Page 1 of 2
OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:30 am
by big3_8_19_21
Guaranteed contracts:
Rondo/Pruitt
Allen
Pierce
Garnett/Powe/Scalabrine/Davis
Perkins
RFAs: Tony Allen
UFAs: Eddie House, James Posey (player option), Sam Cassell, PJ Brown, Scot Pollard
What they can use:
picks 30 and 60 as well as the MLE (idk about the LLE)
Possible FA targets: Juan Dixon, Mickael Pietrus, Matt Barnes, Jarvis Hayes, Theo Ratliff, Fred Jones, Maurice Evans, Carlos Arroyo, Keyon Dooling, Beno Udrih, Gilbert Arenas (is he desperate enough for a title?)
Possible RFA targets: Delonte West, Ronny Turiaf, Juan Carlos Navarro, Ryan Gomes, Craig Smith, Kirk Snyder
Possible targets at 30: basically all the guys we've talked about at 31. Pekovic, Asik, Weaver, Walker, Thompson, Ibaka, Ajinca, Hardin, Jawai, Lee, Hickson, Anderson, anyone that slips, etc...
Ideally they would get Chalmers at 30, but I think he'll get snapped up no later than 26 by the Spurs who also need a back-up PG.
Posey needs to return for sure, then back-up PG should be addressed. Dixon and Navarro are like House in that they are more of SG-type guys in a PG body, so House would probably be re-signed before either of the other 2 are pursued. PJ Brown should retire, so Powe and Davis could possibly take his minutes, as they were the back-ups most of the season, but they might want to keep one seasoned big for the playoffs off the bench. Maybe Ratliff would do the trick. Players like Arroyo, Dooling, and Udrih should get some major consideration.
I honestly would not be surprised if Arenas jumped on with the Celts for the MLE for a year if he doesn't find the money he wants.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:12 pm
by shrink
Posey deserves most of the MLE, which I think means that BOS then adds aging ex-superstars, trying to get a ring. Maybe Zo. or Kurt Thomas for the vet min.
This, of course, would be bad news for us, since now that KG has his ring, we want BOS to do as poorly as possible, to get the most out of 2009 BOS 1st (top 3 protected).
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:13 pm
by shrink
double post
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:52 pm
by revprodeji
I understand the KG love and devotion. But this is the wolves forum, not the celtics. Could you explain why I should not lock this thread?
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:03 pm
by big3_8_19_21
well, I guess I can't stop you, but I just wanted to discuss the Celts and the possibility of their sustained greatness with my fellow wolves posters rather than if I started this in a different forum, it would have a whole different community of posters responding.
If you need a Wolves related reason: we have their 1st round pick next year, their roster make-up affects the placement of that pick.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:07 pm
by revprodeji
WHy discuss the celtics with wolves fans? The roster does change the 1st rd pick. So there is value there.
I just do not like the image that MN is the JV for boston and the talk of boston makes that seem more likely.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:26 pm
by big3_8_19_21
I could add something in the title about the pick
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:14 pm
by casey
revprodeji wrote:I just do not like the image that MN is the JV for boston and the talk of boston makes that seem more likely.
Well...it is true.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:31 pm
by revprodeji
With your devotion to portland do you think your opinion of minnesota really matters much?

Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:15 pm
by casey
Devotion?
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:21 pm
by revprodeji
I was under the impression that you were a born-again Portland fan. Singing your praises on the alter-call of oden? Rather than faithfully attending the true church of Minnesota.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:25 pm
by casey
I may not always attend the church, but there's no doubt I still believe in its message.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:08 pm
by revprodeji
Makes no sense from an ecclesiological or even a soteriological perspective, but I get your point.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:57 pm
by Devilzsidewalk
for the record, MN didn't give Boston any favors. Big Papi and Moss had nothing to do with us, we didn't know Big Papi would start a strict HGH regiment after leaving Minnesota and Moss is on Oakland more than us. KG we got fair value for, and the one time Boston should have dealt with us, they got burned for not trading their overrated "prospects" for Johan.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:09 pm
by D1SGRUNTL3D
casey wrote:revprodeji wrote:I just do not like the image that MN is the JV for boston and the talk of boston makes that seem more likely.
Well...it is true.
Who are the Blazers picking 13th anyways?
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:51 pm
by casey
revprodeji wrote:Makes no sense from an ecclesiological or even a soteriological perspective, but I get your point.
Those words make no sense.
D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:casey wrote:revprodeji wrote:I just do not like the image that MN is the JV for boston and the talk of boston makes that seem more likely.
Well...it is true.
Who are the Blazers picking 13th anyways?
Haven't a clue.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:12 am
by revprodeji
casey wrote:revprodeji wrote:Makes no sense from an ecclesiological or even a soteriological perspective, but I get your point.
Those words make no sense.
You wrote
"I may not always attend the church, but there's no doubt I still believe in its message."
Suggesting that the "message" is the importance, but that the "church" is not essential. The patristic, and for some the current, view is that the purpose of the church is the eschatological gathering of the people of God for purification. Unity and sanctfication go hand in hand. Thus, your statement made no sense from an ecclesiological (church) and soteriological (salvation) standpoint.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:33 am
by casey
revprodeji wrote:casey wrote:revprodeji wrote:Makes no sense from an ecclesiological or even a soteriological perspective, but I get your point.
Those words make no sense.
You wrote
"I may not always attend the church, but there's no doubt I still believe in its message."
Suggesting that the "message" is the importance, but that the "church" is not essential. The patristic, and for some the current, view is that the purpose of the church is the eschatological gathering of the people of God for purification. Unity and sanctfication go hand in hand. Thus, your statement made no sense from an ecclesiological (church) and soteriological (salvation) standpoint.
I had a reply typed up with a bunch of big words, but it wasn't quite to my satisfaction. You may have won the war, but the battle is over. Or something.
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:15 am
by Mr.Monday Night
2 words guys.. GRANT HILL.. that guy needs a ring.. He's been classy his whole career.. Who knew what coulda happened if it weren't for the injuries..
Re: OT: Boston's roster next season
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:07 pm
by Devilzsidewalk
Mr.Monday Night wrote:2 words guys.. GRANT HILL.. that guy needs a ring.. He's been classy his whole career.. Who knew what coulda happened if it weren't for the injuries..
2 words: James Poseyiswaybetterthangranthill