Klomp wrote:This will never be a free agent destination. Develop assets and try to move them off for better pieces that wouldn't normally choose Minnesota in free agency. Russell and Beasley are examples of guys who wouldn't normally choose the Minnesota market if given the option before they were traded here.
And this is exactly why a Non-FA Destination like Minnesota should not carelessly trade lightly protected FRP. High FRP are our most important asset. You simply cannot trade this type of assets for mediocre players (remember that Jaric trade?) or for players that are clearly overpaid and won't move the needle for us.
You simply don't do that unless it is for a game changer. Which DLo is not.
In addition Rosas put the organization in horrible position when DLos contract expires in two years. What are you going to do then? Trade him? Offer him a contract extension for a discount? Hand out another max contract to him because there is fear you might otherwise disgruntle Russell which will have an impact on Towns desire to stay in Minnesota?
I agree that you have to overpay for FAs if you're Minnesota. I also agree that you have to gamble on players that are talented but currently underperforming on their current team or are bench players like Beasley was in Denver.
But what you can easily see is what other non-FA franchises like Atlanta, Denver, Phoenix, Utah, Milwaukee did: They built through the draft until they got a very solid foundation and then traded for/overpaid FA for the missing pieces. Other than Towns we did not have that foundational pieces yet.
So let's find out first what we have in Towns and Edwards and how far they can get us if healthy.
Then you look out for the missing pieces (interior defense, outside shooting etc.) via trade or free agency to round out that roster.
But rounding out the roster and especially overpaying by using our most valuable assets before you have even your foundation set is not the way to do it.