Value of upcoming MN FA
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 808
- And1: 295
- Joined: Jan 06, 2022
Value of upcoming MN FA
Not sure if putting this in one thread helps or not. Wanting to discuss our FA to be and:
1) If they raised their value after regular season
2) What they are doing to their value in playoffs
3) predictions in offseason
Julius Randle: I'd say ^ and ^
prediction: we either sign and trade him or he declines option and signs elsewhere. Pipedream is Randle + Rudy + RD for KD in a 3 team trade.
NAW: regular season up, postseason down
prediction: 3 year deal with MN
NAZ: Up-down
prediction: this one hurts, but someone else pays him what we cannot. If we trade Rudy, we keep Naz.
Ingles: gone
Garza/Minott: options picked up
1) If they raised their value after regular season
2) What they are doing to their value in playoffs
3) predictions in offseason
Julius Randle: I'd say ^ and ^
prediction: we either sign and trade him or he declines option and signs elsewhere. Pipedream is Randle + Rudy + RD for KD in a 3 team trade.
NAW: regular season up, postseason down
prediction: 3 year deal with MN
NAZ: Up-down
prediction: this one hurts, but someone else pays him what we cannot. If we trade Rudy, we keep Naz.
Ingles: gone
Garza/Minott: options picked up
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,833
- And1: 2,911
- Joined: Jul 02, 2022
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
cmoss84 wrote:Not sure if putting this in one thread helps or not. Wanting to discuss our FA to be and:
1) If they raised their value after regular season
2) What they are doing to their value in playoffs
3) predictions in offseason
Julius Randle: I'd say ^ and ^
prediction: we either sign and trade him or he declines option and signs elsewhere. Pipedream is Randle + Rudy + RD for KD in a 3 team trade.
NAW: regular season up, postseason down
prediction: 3 year deal with MN
NAZ: Up-down
prediction: this one hurts, but someone else pays him what we cannot. If we trade Rudy, we keep Naz.
Ingles: gone
Garza/Minott: options picked up
Naz is at where he should be, maybe 2 MIL more tops. Tell me he is worth 20M after last night's performance. It is not like that is the only bad night. He has 30 to 40 percent bad nights.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,247
- And1: 2,943
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
Randle has probably raised his value enough to be a borderline bad contract on his next deal.
I think NAW's continued inability to shoot in the playoffs has tanked his value.
I love Naz, but is he worth more than an Obi Toppin or Bobby Portis?
I think NAW's continued inability to shoot in the playoffs has tanked his value.
I love Naz, but is he worth more than an Obi Toppin or Bobby Portis?
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,018
- And1: 21,717
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
TimberKat wrote:cmoss84 wrote:Not sure if putting this in one thread helps or not. Wanting to discuss our FA to be and:
1) If they raised their value after regular season
2) What they are doing to their value in playoffs
3) predictions in offseason
Julius Randle: I'd say ^ and ^
prediction: we either sign and trade him or he declines option and signs elsewhere. Pipedream is Randle + Rudy + RD for KD in a 3 team trade.
NAW: regular season up, postseason down
prediction: 3 year deal with MN
NAZ: Up-down
prediction: this one hurts, but someone else pays him what we cannot. If we trade Rudy, we keep Naz.
Ingles: gone
Garza/Minott: options picked up
Naz is at where he should be, maybe 2 MIL more tops. Tell me he is worth 20M after last night's performance. It is not like that is the only bad night. He has 30 to 40 percent bad nights.
Part of that I think has to do with roster breakdown though. On this team, he has to be more of an "instant offense" guy off the bench because we are so deep, or it's going to probably be a bad night. For many other teams, there will be a greater runway for him to snap out of a funk because he would likely have a larger role to go along with that higher salary.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,639
- And1: 1,875
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
I would expect Naz to get in the 20-25m/year range with NAW getting, at least the full MLE, which would be 4 years at 60m. Both are worth those contracts, but we can’t pay both with our salary structure. My guess is Naz gets the money and not NAW.
Randle is worth 30m. Would I give him 3yrs at 30 per? yes. He probably could easily get 3 years for 100m on the open market. I just don’t know if that’s a good deal for us. I don’t see him as a #2 on a championship team.
Randle is worth 30m. Would I give him 3yrs at 30 per? yes. He probably could easily get 3 years for 100m on the open market. I just don’t know if that’s a good deal for us. I don’t see him as a #2 on a championship team.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,481
- And1: 2,371
- Joined: May 28, 2007
- Location: Hiding from the thought police.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
There is only going to be like one team with any serious cap room (Brooklyn).
Horrible year for anyone looking for a deal above the MLE.
Randle isn't getting 30 per in the market this summer and will opt in and try again in a better market next year.
Naz's floor is the MLE and his ceiling is probably 20-25 per and he will have a lot of suitors most of which will be trying to swing a sign and trade.
NAW's ceiling is the MLE and some team could very well give that to him but it's not going to be us.
Minott is as good as gone.
Garza is likely gone too but it depends on what we do in the draft and if we add another rotation worthy center.
Horrible year for anyone looking for a deal above the MLE.
Randle isn't getting 30 per in the market this summer and will opt in and try again in a better market next year.
Naz's floor is the MLE and his ceiling is probably 20-25 per and he will have a lot of suitors most of which will be trying to swing a sign and trade.
NAW's ceiling is the MLE and some team could very well give that to him but it's not going to be us.
Minott is as good as gone.
Garza is likely gone too but it depends on what we do in the draft and if we add another rotation worthy center.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,965
- And1: 2,665
- Joined: Feb 11, 2018
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
We are keeping Naz and Randle.
But I sadly 100% expect NAW to be gone. There goes our deep bench asset.
Wish we could sacrifice Conley on his last legs instead. But it wouldn't probably help.
But I sadly 100% expect NAW to be gone. There goes our deep bench asset.
Wish we could sacrifice Conley on his last legs instead. But it wouldn't probably help.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,288
- And1: 602
- Joined: Nov 21, 2023
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
Would be nice to see Julius play well the rest of the year and entice someone to offer something he couldn’t refuse... said team would have to make a move for cap space, but it could be done.
*Biggest Julius fan of all time right now*
*Biggest Julius fan of all time right now*
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,838
- And1: 1,042
- Joined: Feb 10, 2023
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
For me mostly depend on 2 things. What we do in the PO?
How aggressive we want to be in off season? if we want to go for a KD level player, mostly Randle and Rudy are gone. In this case, we have to keep NAZ.
I'm not sure about NAW. He is a good player but considering how salary issues, it seems hard to keep both him and NAZ .
How aggressive we want to be in off season? if we want to go for a KD level player, mostly Randle and Rudy are gone. In this case, we have to keep NAZ.
I'm not sure about NAW. He is a good player but considering how salary issues, it seems hard to keep both him and NAZ .
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,288
- And1: 602
- Joined: Nov 21, 2023
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
FrenchMinnyFan wrote:For me mostly depend on 2 things. What we do in the PO?
How aggressive we want to be in off season? if we want to go for a KD level player, mostly Randle and Rudy are gone. In this case, we have to keep NAZ.
I'm not sure about NAW. He is a good player but considering how salary issues, it seems hard to keep both him and NAZ .
Agree. Naw unfortunately will be hard to retain.. he as well as i mentioned Julius, could help himself make quite a bit more money with a good showing the rest of the playoffs..
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,018
- And1: 21,717
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
younggunsmn wrote:There is only going to be like one team with any serious cap room (Brooklyn).
Horrible year for anyone looking for a deal above the MLE.
Sign and trades still exist.
Everyone forgets the third part of a free agency "bidding war." It's not just about Team A vs Team B. At the end of the day, the PLAYER still has to accept the contract too. Most of them at that level aren't stupid enough to just say "woe is me I guess I have to just accept a 66% pay cut because only one team has cap space." Forget about it! They will find the money!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
- karch34
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,844
- And1: 837
- Joined: Jul 05, 2001
- Location: Valley of the Sun
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
Naz makes our bigs work. He stays. Randle likely opts in and because of TSJ, Dillingham, and Clarke, NAW becomes expendable. I think they try to have Randle opt out and take a longer deal for less but more years. Minott is a casualty and Garza probably stays since we value him more than what market is.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 808
- And1: 295
- Joined: Jan 06, 2022
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
karch34 wrote:Naz makes our bigs work. He stays. Randle likely opts in and because of TSJ, Dillingham, and Clarke, NAW becomes expendable. I think they try to have Randle opt out and take a longer deal for less but more years. Minott is a casualty and Garza probably stays since we value him more than what market is.
Is Naz or Randle more valuable at 3/75?
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 233
- And1: 187
- Joined: Jul 10, 2022
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
I'm gonna have some big separation anxiety if any of our top 8 leave this summer. I still miss KAT!
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,018
- And1: 21,717
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
LSWF wrote:I'm gonna have some big separation anxiety if any of our top 8 leave this summer. I still miss KAT!
I certainly miss him on the personal side, but from an organizational side, I still understand and am good with the decision the team made.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 233
- And1: 187
- Joined: Jul 10, 2022
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
Klomp wrote:LSWF wrote:I'm gonna have some big separation anxiety if any of our top 8 leave this summer. I still miss KAT!
I certainly miss him on the personal side, but from an organizational side, I still understand and am good with the decision the team made.
Yep, I understand the business side. We needed the future flexibility. Being a dye hard homer fanatic, I tend to get too attached to our players.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,135
- And1: 19,096
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
Naz was #5 in the Sixth Man of the Year voting, and NAW was #6. Those guys pull starter money on other teams. They can both raise or lower their next contract by their playoff performances. I had hopes NAW would slip through the cracks, but now I think a sign-and-trade could be likely, if they stay under the second apron.
If MIN simply loses either guy, I count that as a whiff for the GM. Bird rights have value, but only if they are used - either to keep the player or in a sign-and-trade. Letting a player walk for nothing is common, but I still think it’s a mistake.
If MIN simply loses either guy, I count that as a whiff for the GM. Bird rights have value, but only if they are used - either to keep the player or in a sign-and-trade. Letting a player walk for nothing is common, but I still think it’s a mistake.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,639
- And1: 1,875
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
shrink wrote:Naz was #5 in the Sixth Man of the Year voting, and NAW was #6. Those guys pull starter money on other teams. They can both raise or lower their next contract by their playoff performances. I had hopes NAW would slip through the cracks, but now I think a sign-and-trade could be likely, if they stay under the second apron.
If MIN simply loses either guy, I count that as a whiff for the GM. Bird rights have value, but only if they are used - either to keep the player or in a sign-and-trade. Letting a player walk for nothing is common, but I still think it’s a mistake.
I don’t see a sign and trade happening for NAW. First, I’m not sure he’s going to get more than the 4yr/60m MLE, which any team can sign him to without giving up value. And even if a S/T was available, I’m not sure the Wolves would do it. The point of letting him walk is that we don’t want to add that salary, a S/T would require us to take back equal salary. If we were going to take on salary, I’d just keep NAW.
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,018
- And1: 21,717
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
jpatrick wrote:shrink wrote:Naz was #5 in the Sixth Man of the Year voting, and NAW was #6. Those guys pull starter money on other teams. They can both raise or lower their next contract by their playoff performances. I had hopes NAW would slip through the cracks, but now I think a sign-and-trade could be likely, if they stay under the second apron.
If MIN simply loses either guy, I count that as a whiff for the GM. Bird rights have value, but only if they are used - either to keep the player or in a sign-and-trade. Letting a player walk for nothing is common, but I still think it’s a mistake.
I don’t see a sign and trade happening for NAW. First, I’m not sure he’s going to get more than the 4yr/60m MLE, which any team can sign him to without giving up value. And even if a S/T was available, I’m not sure the Wolves would do it. The point of letting him walk is that we don’t want to add that salary, a S/T would require us to take back equal salary. If we were going to take on salary, I’d just keep NAW.
No it doesn't.
See: Anderson, Kyle.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,833
- And1: 2,911
- Joined: Jul 02, 2022
-
Re: Value of upcoming MN FA
shrink wrote:Naz was #5 in the Sixth Man of the Year voting, and NAW was #6. Those guys pull starter money on other teams. They can both raise or lower their next contract by their playoff performances. I had hopes NAW would slip through the cracks, but now I think a sign-and-trade could be likely, if they stay under the second apron.
If MIN simply loses either guy, I count that as a whiff for the GM. Bird rights have value, but only if they are used - either to keep the player or in a sign-and-trade. Letting a player walk for nothing is common, but I still think it’s a mistake.
Question is what is starter money?
Cam Johnson, Green, Brooks, Barett, Gordon around 24M; Powell - 20M; OG - 19M;
Key bench: Monk - 17; Gafford, Toppin - 14M; Hield, KA - 9M; Naz - 15;
Is NAW really going to start over those guys? Or some of the younger guys with cheaper contract?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves