ImageImageImage

Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,035
And1: 5,681
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#1 » by winforlose » Fri Feb 28, 2025 6:58 pm

We know Rudy and Randle are out. We know as of now Ant is suspended due to technical fouls. We know DDV has one game back on a minutes restriction, and we know Mike played only 14 minutes on the last back to back. We also have reason to suspect Jesse Edwards is out with an ankle injury.

If you pretend that Jaden had to miss a game, the starting lineup could easily be Mike/DDV/Ant/Randle/Rudy. If all 5 miss tonight’s game, that is literally a viable starting 5 that will be out. Instead we likely start Dilly/TSJ/Clark/MCD/Naz. Our bench depth is Hyland/NAW/Minott/Miller/Garza and maybe Jingles somewhere in that mix. This is a winnable game, but on the back end of a road/road B2B, I have concerns.
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,969
And1: 2,999
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#2 » by TimberKat » Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:27 pm

winforlose wrote:We know Rudy and Randle are out. We know as of now Ant is suspended due to technical fouls. We know DDV has one game back on a minutes restriction, and we know Mike played only 14 minutes on the last back to back. We also have reason to suspect Jesse Edwards is out with an ankle injury.

If you pretend that Jaden had to miss a game, the starting lineup could easily be Mike/DDV/Ant/Randle/Rudy. If all 5 miss tonight’s game, that is literally a viable starting 5 that will be out. Instead we likely start Dilly/TSJ/Clark/MCD/Naz. Our bench depth is Hyland/NAW/Minott/Miller/Garza and maybe Jingles somewhere in that mix. This is a winnable game, but on the back end of a road/road B2B, I have concerns.

Are you saying we won't get fall behind 20 pts first then try to mount a combat?
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,035
And1: 5,681
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#3 » by winforlose » Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:51 pm

TimberKat wrote:
winforlose wrote:We know Rudy and Randle are out. We know as of now Ant is suspended due to technical fouls. We know DDV has one game back on a minutes restriction, and we know Mike played only 14 minutes on the last back to back. We also have reason to suspect Jesse Edwards is out with an ankle injury.

If you pretend that Jaden had to miss a game, the starting lineup could easily be Mike/DDV/Ant/Randle/Rudy. If all 5 miss tonight’s game, that is literally a viable starting 5 that will be out. Instead we likely start Dilly/TSJ/Clark/MCD/Naz. Our bench depth is Hyland/NAW/Minott/Miller/Garza and maybe Jingles somewhere in that mix. This is a winnable game, but on the back end of a road/road B2B, I have concerns.

Are you saying we won't get fall behind 20 pts first then try to mount a combat?


I am saying we are missing a ton of talent. I am saying I doubt DDV plays back to back on his 2nd game back, and that Mike probably doesn’t play. If Mike does play it is probably for about 15 minutes. When you are down 5 of your top 8, and 3 of your 4 best offensive players, it puts you in a tricky spot. Especially with tired legs in a back to back.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,546
And1: 3,235
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#4 » by BlacJacMac » Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:55 pm

winforlose wrote:
TimberKat wrote:
winforlose wrote:We know Rudy and Randle are out. We know as of now Ant is suspended due to technical fouls. We know DDV has one game back on a minutes restriction, and we know Mike played only 14 minutes on the last back to back. We also have reason to suspect Jesse Edwards is out with an ankle injury.

If you pretend that Jaden had to miss a game, the starting lineup could easily be Mike/DDV/Ant/Randle/Rudy. If all 5 miss tonight’s game, that is literally a viable starting 5 that will be out. Instead we likely start Dilly/TSJ/Clark/MCD/Naz. Our bench depth is Hyland/NAW/Minott/Miller/Garza and maybe Jingles somewhere in that mix. This is a winnable game, but on the back end of a road/road B2B, I have concerns.

Are you saying we won't get fall behind 20 pts first then try to mount a combat?


I am saying we are missing a ton of talent. I am saying I doubt DDV plays back to back on his 2nd game back, and that Mike probably doesn’t play. If Mike does play it is probably for about 15 minutes. When you are down 5 of your top 8, and 3 of your 4 best offensive players, it puts you in a tricky spot. Especially with tired legs in a back to back.


Finch, in his postgame, said DDV would play tonight on a "minutes restriction".

DDV talk starts at the 4 minute mark:

;ab_channel=MinnesotaTimberwolves
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,035
And1: 5,681
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#5 » by winforlose » Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:04 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:
TimberKat wrote:Are you saying we won't get fall behind 20 pts first then try to mount a combat?


I am saying we are missing a ton of talent. I am saying I doubt DDV plays back to back on his 2nd game back, and that Mike probably doesn’t play. If Mike does play it is probably for about 15 minutes. When you are down 5 of your top 8, and 3 of your 4 best offensive players, it puts you in a tricky spot. Especially with tired legs in a back to back.


Finch, in his postgame, said DDV would play tonight on a "minutes restriction".

DDV talk starts at the 4 minute mark:

;ab_channel=MinnesotaTimberwolves


That’s good info, thank you. I cannot say I love the decision, but without the other guys I get it. I still worry we might drop a very winnable game, but hopefully that does not happen.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,546
And1: 3,235
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#6 » by BlacJacMac » Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:11 pm

winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:
I am saying we are missing a ton of talent. I am saying I doubt DDV plays back to back on his 2nd game back, and that Mike probably doesn’t play. If Mike does play it is probably for about 15 minutes. When you are down 5 of your top 8, and 3 of your 4 best offensive players, it puts you in a tricky spot. Especially with tired legs in a back to back.


Finch, in his postgame, said DDV would play tonight on a "minutes restriction".

DDV talk starts at the 4 minute mark:

;ab_channel=MinnesotaTimberwolves


That’s good info, thank you. I cannot say I love the decision, but without the other guys I get it. I still worry we might drop a very winnable game, but hopefully that does not happen.


If he's healthy enough to play I love it. It should be a decision based on conditioning, so a 20-25 MPG (or whatever) limit makes sense for a stretch.

If you're worried he's going to get hurt again, he shouldn't be playing yet in the first place.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,035
And1: 5,681
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#7 » by winforlose » Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:20 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
Finch, in his postgame, said DDV would play tonight on a "minutes restriction".

DDV talk starts at the 4 minute mark:

;ab_channel=MinnesotaTimberwolves


That’s good info, thank you. I cannot say I love the decision, but without the other guys I get it. I still worry we might drop a very winnable game, but hopefully that does not happen.


If he's healthy enough to play I love it. It should be a decision based on conditioning, so a 20-25 MPG (or whatever) limit makes sense for a stretch.

If you're worried he's going to get hurt again, he shouldn't be playing yet in the first place.


Most teams don’t run a guy back to back until he has played a few games. The theory being his body is more vulnerable to injury (muscles more tight, recovery process not fully complete, ect…) I am not as worried about his toe as his legs getting injured. But I know they higher trainers and medical staff to look out for the guys, and end of the day we gotta trust that.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,546
And1: 3,235
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#8 » by BlacJacMac » Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:23 pm

winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:
That’s good info, thank you. I cannot say I love the decision, but without the other guys I get it. I still worry we might drop a very winnable game, but hopefully that does not happen.


If he's healthy enough to play I love it. It should be a decision based on conditioning, so a 20-25 MPG (or whatever) limit makes sense for a stretch.

If you're worried he's going to get hurt again, he shouldn't be playing yet in the first place.


Most teams don’t run a guy back to back until he has played a few games. The theory being his body is more vulnerable to injury (muscles more tight, recovery process not fully complete, ect…) I am not as worried about his toe as his legs getting injured. But I know they higher trainers and medical staff to look out for the guys, and end of the day we gotta trust that.


I think that's a newer thing. And more for guys with chronic or frequent injuries. I feel like it really started with Embiid - and Zion has run with that baton.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,035
And1: 5,681
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#9 » by winforlose » Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:31 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
If he's healthy enough to play I love it. It should be a decision based on conditioning, so a 20-25 MPG (or whatever) limit makes sense for a stretch.

If you're worried he's going to get hurt again, he shouldn't be playing yet in the first place.


Most teams don’t run a guy back to back until he has played a few games. The theory being his body is more vulnerable to injury (muscles more tight, recovery process not fully complete, ect…) I am not as worried about his toe as his legs getting injured. But I know they higher trainers and medical staff to look out for the guys, and end of the day we gotta trust that.


I think that's a newer thing. And more for guys with chronic or frequent injuries. I feel like it really started with Embiid - and Zion has run with that baton.


You may be right. I don’t know enough about sports medicine to speak intelligently about what is or is not best for Donte. I assumed we might ease him in more, but clearly that is not the case.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,276
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#10 » by shrink » Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:54 pm

Utah has been the most aggressive tanker this year, actively sitting talent one night who seem completely fine.

Missing Ant, Rudy and Randle is a lot, but it’s quite possible we will still have more talent on the floor than the Jazz.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,546
And1: 3,235
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#11 » by BlacJacMac » Fri Feb 28, 2025 10:27 pm

shrink wrote:Utah has been the most aggressive tanker this year, actively sitting talent one night who seem completely fine.

Missing Ant, Rudy and Randle is a lot, but it’s quite possible we will still have more talent on the floor than the Jazz.


Although we're the one team they have incentive to beat.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,363
And1: 642
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#12 » by Loaf_of_bread » Fri Feb 28, 2025 11:29 pm

Have Garza watch the movie "rudy", give him a motivational speech, give him free reign to make as many shots as possible. Easy win.
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,764
And1: 1,325
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#13 » by TheZachAttack » Fri Feb 28, 2025 11:49 pm

I'm hoping Shannon gets the start. I'd love to see Conley-Clarke-Shannon-Jaden-Naz.
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,906
And1: 1,104
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#14 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Sat Mar 1, 2025 1:29 am

People absent or not, B2B, we have to win this one. Period.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,363
And1: 642
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#15 » by Loaf_of_bread » Sat Mar 1, 2025 1:31 am

Betting line down to wolves -4. I guess I am just an idiot fan.. biased. Bettors are usually right, and we are 26-32 against spread on the year. We suck.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,640
And1: 22,210
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#16 » by Klomp » Sat Mar 1, 2025 2:28 am

How much run does Joe get tonight?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,231
And1: 17,152
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#17 » by Calinks » Sat Mar 1, 2025 2:42 am

This game will be awesome. The TSJ game!
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Folklore
Pro Prospect
Posts: 851
And1: 250
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
 

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#18 » by Folklore » Sat Mar 1, 2025 2:57 am

How many times is Finch going to call a TO at the worst moment just for the other team to challenge?
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,969
And1: 2,999
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#19 » by TimberKat » Sat Mar 1, 2025 3:06 am

Wondering what is the latest stat on defense with and without Gobert. 38 to Jazz without a couple key players is not good
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,969
And1: 2,999
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Game 61: Wolves (32-28) @ Jazz (14-44) 

Post#20 » by TimberKat » Sat Mar 1, 2025 3:16 am

What is going on with Dilly's 3 pt shooting? He was great the first month and now can't hit the broad side of a barn (so to speak in Minnesota terms)???

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves