Page 1 of 1
Did Wittman try to tank the last game
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:41 am
by cpfsf
changed subject, no one cared
Doleac 18 minutes
Madsen 4 minutes
Buckner 3 minutes
Jefferson 26 minutes
Richard 22 minutes
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:45 am
by revprodeji
no
The lotto changes the future of the wolves.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:46 am
by Klomp
I don't believe so. I think its respectable to let guys play who don't play often.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:49 am
by cpfsf
The reason I think he did was because Richard was playing terrible and he almost matched Jefferson's minutes. Where was Big Al the whole game? 4 players had more minutes then the guy the Wolves traded KG for.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:50 am
by PeeDee
There's also the fact that we watched Snyder go down... the same could've happened to Al in a meaningless game.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:53 am
by Klomp
PeeDee wrote:There's also the fact that we watched Snyder go down... the same could've happened to Al in a meaningless game.
Exactly. and I don't call lottery balls meaningful.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:54 am
by PeeDee
Al's health >>>>>> a couple of lottery balls.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:24 am
by Krapinsky
It's hard to say we tried to tank, then beat a team with a better record. The changes he made obviously worked because we we're down a decent amount and came back to win.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:29 am
by Calinks
That was pretty much all Brewer with a little Shad sprinkled ii the middle, with a Foye on the top.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:09 pm
by chrbal
The Wolves tanked the season, not a bad thing for a young rebuilding team, so why not tank the last game.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:35 pm
by Vega06
lol calm down its the last game of the season he let everyone get in the game...big deal..we won
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:06 pm
by kandiking
i don't think so. we won.