ImageImageImage

Tyrus Thomas

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,276
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Tyrus Thomas 

Post#1 » by shrink » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:07 pm

Can this guy fit here at all, with Big Al here?

His trade price is in the toilet right now, and his age and draft position has him continue to pop up on my "acquire" list. CHI could also use some "win now" production which I'd be happy to provide if we had any use for the guy.

Thoughts?
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

 

Post#2 » by dunkonu21 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:09 pm

bad work ethic
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#3 » by deeney0 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:10 pm

Depends on what they'd want. Minimum would probably be TT for Buckner+Craigers - and it's possible they'd want even more than that.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#4 » by Krapinsky » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:10 pm

Well now that Deng is out for "weeks" with a sore achilles, I don't see the Bulls making any trades to win now. They're probably already thinking about next year.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#5 » by deeney0 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:15 pm

Chicago is only two games out of the playoffs; if anything, the Deng injury will probably raise their want to win now.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by 4ho5ive » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:24 pm

I dont like Ty Thomas at all. His work ethic is questionable, he has never seemed like a team player, he doesnt really have a position he plays well. He is athletic but IMO he will never be a good swingman and he will never be an elite PF either. His D is suspect also. Not the kind of young player I want to acquire.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

 

Post#7 » by revprodeji » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:35 pm

I like TT, his work ethic has been in question, but he is a player that MNWI was crazy about this summer when he saw him working on his jumper and a possible switch to the 3 spot.

That being said, he would not really have a roll here and I would not want to spend anything of value for him at the moment.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

 

Post#8 » by big3_8_19_21 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:47 pm

I would take Cookie over Thomas any day of the week.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,720
And1: 11,821
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

 

Post#9 » by HotelVitale » Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:59 pm

Speaking as a Bulls fan, Thomas is certainly a bit of a mystery, and no one's happy with him being taken over Aldridge, Gay, or Roy. But he's on a rook contract for two more years, and he's still got huge potential. If he can get his head on straight, he could easily be something like Kenyon Martin circa 2002, 16/8 with steals and blocks. And he's 21. So he's really young, could be really good, and he doesn't make much money--why would they trade him for Greg Buckner and Craig Smith?

Also, don't forget how deep the Bulls are:
SF: Deng Nocioni Thabo
PF: Joe Smith Tyrus
C: Ben Wallace Noah Gray
There's not enough playing time to go around as is. Craig Smith would be lucky to see 10 minutes per on this team.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#10 » by deeney0 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:05 am

You would be very pleasantly surprised with Craig Smith; were a Smith for TT trade to go down, Craig would probably get 20-25 minutes at PF on that team, easy.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,995
And1: 6,011
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

 

Post#11 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:11 am

HotelVitale wrote:Speaking as a Bulls fan, Thomas is certainly a bit of a mystery, and no one's happy with him being taken over Aldridge, Gay, or Roy. But he's on a rook contract for two more years, and he's still got huge potential. If he can get his head on straight, he could easily be something like Kenyon Martin circa 2002, 16/8 with steals and blocks. And he's 21. So he's really young, could be really good, and he doesn't make much money--why would they trade him for Greg Buckner and Craig Smith?

Also, don't forget how deep the Bulls are:
SF: Deng Nocioni Thabo
PF: Joe Smith Tyrus
C: Ben Wallace Noah Gray
There's not enough playing time to go around as is. Craig Smith would be lucky to see 10 minutes per on this team.


HotelVitale wrote:In all honesty and in complete objectivity--I'm a Pistons fan by loyalty--ZBo and Al are very very similar rebounders.


:-?
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

 

Post#12 » by B Calrissian » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:37 am

big3_8_19_21 wrote:I would take Cookie over Thomas any day of the week.


Smith will be a backup if he stays with us. Thomas could start at the 3 for us and back up Al at the 4. I know Thomas is not a great fit for us but neither is Smith. I think that everyone here values Smith too much.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#13 » by deeney0 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:42 am

Who's to say Thomas would start at 3? He's full of potential, but he's not producing any better right now than Gomes or Brewer, or whoever you call the SF in our three guard Bassy/McCants/Jaric lineup.
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

 

Post#14 » by B Calrissian » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:49 am

He could start at 3. Brewer should come off the bench until he gets his shot down. Gomes has been playing great and should start. I would say Jaric plays sf.

My point was that Smith is no better a fit than Thomas would be. Thomas simply has more value.
the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

 

Post#15 » by the_bruce » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:58 am

TT can play the 4 with Al at the 5. The reason al at the 5 is bad is because Cookie cant guard people. TT has the athletic potential/ability to guard Most 3/4's and can get up and block some shots like woah.

Cookie cant guard most 4's, any 3's or 5's.
LordBaldric
General Manager
Posts: 7,611
And1: 1,970
Joined: Jul 14, 2006

 

Post#16 » by LordBaldric » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:08 am

I'm as high on Thomas as anyone, but he's not a 3. You'd have a better chance playing him at the 5 (assuming he bulks up some more) with his long arms and incredible shot blocking and leaping ability.

The "poor work ethic" rumors are totally unsubstantiated. What is undeniable is that he's been totally jerked around in Chiacago, and if he gets traded before getting consistent playing time to develop (he has been productive when given substantial consistent minutes), I expect him to blossom much like Tyson Chandler has after he got away from the Bull's mismanagement of young big men.
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

 

Post#17 » by dunkonu21 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:16 am

bruceallen61 wrote:Cookie cant guard most 4's, any 3's or 5's.


AGREED!
User avatar
Al n' Perk No Layups!
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,532
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2006

 

Post#18 » by Al n' Perk No Layups! » Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:09 am

Devilzsidewalk wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



:-?


:rofl:

Next up:

"As a T'Wolves fan, I can clearly state that the Bulls have no need of someone like Craig Smith. I've watched every game of his career and I've come to the conclusion Thomas is the far better option."
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,598
And1: 24,741
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

conflict of interest? 

Post#19 » by GopherIt! » Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:21 am

"There's not enough playing time to go around as is. Craig Smith would be lucky to see 10 minutes per on this team." "Also, don't forget how deep the Bulls are"


My bad, I forgot about how many inside scoring threats the Bulls
already have - Big Ben, Noah, Joe Smith and
Mr. "Thank God we traded away Aldridge" Tyrus Thomas.
They're absolutely loaded, Craigers would never see the floor there.


Fan of the Bulls and Pistons? During the baseball season, do you ever catch yourself staring at your Albert Pujols poster when you listen to Cubscast? Just wondering.
User avatar
JBoog35
Pro Prospect
Posts: 750
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

 

Post#20 » by JBoog35 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:08 am

I think it'll be an interesting offseason if Craig doesn't get moved by the deadline. Craig, Gomes, and Toine' play the 4. They may be talked about as 3's but they are 4's. Back up 4's so long as Al is on this team. Can't keep all 3. To be honest, I'm warming to the idea of moving all but Toine'. Gomes and Craig could fetch us a decent deal, not to mention. We could resign Bassy and have plenty left over to give GG another shot.
"Dude, all I am saying is we already have a starting RB, his name is Chester Taylor. Besides AP isn't that good anyways. I hope we draft McFadden." --Me after he broke the record.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves