funkatron101 wrote:I thought you were done with this board?
Sorry, but if I run by a thread of people contemplating ways to screw over my team I'm going to respond, make no doubt about it.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
funkatron101 wrote:I thought you were done with this board?
OdenRoyLMA2 wrote:This entire thread is just bush league. Seriously, find a different way to improve your team, rather than screwing over others. Haven't you ever heard of Karma? .
shrink wrote:OdenRoyLMA2 wrote:This entire thread is just bush league. Seriously, find a different way to improve your team, rather than screwing over others. Haven't you ever heard of Karma? .
Its called competition, commie.
OdenRoyLMA2 wrote:This entire thread is just bush league. Seriously, find a different way to improve your team, rather than screwing over others. Haven't you ever heard of Karma?funkatron101 wrote:I thought you were done with this board?
Sorry,...
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
shrink wrote:OdenRoyLMA2 wrote:This entire thread is just bush league. Seriously, find a different way to improve your team, rather than screwing over others. Haven't you ever heard of Karma? .
Its called competition, commie.
funkatron101 wrote:This entire thread is just bush league. Seriously, find a different way to improve your team, rather than screwing over others. Haven't you ever heard of Karma?
Sorry, but if I run by a thread of people contemplating ways to screw over my team I'm going to respond, make no doubt about it.
Another risk I see, disregarding the discussion of a GM specifically signing a guy just to screw over another team, but the risk of team chemistry. Not saying Miles immeidately walks in and starts disrupting the entire locker, he isn't satan. But, I have never seen confirmation on the amount of time he has to play in those 10 games. Am guessing just a tiny bit, no actual minute requirement. But most of the players will probably know the circumstances of why he is signed, even if a team tries to say they think he can actually contribute. So if I'm a 12th, 13th, 14th man on a roster, busting my butt to try to even make the league, I'm going to be upset at my team for signing a guy with the intent of screwing up another team's cap space. And, on top of that, not only giving him a roster spot I worked hard for, but most likely giving him the garbage playing time I might have been able to get. So you have disgruntled bench players, and sure, that isn't the worst thing in the world, but better to have a harmonius locker room than individuals upset with management. Anyways, I'm not too concerned about this, as a Blazers fan. I doubt we go into next offseason specifically looking to sign a free agent. A trade seems much more likely, to me.
GopherIt! wrote: And what other team is going to want to sign or trade for a marginal player who is a disruption in the locker room?
cucad8 wrote:GopherIt! wrote: And what other team is going to want to sign or trade for a marginal player who is a disruption in the locker room?
Well, this is a discussion about signing Miles.
mrmossy84 wrote:TheFranchise21 wrote:Man what happened to D. Miles? Dude was supposed to be the 2nd coming of KG.
defintely an NTer...lol
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves