ImageImageImage

The offensive pecking order

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,692
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

The offensive pecking order 

Post#1 » by Klomp » Fri Sep 29, 2023 7:38 pm

There seems to be a lot of discussion about this in multiple threads, so we might as well funnel it to one location.

I think we all know Ant is the top priority. But how will the rest of it look?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,462
And1: 6,044
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#2 » by KGdaBom » Fri Sep 29, 2023 7:42 pm

When you say offensive pecking order do you just mean shots? KAT is obviously 2nd. If you mean involvement in the offense Conley certainly third. If you mean shots McDaniel's and Gobert both might get more shots than Conley.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,692
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#3 » by Klomp » Fri Sep 29, 2023 7:49 pm

KGdaBom wrote:When you say offensive pecking order do you just mean shots? KAT is obviously 2nd. If you mean involvement in the offense Conley certainly third. If you mean shots McDaniel's and Gobert both might get more shots than Conley.

I think that's where the discussion gets interesting, because it can mean. any and all of those things at the same time.

Personally, I see most possessions starting with Ant/KAT two-man action. Jaden will probably be in the corner on the strong side, while Conley and Gobert are on the weak side. Off of Ant/KAT, they either throw it to Jaden in the corner or pass it out to Conley on the weakside to run two-man game with Rudy. That's a pretty well put together offense.

The beauty is, almost anyone off the bench can sub in and you can still run it.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,102
And1: 4,582
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#4 » by wolves_89 » Fri Sep 29, 2023 11:19 pm

My hope is that the offensive scheme is driven by a somewhat equal combination of Ant/KAT where the balance changes game to game depending on the matchup and the opposing team's defensive scheme. For the rest of the roster, I would say it also changes game to game with some subset of Conley, McDaniels, Gobert, Milton, and Naz ending up scoring in the 15-20 range on a given night.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,692
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#5 » by Klomp » Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:38 am

wolves_89 wrote:My hope is that the offensive scheme is driven by a somewhat equal combination of Ant/KAT where the balance changes game to game depending on the matchup and the opposing team's defensive scheme. For the rest of the roster, I would say it also changes game to game with some subset of Conley, McDaniels, Gobert, Milton, and Naz ending up scoring in the 15-20 range on a given night.

Yeah I think it's going to be a very balanced stat sheet overall. Towns and Ant over 20, but then a handful of guys that likely can wind up around 10-20 ppg. That's seven guys of the nine-man rotation and you're at a bare minimum of 90 points from them most nights. That's a pretty good starting point.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Mamba4Goat
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 11,767
And1: 8,071
Joined: Dec 13, 2013
     

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#6 » by Mamba4Goat » Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:59 am

The pecking order is going to be pretty interesting and could be broken into tiers…

Top options:
1. Ant
2. KAT

Top bench options
1. Naz
2. Shake

Those four likely have set roles of just getting theirs. Conley, McDaniels, and to a lesser extent Gobert is where this gets really intriguing. They could just organically get their points throughout the game or have a need for Conley to score more, find a way to enable Jaden more, or, and hopefully not, try to get Gobert involved as much as possible (unless he’s hitting 3s. That’s welcome).

Edit: I’d imagine this is solved as the season goes on with no real set in stone hierarchy amongst those three.

NAW and SloMo will likely be more of a pair of glue guys than scorers factored into any pecking order and will organically get somewhere between 6-12 ppg every night.

Ideally I’d go Ant, KAT, Jaden, Naz, Shake, Conley, Rudy, NAW, SloMo in terms of FGA per game.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
User avatar
m2002brian
Analyst
Posts: 3,300
And1: 1,361
Joined: May 29, 2009
     

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#7 » by m2002brian » Sat Sep 30, 2023 4:03 am

This team should. Be close the the OKC team that made the finals BUT hopefully we can find a third guy (like they had harden). Jaden should be a more or a reliable offensive AND MORE accurately, a defensive option than harden was for okc. And the cherry on top is Mike mother clucking Conley Jr with is cream just below him Rudy Gobert.

This is a deep team with deep talen. It’s more a matter of being a cohesive unit than it is a matter of talent. We should be witness to some greatness this year if the chemistry is in our favor.
BLUEGREENRED
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,231
And1: 17,152
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#8 » by Calinks » Sat Sep 30, 2023 9:37 am

Ant needs to be the number one option if we want success but he has to prove he is able to handle it for 82 games. He can't vanish for huge stretches. We need to try to make him the number 1 option, we need him to be the number 1 option, but until he proves otherwise and consistently shows it, I still think Towns will be the number 1 option. He has a proven track record of producing every season, Ant hasn't managed that yet, that's part of being a superstar.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,462
And1: 6,044
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#9 » by KGdaBom » Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:40 pm

Calinks wrote:Ant needs to be the number one option if we want success but he has to prove he is able to handle it for 82 games. He can't vanish for huge stretches. We need to try to make him the number 1 option, we need him to be the number 1 option, but until he proves otherwise and consistently shows it, I still think Towns will be the number 1 option. He has a proven track record of producing every season, Ant hasn't managed that yet, that's part of being a superstar.

KAT barely scored 20 PPG last season. He needs to return to 25 with 40% 3s.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,081
And1: 17,121
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#10 » by Jamaaliver » Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:30 pm

Read on Twitter
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,154
And1: 1,883
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#11 » by Note30 » Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:34 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Calinks wrote:Ant needs to be the number one option if we want success but he has to prove he is able to handle it for 82 games. He can't vanish for huge stretches. We need to try to make him the number 1 option, we need him to be the number 1 option, but until he proves otherwise and consistently shows it, I still think Towns will be the number 1 option. He has a proven track record of producing every season, Ant hasn't managed that yet, that's part of being a superstar.

KAT barely scored 20 PPG last season. He needs to return to 25 with 40% 3s.


He also played 29 games and was still getting back into for 8 games, of course he's going to score more this season.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,692
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#12 » by Klomp » Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:38 pm

Note30 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Calinks wrote:Ant needs to be the number one option if we want success but he has to prove he is able to handle it for 82 games. He can't vanish for huge stretches. We need to try to make him the number 1 option, we need him to be the number 1 option, but until he proves otherwise and consistently shows it, I still think Towns will be the number 1 option. He has a proven track record of producing every season, Ant hasn't managed that yet, that's part of being a superstar.

KAT barely scored 20 PPG last season. He needs to return to 25 with 40% 3s.


He also played 29 games and was still getting back into for 8 games, of course he's going to score more this season.

Last year was an off year, I think that's clear to anyone who doesn't have an agenda. I think it's foolish to say none of that had to do with injury/illness and attribute it solely to the position change and playing with Gobert.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,102
And1: 4,582
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#13 » by wolves_89 » Sat Sep 30, 2023 6:08 pm

Klomp wrote:
Note30 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:KAT barely scored 20 PPG last season. He needs to return to 25 with 40% 3s.


He also played 29 games and was still getting back into for 8 games, of course he's going to score more this season.

Last year was an off year, I think that's clear to anyone who doesn't have an agenda. I think it's foolish to say none of that had to do with injury/illness and attribute it solely to the position change and playing with Gobert.


I'd also add that even in the 29 games KAT played the majority of those were at far less than 100%. At the start of the regular season KAT was coming off being hospitalized and effectively missing training camp. I would have expected it to take at least 3-4 weeks for him to get in shape and find a rhythm (he got hurt at around 5 weeks). At the end of the season, it was pretty clear that he was not fully recovered.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,462
And1: 6,044
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#14 » by KGdaBom » Sun Oct 1, 2023 4:06 am

Note30 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Calinks wrote:Ant needs to be the number one option if we want success but he has to prove he is able to handle it for 82 games. He can't vanish for huge stretches. We need to try to make him the number 1 option, we need him to be the number 1 option, but until he proves otherwise and consistently shows it, I still think Towns will be the number 1 option. He has a proven track record of producing every season, Ant hasn't managed that yet, that's part of being a superstar.

KAT barely scored 20 PPG last season. He needs to return to 25 with 40% 3s.


He also played 29 games and was still getting back into for 8 games, of course he's going to score more this season.

Just pointing it out and hoping/expecting better this year. Another reason we will be a massively improved team that will finish top 3 in the west. :D
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,462
And1: 6,044
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#15 » by KGdaBom » Sun Oct 1, 2023 4:07 am

Klomp wrote:
Note30 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:KAT barely scored 20 PPG last season. He needs to return to 25 with 40% 3s.


He also played 29 games and was still getting back into for 8 games, of course he's going to score more this season.

Last year was an off year, I think that's clear to anyone who doesn't have an agenda. I think it's foolish to say none of that had to do with injury/illness and attribute it solely to the position change and playing with Gobert.

I just pointed out a fact. I'm hoping for and expecting much better this year.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,739
And1: 2,566
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#16 » by younggunsmn » Sun Oct 1, 2023 9:07 am

I think how Shake Milton fits into the mix is the one big unknown right now.
If he can replace the Nowell/Jmac minutes with some high efficiency bench play, that's a big upgrade.
But he has to be a passer too and developing some chemistry with Naz could give us a pretty lethal bench unit.
The film i've seen of him in Philly seems to indicate he's more of a crafty scorer and doesn't wow you with his athleticism, handle, or natural shooting ability.

I expect Slo-Mo's usage to dip quite a bit next year if KAT can stay healthy.
KAT was also not his previously hyper-efficient self.
Was that an indication of the poor spacing/forced shots with Gobert or of a decline related to the series of injuries he has had?

The sets Finch chooses to run will somewhat dictate the pecking order.
I expect more sets for Ant and a bigger variety of playcalls in the halfcourt with a better floor general in Conley for a full season.

If its just a bunch of Gobert pick and roll variations again, Ant ISO step backs, and KAT posting up at the 3 point line, we are in real trouble.
User avatar
andyhop
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 1,318
Joined: May 08, 2007
   

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#17 » by andyhop » Sun Oct 1, 2023 11:01 am

Ideally KAT would be the first option with Ant as the second option given how much more efficient KAT is.
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,692
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#18 » by Klomp » Sun Oct 1, 2023 5:43 pm

younggunsmn wrote:I think how Shake Milton fits into the mix is the one big unknown right now.
If he can replace the Nowell/Jmac minutes with some high efficiency bench play, that's a big upgrade.
But he has to be a passer too and developing some chemistry with Naz could give us a pretty lethal bench unit.
The film i've seen of him in Philly seems to indicate he's more of a crafty scorer and doesn't wow you with his athleticism, handle, or natural shooting ability.

I expect Slo-Mo's usage to dip quite a bit next year if KAT can stay healthy.
KAT was also not his previously hyper-efficient self.
Was that an indication of the poor spacing/forced shots with Gobert or of a decline related to the series of injuries he has had?

The sets Finch chooses to run will somewhat dictate the pecking order.
I expect more sets for Ant and a bigger variety of playcalls in the halfcourt with a better floor general in Conley for a full season.

If its just a bunch of Gobert pick and roll variations again, Ant ISO step backs, and KAT posting up at the 3 point line, we are in real trouble.

I wrote in post three of this thread how I personally see the pecking order of the starting group.

Personally, I see most possessions starting with Ant/KAT two-man action. Jaden will probably be in the corner on the strong side, while Conley and Gobert are on the weak side. Off of Ant/KAT, they either throw it to Jaden in the corner or pass it out to Conley on the weakside to run two-man game with Rudy. That's a pretty well put together offense.

The beauty is, almost anyone off the bench can sub in and you can still run it.


Now let's expound on that last sentence.

Naz: Can fill in at Gobert or Towns' spot.
Anderson: Could step in for any one of the five.
Alexander-Walker: Could step in for Edwards, Conley or McDaniels
Milton: Could step in for Edwards, Conley or McDaniels
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,973
And1: 3,005
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#19 » by TimberKat » Sun Oct 1, 2023 6:33 pm

younggunsmn wrote:I think how Shake Milton fits into the mix is the one big unknown right now.
If he can replace the Nowell/Jmac minutes with some high efficiency bench play, that's a big upgrade.
But he has to be a passer too and developing some chemistry with Naz could give us a pretty lethal bench unit.
The film i've seen of him in Philly seems to indicate he's more of a crafty scorer and doesn't wow you with his athleticism, handle, or natural shooting ability.

I feel the same that he is more a Nowell replacement, but Connelly mentioned they see him as PG. Also, Finch mentioned he should be great in running pick and roll with Gobert (which I can see why from film). If I assume everyone just be as good as last year. Milton is the biggest unknown as we expecting him to do a lot more (or more minutes) than what he did in Philly.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,692
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The offensive pecking order 

Post#20 » by Klomp » Sun Oct 1, 2023 6:48 pm

TimberKat wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:I think how Shake Milton fits into the mix is the one big unknown right now.
If he can replace the Nowell/Jmac minutes with some high efficiency bench play, that's a big upgrade.
But he has to be a passer too and developing some chemistry with Naz could give us a pretty lethal bench unit.
The film i've seen of him in Philly seems to indicate he's more of a crafty scorer and doesn't wow you with his athleticism, handle, or natural shooting ability.

I feel the same that he is more a Nowell replacement, but Connelly mentioned they see him as PG. Also, Finch mentioned he should be great in running pick and roll with Gobert (which I can see why from film). If I assume everyone just be as good as last year. Milton is the biggest unknown as we expecting him to do a lot more (or more minutes) than what he did in Philly.

Don't forget that Naz is a heavy pick-and-roll big too. I expect that combo to thrive leading the second unit.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves