Nick Fazekas dropped by Mavs

Krapinsky · Post #1 » by **Krapinsky** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:12 pm

Any interest? I think he's a better prospect than Richard. Everyone on this board loves Frye (who I hate), and isn't Fazekas just Frye with more range on his shot? He might compliment Al nicely. At the same time I'd hate to see Richard go, but if Fazekas is the better prospect then might as well pick him up.

UNC4215 · Post #2 » by **UNC4215** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:18 pm

I think waiving green would be a better idea since it seems we aren't trying to ship him off.Im all for it

dunkonu21 · Post #3 » by **dunkonu21** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:27 pm

That is definitely something to consider if we do any 2-1 trades.

4ho5ive · Post #4 » by **4ho5ive** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:30 pm

Can Fazekas play C though? I thought he was strictly a 4?

MN Die Hard · Post #5 » by **MN Die Hard** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:35 pm

Im all for giving him a look but I'm with UNC....I'd drop Green (or Doleac) before Richard.

Wasnt Fazekas supposed to be McHale-like coming out of colleage, with a decent post game? I cant recall anymore.

Krapinsky · Post #6 » by **Krapinsky** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:35 pm

Play C? Can Frye? Can Richard? No, No, and I don't think Fazekas could either. He'd be a backup at the four, and for spurts Al could slide to the 5 with Fazekas at the 4.

UNC4215 · Post #7 » by **UNC4215** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:40 pm

MN Die Hard wrote:Im all for giving him a look but I'm with UNC....I'd drop Green (or Doleac) before Richard.

Wasnt Fazekas supposed to be McHale-like coming out of colleage, with a decent post game? I cant recall anymore.

Might be hawes your thinking of...

shrink · Post #8 » by **shrink** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:08 pm

I'd drop Doleac. Fazekas was 20-10 in the D-League.

kandiking · Post #9 » by **kandiking** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:12 pm

shrink wrote:I'd drop Doleac. Fazekas was 20-10 in the D-League.

damn. yeah what would it take to drop richard? 200k?

Krapinsky · Post #10 » by **Krapinsky** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:26 pm

How about Doleac + Smith for Elson + Spurs 2008 #1? (or a similar trade) Then we pick up Fazekas.

We get a 5, a late first, and Fazekas, for Smith (not needed w/ Fazekas and Gomes), and Doleac.

MN Die Hard · Post #11 » by **MN Die Hard** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:51 pm

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:How about Doleac + Smith for Elson + Spurs 2008 #1? (or a similar trade) Then we pick up Fazekas.

We get a 5, a late first, and Fazekas, for Smith (not needed w/ Fazekas and Gomes), and Doleac.

I'd be all over that....

karch34 · Post #12 » by **karch34** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:06 pm

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:How about Doleac + Smith for Elson + Spurs 2008 #1? (or a similar trade) Then we pick up Fazekas.

We get a 5, a late first, and Fazekas, for Smith (not needed w/ Fazekas and Gomes), and Doleac.

I'd do that deal too.

I liked Fazekas coming out of college. Very interested in picking him up. Even though he's like 6'10 or 6'11" I thought he was more of a SF due to his shooting range and physique. Either way he'd be a nice player to add to the mix, especially after a 2 for 1 trade.

mnWI · Post #13 » by **mnWI** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:13 pm

Pass on Fazekas. He's a slightly more skilled version of Rick Rickert (who was a D-League All-Star last season). He has very slow feet, a weak body, and he sucks defensively.

GopherIt! · Post #14 » by **GopherIt!** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:37 pm

and he sucks defensively.

Now that's what I call scouting. ':D'

Post #15 » by **revprodeji** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:55 am

mnwi beat me to it, kid is soft and a 4, we do not need him.