Baseline81 wrote:Jedzz wrote:KAT was supposed to be a great defender. Remember that draft?
Dunn was the automatic BPA and supposedly two way stud.
Edwards was instantly going to improve on his best 31% shooting simply by choosing better shots.
Now Cunningham or Suggs are the answer because...
The draft always cures this team.
Explain the turnarounds in Philadelphia (before Embiid and Simmons) and Dallas (before Doncic).
uh, Philly went all out tanking how many seasons in a row and let everyone know it? They went all in it and ended up with two players. I won't call what they did a success per say. But they afterwards went the extra mile trying to make it work. For years they had horrible roster construction around a unique super athlete/assist machine and net fiend that needs to be on ball to get his best but can't shoot from beyond 6ft out. Then they overpaid some of the largest contracts I've seen at nearly one time to three players trying to make something out of the Duo they drafted. Still didn't get them there yet, had to move some of those guys already. But tell me MN has put this much concerted effort and money into their attempts to tank build. Tell me the Wolves would Max a player (Butler) for a one year stint just to see if that one more piece could get there. They were one shot away because they tried to actually build something around those two pick finds and took a shot. MN never builds and takes shots by adding the vets that can fill the voids. Unless you count Thibs who was run out of town here for it.
Mavericks have only 3 seasons below .500 ball in the past 20 years. Doncic or not they would have climbed out of their mini slump below .500. They are only winning .515 with him now.
Don't bring these horrible examples to my table trying to speak towards some alternative point to my post. My post was about how everyone assumes they know who these college players are before they are drafted and how they will perform at this level and think they can plug them in and that's what they will get. Look at our examples drafted. They aren't what your imaginations said they were. So why do people think their imaginatinos on these next picks will be any different? We could go on and on. Culver was supposed to be this great playmaker that carried his college team. I had endless arguments about this when he was selected. Everyone claimed he would instantly need to start over our crap point guards and save the day. He's about as far from something claimed as I've seen. Between Culver and Dunn people should be calling BPA a three letter swear word. The college game isn't the same. What flies there may not fly here. We just can't know for sure so tossing endless seasons away for your imaginations on some of these future drafted players is just wasteful crazy.