Post#2 » by shrink » Tue May 27, 2008 4:42 pm
First, thanks for the posting the article here, and thanks for not titling the thread "McHale Wants Love!"
I hope this is just a smokescreen, because I'd like to see Mayo here. However, if its true, Love, IMO, is not a top 5 pick. If McHale is going to trade down for Love, he needs to do the LAC deal that posters from all three RealGM forums seemed to like. The Clippers will pay the most to keep Mayo home, filling seats:
MIN GIVES: #3 + Jaric + #34
MIN GETS: #7 + Etan Thomas + future 1st returned + MEM prot future 1st (top 19, 18, ...)
We trade down the #3, but get two protected 1sts back. this slices a year off Jaric, and Etan can play a little center. McHale gets our first back in a Jaric deal with LAC
LAC GIVES: #7 + Tim Thomas + MIN future 1st
LAC GETS: #3 + Jaric
They fulfill their dream of getting Mayo.
WAS GIVES: Etan Thomas + MEM prot future 1st (top 19, 18, ..)
WAS GETS: Tim Thomas + #34
Same contract, better player. Haywood hates Etan Thomas. WAS is lux sensitive, so it removes a second guaranteed pick salary in 2009, and gives them a high second this year they can stash
The draft goes:
CHI: Rose
MIA: Beasley
LAC: Mayo
SEA: Bayless
MEM: Lopez
NYK: ????
I suppose its possible that the Knicks would pick Love, but I think they go Gallinari. I like both, and I'd take the risk of trading for #7 with all the other small incentives we'd pick up.