 // $4,171,548
Mitchell Robinson: $1,802,057 // RFA
Seems like an absolute no-brainer to get out of D'Angelo Russell's contract, especially for three cost-controlled young players.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:Domejandro wrote:Klomp wrote:I do. That's gross.
D'Angelo Russell: $30,013,500 // $31,377,750
vs.
Obi Toppin: $5,105,160 // $5,348,280 // $6,803,012
Immanuel Quickley: $2,210,640 // $2,316,240 // $4,171,548
Mitchell Robinson: $1,802,057 // RFA
Seems like an absolute no-brainer to get out of D'Angelo Russell's contract, especially for three cost-controlled young players.
I don't believe Russell is as negative as a lot of people think. I also don't believe going backwards to accumulate more prospects is the way this franchise should go. We need to be taking steps forward, not backward.
Assuming we keep our pick this year, we need to win as many games as possible next year. Russell gives us a better chance to do that than prospects.
Klomp wrote:Domejandro wrote:Klomp wrote:I do. That's gross.
D'Angelo Russell: $30,013,500 // $31,377,750
vs.
Obi Toppin: $5,105,160 // $5,348,280 // $6,803,012
Immanuel Quickley: $2,210,640 // $2,316,240 // $4,171,548
Mitchell Robinson: $1,802,057 // RFA
Seems like an absolute no-brainer to get out of D'Angelo Russell's contract, especially for three cost-controlled young players.
I don't believe Russell is as negative as a lot of people think. I also don't believe going backwards to accumulate more prospects is the way this franchise should go. We need to be taking steps forward, not backward.
Assuming we keep our pick this year, we need to win as many games as possible next year. Russell gives us a better chance to do that than prospects.
IceManBK1 wrote:You guys think Dlo has reached his ceiling? he'll forever just be a volume shooter with a low fg%. 6th yr into his career and no improvement on rim attacking and finishing ability. defense still leaves alot to be desired. i don't know why the coach don't tell him just focus and stick glued to his man and not leave them open for 3. and he's a lazy rebounder. he's still only 25. but peers his age and drafted around his status are all panning out. Guys like Randle and Ingram have raised their games to another level. IDK, maybe he should work on all areas of his game besides his 3 pters in the summer.
IceManBK1 wrote:You guys think Dlo has reached his ceiling? he'll forever just be a volume shooter with a low fg%. 6th yr into his career and no improvement on rim attacking and finishing ability. defense still leaves alot to be desired. i don't know why the coach don't tell him just focus and stick glued to his man and not leave them open for 3. and he's a lazy rebounder. he's still only 25. but peers his age and drafted around his status are all panning out. Guys like Randle and Ingram have raised their games to another level. IDK, maybe he should work on all areas of his game besides his 3 pters in the summer.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
frankenwolf wrote:I hope you eat every one of these words next year when the Timberwolves are world champions
ChiefKeith91 wrote:BR article proposed a trade for Jerami Grant
Grant for Beasley, Culver, McDaniels and 23 FRP (Top 8 protected)
What do you guys think?
Dlo
Ant
Okogie
Grant
KAT
And our Top 3 pick if we keep it
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Note30 wrote:If we get the #1 pick who'd be down to see us trade it for Jaren Jackson Jr?
Dude's the definition of 3&D, emphasis on the defense.
Brandon Clarke is playing well for them and I think they need another offensive threat outside of Morant.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Krapinsky wrote:Note30 wrote:If we get the #1 pick who'd be down to see us trade it for Jaren Jackson Jr?
Dude's the definition of 3&D, emphasis on the defense.
Brandon Clarke is playing well for them and I think they need another offensive threat outside of Morant.
I see his name come up all the time, but why would Miami trade him? Pair him with Ja and they are in the playoffs for the next decade. Why screw that up?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves