smith,green for ariza

chefy · Post #1 » by **chefy** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:45 pm

smith,green for ariza( i changed it because farmar's salary doesnt match with smith and green's) would you guys do it?

Devilzsidewalk · Post #2 » by **Devilzsidewalk** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:45 pm

yes

would you?

deeney0 · Post #3 » by **deeney0** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:48 pm

That one's interesting.

Varejao17 · Post #4 » by **Varejao17** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:56 pm

I'd do it...

shrink · Post #5 » by **shrink** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:58 pm

Ariza has a $3.3 mil player option next season, so my questions would be:

1. Do we want another swingman?

2. If we do, what if he walks?

Krapinsky · Post #6 » by **Krapinsky** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:59 pm

Lakers wouldn't do it. Ariza fills a glaring need for them- a wing defender. Smith duplicates Ronny Turiaf for them, who is having a break out year. Green adds nothing.

dunkonu21 · Post #7 » by **dunkonu21** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:01 pm

I don't think the Wolves do that...There are better fits we could work out...

chefy · Post #8 » by **chefy** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:02 pm

im trying to make a 3 way trade

nets

farmar,smith,green,radman,brown

min

ariza

lal

kidd

deeney0 · Post #9 » by **deeney0** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:02 pm

He edited the title. It originally said smith,green for farmar.

dunkonu21 · Post #10 » by **dunkonu21** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:03 pm

give the wolves Kwame.

chefy · Post #11 » by **chefy** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:06 pm

deeney0 wrote:He edited the title. It originally said smith,green for farmar.

yea my bad

famar for smith and green doesnt work because the salary doesnt match
thats why i changed farmar to ariza

karch34 · Post #12 » by **karch34** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:07 pm

Ariza doesn't really interest me, so I'd pass.

deeney0 · Post #13 » by **deeney0** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:11 pm

Don't edit next time, just post your revelations later in the thread.

Ariza doesn't do it for me.

chefy · Post #14 » by **chefy** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:13 pm

how about ariza+lal's 2nd pck for green,smith

???

Devilzsidewalk · Post #15 » by **Devilzsidewalk** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:17 pm

Farmar, Ariza, Vujacic

for

Smith, Telfair, Gerald Green

TheProdigy · Post #16 » by **TheProdigy** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:23 pm

How about
Vujacic + future 1st
for
Smith + Green

chefy · Post #17 » by **chefy** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:30 pm

DaKidKG wrote:How about
Vujacic + future 1st
for
Smith + Green

smith+ green + mins 2nd for vujacic 1st ?

deeney0 · Post #18 » by **deeney0** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:31 pm

DaKidKG wrote:How about
Vujacic + future 1st
for
Smith + Green

Why?

Krapinsky · Post #19 » by **Krapinsky** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:31 pm

Hello. Los Angeles resident here. Farmar is not getting moved for no reason. He has far exceeded expectations over here. Ariza isn't getting moved either- they like how he fits. The Lakers like their chemistry and they're not going to mess with it for no reason.

No team out there wants Green or Telfair for anything but an expiring contract. They're not going to give up useful, cheap, and productive players for expiring contracts.

Devilzsidewalk · Post #20 » by **Devilzsidewalk** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:40 pm

fine they can keep Farmar, give up Crittenton