2025 Free Agency
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
2025 Free Agency
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,565
- And1: 5,068
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
2025 Free Agency
Our FAs:
Randle
Naz Reid
NAW
Clark
Notable FAs:
Malcolm Brogdon
Larry Nance Jr.
Tre Jones
Ziaire Williams
Tyus Jones
Isaiah Jackson
Day'Ron Sharpe
Santi Aldama
James Wiseman
Cam Reddish
Guerschon Yabusele
Jericho Sims
Paul Reed
Randle
Naz Reid
NAW
Clark
Notable FAs:
Malcolm Brogdon
Larry Nance Jr.
Tre Jones
Ziaire Williams
Tyus Jones
Isaiah Jackson
Day'Ron Sharpe
Santi Aldama
James Wiseman
Cam Reddish
Guerschon Yabusele
Jericho Sims
Paul Reed
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,640
- And1: 22,207
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: [emoji2390]0[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji[emoji2390]391]] Free Agency
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,565
- And1: 5,068
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: [emoji2390]0[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji[emoji2390]391]] Free Agency
Is there any reason why Randle would prefer sign-and-trade instead of simply declining his PO option and signing with another team?
Re: [emoji2390]0[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji[emoji2390]391]] Free Agency
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,545
- And1: 3,231
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: [emoji2390]0[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji[emoji2390]391]] Free Agency
minimus wrote:Is there any reason why Randle would prefer sign-and-trade instead of simply declining his PO option and signing with another team?
What teams will have the cap space to outright sign him?
Re: [emoji2390]0[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji[emoji2390]391]] Free Agency
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,640
- And1: 22,207
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: [emoji2390]0[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji[emoji2390]391]] Free Agency
BlacJacMac wrote:minimus wrote:Is there any reason why Randle would prefer sign-and-trade instead of simply declining his PO option and signing with another team?
What teams will have the cap space to outright sign him?
Yeah I think that explains the reason. It would be to get to a specific team, and determining what mechanic gets it done the easiest.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,035
- And1: 5,681
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: 2025 Free Agency
Just saw on hoopshype that Bones Hyland is getting waived. I personally don’t want him, but I know some of you did/do. If we were to try and add multiple players (convert Clark, sign a backup big, and get Hyland,) that would involve waiving Jingles and Garza and then signing Hyland and big while using spot 15 on the conversion. Depending on who wins and how willing they are to burn money I put the chances between 0 and 1/10 of 1%.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,428
- And1: 664
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
- Location: Roma
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
Seems Bones Hyland is free...TC has a link with him (DEN). What about him??
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,428
- And1: 2,849
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: 2025 Free Agency
No thanks wolves barely have playing time for the rookie guards. Wolves need a center that is better than Garza instead.
Re: [emoji2390]0[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji[emoji2390]391]] Free Agency
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,565
- And1: 5,068
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: [emoji2390]0[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji[emoji2390]391]] Free Agency
Bones Hyland is basically Rob Dillingham which development went in wrong direction.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,545
- And1: 3,231
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
TwolvesFanRome wrote:Seems Bones Hyland is free...TC has a link with him (DEN). What about him??
That's my big fear.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,102
- And1: 4,582
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
TwolvesFanRome wrote:Seems Bones Hyland is free...TC has a link with him (DEN). What about him??
I think I'd rather move Clark to a regular contract.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,545
- And1: 3,231
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
wolves_89 wrote:TwolvesFanRome wrote:Seems Bones Hyland is free...TC has a link with him (DEN). What about him??
I think I'd rather move Clark to a regular contract.
It’s not even close. Clark is already a much better player than Bones.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,035
- And1: 5,681
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: 2025 Free Agency
BlacJacMac wrote:wolves_89 wrote:TwolvesFanRome wrote:Seems Bones Hyland is free...TC has a link with him (DEN). What about him??
I think I'd rather move Clark to a regular contract.
It’s not even close. Clark is already a much better player than Bones.
3 things.
1. It is not one or the other. If we had serious designs on Bones we could sign him, waive Jingles, and convert Clark.
2. IMO the Wolves team Hyland is best suited for is the Iowa Wolves. His defense is substandard, his offense is inconsistent, and his attitude is questionable. I don’t think he has NBA upside, and even if he does I don’t think he is gonna develop it in the NBA. It will develop in the G, in Europe, or in Asia.
3. This is his fourth year, which means he is still two way eligible. If we convert Clark, then we could sign Hyland to a two way and give him a test run. That said it would likely come at the expense of Dilly getting minutes.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,545
- And1: 3,231
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
winforlose wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:wolves_89 wrote:
I think I'd rather move Clark to a regular contract.
It’s not even close. Clark is already a much better player than Bones.
3 things.
1. It is not one or the other. If we had serious designs on Bones we could sign him, waive Jingles, and convert Clark.
2. IMO the Wolves team Hyland is best suited for is the Iowa Wolves. His defense is substandard, his offense is inconsistent, and his attitude is questionable. I don’t think he has NBA upside, and even if he does I don’t think he is gonna develop it in the NBA. It will develop in the G, in Europe, or in Asia.
3. This is his fourth year, which means he is still two way eligible. If we convert Clark, then we could sign Hyland to a two way and give him a test run. That said it would likely come at the expense of Dilly getting minutes.
Obviously we can do both. But I don't see the upside. We'd be adding a guy who apparently our GM is a big fan of at our most stacked position. If he gets any minutes, its at the expense of a better option.
And I doubt he's signing here to be a 2-way or G League player. Some team will likely give him a chance to prove himself on a roster.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,035
- And1: 5,681
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: 2025 Free Agency
BlacJacMac wrote:winforlose wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:
It’s not even close. Clark is already a much better player than Bones.
3 things.
1. It is not one or the other. If we had serious designs on Bones we could sign him, waive Jingles, and convert Clark.
2. IMO the Wolves team Hyland is best suited for is the Iowa Wolves. His defense is substandard, his offense is inconsistent, and his attitude is questionable. I don’t think he has NBA upside, and even if he does I don’t think he is gonna develop it in the NBA. It will develop in the G, in Europe, or in Asia.
3. This is his fourth year, which means he is still two way eligible. If we convert Clark, then we could sign Hyland to a two way and give him a test run. That said it would likely come at the expense of Dilly getting minutes.
Obviously we can do both. But I don't see the upside. We'd be adding a guy who apparently our GM is a big fan of at our most stacked position. If he gets any minutes, its at the expense of a better option.
And I doubt he's signing here to be a 2-way or G League player. Some team will likely give him a chance to prove himself on a roster.
He had two and failed. He is not two way eligible after this year, and teams were trading to cut cost. The most likely result is a two way.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,545
- And1: 3,231
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
winforlose wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:winforlose wrote:
3 things.
1. It is not one or the other. If we had serious designs on Bones we could sign him, waive Jingles, and convert Clark.
2. IMO the Wolves team Hyland is best suited for is the Iowa Wolves. His defense is substandard, his offense is inconsistent, and his attitude is questionable. I don’t think he has NBA upside, and even if he does I don’t think he is gonna develop it in the NBA. It will develop in the G, in Europe, or in Asia.
3. This is his fourth year, which means he is still two way eligible. If we convert Clark, then we could sign Hyland to a two way and give him a test run. That said it would likely come at the expense of Dilly getting minutes.
Obviously we can do both. But I don't see the upside. We'd be adding a guy who apparently our GM is a big fan of at our most stacked position. If he gets any minutes, its at the expense of a better option.
And I doubt he's signing here to be a 2-way or G League player. Some team will likely give him a chance to prove himself on a roster.
He had two and failed. He is not two way eligible after this year, and teams were trading to cut cost. The most likely result is a two way.
Yes, he failed on 2 playoff teams. I'd imagine a lottery level team will be happy to take a chance on him for the minimum.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,565
- And1: 5,068
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
It will be interesting to see whole timeline when decision have to be made this summer.
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,275
- And1: 19,283
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: 2025 Free Agency
I never thought I’d say it, but if we weren’t over the second apron, Ben Simmons might have helped as a back up center who can playmake. Yikes!
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,545
- And1: 3,231
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
shrink wrote:I never thought I’d say it, but if we weren’t over the second apron, Ben Simmons might have helped as a back up center who can playmake. Yikes!
Over the first apron!
Re: 2025 Free Agency
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,545
- And1: 3,231
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: 2025 Free Agency
If Chris Paul gets bought out, do we take a run at him?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves