ImageImageImage

Richard Jefferson?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Richard Jefferson? 

Post#1 » by Krapinsky » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:50 pm

Usually I'm the one who advocates staying away from the idea of the wolves adding salary and abandoning the rebuilding process so soon. However, the Nets demies and te wolves improvement got me thinking.

If we could get Jefferson without giving up our 2008 draft pick, Ratliff's contract, or Foye and Brewer, should we do it?

A trade offer could be:

Walker + Buckner + G. Green + McCants + rights to 2009 Boston Pick + rights Miami's future pick.

for

Jefferson + Wright

Wolves would have several roster options--

Foye
Brewer
RJ
Gomes
Big Al

then add our lotto pick next year- Rose/Beasley/Hib/etc. and we have a very exciting team.

thoughts?
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

 

Post#2 » by dunkonu21 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:06 pm

I thought that same thing...I really like Richard Jefferson's game he seems like the smartest guy on that team (J. Kidd aside) and I think he looks very good...I'd rather give up Brewer than McCants for Jefferson though.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#3 » by Krapinsky » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:10 pm

hmm.... i think most people would rather keep Brewer. But if we offered Brewer instead of McCants I think we could keep the Miami pick.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,995
And1: 6,011
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

 

Post#4 » by Devilzsidewalk » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:17 pm

nah, then we'd have to put first initials on their jerseys and "A. Jefferson" looks dumb
Image
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#5 » by deeney0 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:27 pm

I think you're underrating RJ's value by quite a bit.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#6 » by Krapinsky » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:40 pm

what do you think is fair value then? I thought McCant's + two number ones was pretty close to what Phili got for Iverson.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,886
And1: 862
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

 

Post#7 » by karch34 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:12 pm

I'm a big RJ fan and he's the only one of NJ's big 3 that I would be interested in. If we did it without trading Ratliff, Foye, or our 1st rounder, I'd be on board.

It pretty much would mean Al sees major minutes at C as you'd have to go Jefferson-Gomes-Jefferson 3 to 5. I'd be fine including McCants or Brewer, just not both. I think that deal would only prevent us from drafting Beasley this year.

Not sure if NJ would make that kind of move though.
Wingman
Starter
Posts: 2,048
And1: 102
Joined: Feb 17, 2006
Location: St. Paul
   

 

Post#8 » by Wingman » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:12 pm

I wouldn't do that. He makes too much money for too long. And he's soft.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#9 » by Krapinsky » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:16 pm

his contract is reasonable. 36 players in the NBA make more money then he does this year.

Here's what's left of his contract, including this year.

$12,200,000 $13,200,000 $14,200,000 $15,200,000
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#10 » by deeney0 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:17 pm

Boston #1 has little value, it's likely to be late 20s. McCants doesn't hold the value around the league that he does on this board - and until he puts together a couple of months of consistency, he won't.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

 

Post#11 » by Basti » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:24 pm

if we should do a trade which nets us jefferson I guess mccants will be traded because from our side it's better to have a defensive wing man instead of another offensive option. jefferson
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,276
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

 

Post#12 » by shrink » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:37 pm

I think you designed a fair trade and I like richard Jefferson, but I don't think we're close enough to contending to be dropping $12-$15 mil on a swingman. I'd rather see how Brewer develops, and I have high hopes that the MIA pick will eventually be a high one.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

 

Post#13 » by 4ho5ive » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:38 pm

I'll pass, he was a guy I was interested when we were trying to build a contender this past offseason before deciding to destroy & rebuild. Not anymore. Id rather see how Brew develops and I still am not ready to give up on McCants or any amount of picks.

Although that does give me a fantastic idea for a NBA 2K team

C-Al Jefferson
PF-Al Harrington
SF-Richard Jefferson
SG-Jason Richardson
PG-Java Crittenton

I think Shrink just exploded.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

 

Post#14 » by Basti » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:14 pm

4ho5ive wrote:I'll pass, he was a guy I was interested when we were trying to build a contender this past offseason before deciding to destroy & rebuild. Not anymore. Id rather see how Brew develops and I still am not ready to give up on McCants or any amount of picks.

Although that does give me a fantastic idea for a NBA 2K team

C-Al Jefferson
PF-Al Harrington
SF-Richard Jefferson
SG-Jason Richardson
PG-Java Crittenton

I think Shrink just exploded
.


:rofl: :rofl:
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

 

Post#15 » by B Calrissian » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:08 am

I have not watched very many Nets games but this year he seems to have overtaken Carter as the number one option and it has not been good for the team.. I remember reading on the Nets board that he does not get the other players involved enough.

But of course for the right price I wouldn't be able to say no.
User avatar
Sephiroth
Senior
Posts: 736
And1: 108
Joined: Feb 04, 2006

 

Post#16 » by Sephiroth » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:55 am

For sure we'd have to include Theo's expiring, Brewer, and the BOS pick.

I personally wouldn't mind going with Theo, Brewer, Green, BOS pick for RJ and Magloire.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

 

Post#17 » by Basti » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:09 am

Sephiroth wrote:I personally wouldn't mind going with Theo, Brewer, Green, BOS pick for RJ and Magloire.


does that work salarywise?
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

 

Post#18 » by 4ho5ive » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:24 am

Yes it does. Im against it tho.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

 

Post#19 » by Basti » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:35 am

4ho5ive wrote:Yes it does. Im against it tho.


me too

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves