RealGM

just wondering if anyone would do this
Camby/returned 1st for Mike Miller and maybe bos 1st ????

i think clippers really lack a sg and we really lack a defensive centre next to al so i think its a great fit for both teams
davis hasnt really worked out and is probley better as a 6th man and gorden is still a rookie

what do you guys think????

Camby is really overrated and many Nuggets and now Clips fans say that he is selfish. not someone I'm looking for. getting the pick back would be sweet though.

Miller hasn't really fit in so far like I thought he would. I would consider it.

Camby is certainly the type of center we need. If he was 5 or 6 years younger, I would do it. I just don't think we are close enough to winning to justify renting an aging player for a couple years. If we had a young project that he could mentor while he was playing, it would be a different story.

As for Miller...he hasn't been what I was expecting (yet) but he is playing well and contributing to the team in ways other than scoring (i.e., rebounding, assists). If McCants was doing those things like Miller, I don't think everyone would be calling for his head. The team (read PG) just needs to figure out how to get Miller more shots per game.

At this point the Clips are going to give Eric Gordon all the chances in the world in that 2 spot.

I'd say bad for both teams. Camby is very selfish, and over-rated as a defender. He often leaves his man, playing bad man-to-man defense, just so he can try and get a block. For every block he gets, he gives up 3 or 4 easy baskets. I wouldn't want him on this team, or mentoring anyone.

Gordon is the starting 2 for the Clippers, they don't need Miller.

I wouldn't trade Miller for Camby, but I'd do expirings (Collins/McCants) and a Boston or Utah first for Camby

presumably as Camby ages and gets less effective, Love will get more effective and deserve more minutes

Then his contract expires just in time to bring over Pekovic

exactly what I was thinking Devilz. I don't think Camby's value is at a Mike miller to be honest. the clippers have stated that they are going to try and see if it works out with kaman/randolph/camby, but if they could just clear the salary, it may be worth it. Collins is nowhere near the athlete, but he does provide decent D and he would be more than happy coming off the bench unlike Camby (or Kaman). Plus, they have Jordan to develop and should get him more minutes. On the other hand, they are actually built to win now...so I am not sure.

Its interesting, but I don't think the Wolves are contenders for the next two years, so I think they wouldn't do this deal because of Camby's age.

Kaman, who rumors say would be the more likely of the two (if either) to get traded, would be more appealing here. I don't know that his trade value is significantly different.

Finally, I think working on returning the pick is a good idea. It looks like LAC is going to have to keep waiting on it anyway, and if things don't work out later in the season, they could use young talent now to bring up around similarly-aged Gordon and Thorton. The Wolves would like the pick back to reduce risk and untie their hands a bit in trades. Maybe even a couple late firsts for the picks return would be beneficial to both teams.

I'd rather see Kaman on the Wolves. But that might be because Camby is one of my least favorite players in the league,

Anyone who thinks Kaman can add anything positive to a team doesn't watch the games close enough.

mnWI wrote:Anyone who thinks Kaman can add anything positive to a team doesn't watch the games close enough.

You wouldn't go with Camby at this stage of his, and our, development though, right?

Who would your top five centers to trade for be, MNWI?

That is a good and tough question shrink. I know we have looked at what potential centers would be out there before, but may be worth revisting. The big thing is figuring out what we would be willing to give up to get one.

ATL: Horford is another big 4, Pachulia is a no thank you.
BOS: Perkins is big and that's about it, Davis is the same, but bigger and not as tall.
CHA: Okafor isn't 7ft, but is a very good player; Nazr isn't what he used to be; Ajinca is raw.
CHI: Gooden is not a center, Noah is young and erratic, Gray is still got a ways to go.
CLE: Wallace and Z are both paid way too much and too old, Varejao is not a true center but playing well enough.
DAL: Dampier makes too much and limited, Diop has a long contract but we have had interest.
DEN: Nene is a no no in my book due to cost and injuries, Hunter is less than inspiring
DET: Wallace, Johnson, Maxiel all glorified 4's playing in the east where size doesn't matter.
GS: Bierdins is more of a very athletic 4 in my book and would be tough to even pry away, they have length but no other real centers for Nellie ball.
HOU: No one touches Yao, everything else is a 4 backing up until ancient Mt. Mutumbo returns.
IND: Hibbert is there best center, Foster is what he is, Rasho is well known here, Murphy is able to play minutes there but more of a 4.
LAC: Kamen has been interesting, but down of late; Camby is past prime a bit; Jordan is raw.
LAL: Gasol can play center but is a finesse player, Bynum is unattainable I think, Mihm here as well.
MEM: The other Gasol is their mainstay, Darko has been discussed, Haddadi is raw.
MIA: We have had our share of the Blount already, Magloire is on roster, Mourning may return.
MIL: Bogut was discussed around draft time, Gadz looked good against us preseason.
NJN: Youth movement in play with Williams, Boone, Lopez, Jianlian, Swift, Anderson. How many bigs do they plan to play?
NOH: Chandler is interesting though probably a product of CP3, Armstrong is raw.
NYK: Yeah Curry!.........
OKC: Wilcox toar us up, Collison is fundamental, then the kids Swift, Petro, Sene are on roster.
ORL: Howard = pipedream, Battie is a no thank you we already have Collins.
PHI: Dalembart has been discussed, Spreights is young and probably would cost us more.
PHO: The Shaq is ready to crumble (aka old), Lopez was someone we looked at draft time.
POR: Oden is untouchable, Pryzbilla (aka Vanilla Gorilla) is probably not what we really want.
SAC: Miller too old, Moore not good, Hawes and Thompson is their future.
SAN: Duncan is unattainable and a 4, Thomas is a 4, Oberto is not good.
TOR: O'Neal is soft and older, Bargs is a 3 in a 5's body, Jawaii is raw, Bosh is unattainable, No Hump.
UTA: Has some intersting pieces, but all odd for fit and price. Okur, Boozer (a 4), Kirilenko, Koufos, Milsap, and the other Collins. All play the 4 or 5, not sure any are what we would want.


That's about all of them. For the established centers Chandler interests me even if he rides off of CP3. Long and athletic. Would end up costing us way too much.

Successful Trade Scenario
Congratulations on a successful trade.
Due to Minnesota and New Orleans being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Minnesota and New Orleans had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Trade ID
Trade ID #4850277
Every trade made by fans is allocated a unique Trade ID which you can share with friends and fellow basketball fans to allow them to see your trade scenario.

Minnesota Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: -7.1 ppg, +1.0 rpg, and -0.2 apg.
Incoming Players
Melvin Ely
6-10 PF / C from Fresno State
5.5 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.5 apg in 14.0 minutes
Julian Wright
6-8 SF from Kansas
3.4 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 1.0 apg in 10.2 minutes
Rasual Butler
6-7 SF from La Salle
7.4 ppg, 2.6 rpg, 0.6 apg in 21.6 minutes
Tyson Chandler
7-1 C / PF from Dominguez (HS)
8.6 ppg, 8.0 rpg, 0.6 apg in 32.8 minutes
Outgoing Players
Calvin Booth
6-11 C from Penn State
0.0 ppg, 1.0 rpg, 0.0 apg in 0.7 minutes
Rashad McCants
6-4 SG from North Carolina
9.9 ppg, 1.4 rpg, 1.0 apg in 17.8 minutes
Brian Cardinal
6-8 SF / PF from Purdue
0.8 ppg, 0.7 rpg, 0.2 apg in 5.1 minutes
Al Jefferson
6-10 C from Prentiss (HS)
21.3 ppg, 10.1 rpg, 1.7 apg in 35.7 minutes
New Orleans Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +7.1 ppg, -1.0 rpg, and +0.2 apg.
Incoming Players
Calvin Booth
6-11 C from Penn State
0.0 ppg, 1.0 rpg, 0.0 apg in 0.7 minutes
Rashad McCants
6-4 SG from North Carolina
9.9 ppg, 1.4 rpg, 1.0 apg in 17.8 minutes
Brian Cardinal
6-8 SF / PF from Purdue
0.8 ppg, 0.7 rpg, 0.2 apg in 5.1 minutes
Al Jefferson
6-10 C from Prentiss (HS)
21.3 ppg, 10.1 rpg, 1.7 apg in 35.7 minutes
Outgoing Players
Melvin Ely
6-10 PF / C from Fresno State
5.5 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.5 apg in 14.0 minutes
Julian Wright
6-8 SF from Kansas
3.4 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 1.0 apg in 10.2 minutes
Rasual Butler
6-7 SF from La Salle
7.4 ppg, 2.6 rpg, 0.6 apg in 21.6 minutes
Tyson Chandler
7-1 C / PF from Dominguez (HS)
8.6 ppg, 8.0 rpg, 0.6 apg in 32.8 minutes

We probably couldn't do it due to it costing us too much (I know I put in Jefferson, some of his shots or chucks in the post annoy me at times, that and lack of defense, but we really can't trade him I think, though trading for another 4 on draft day still befuddles me), and I doubt NOH would either since they thrive on running and athleticism. Would be interesting to see what others thought on fit.

Ignoring the Chandler for Jefferson trade here's my take on that list.

ATL: Horford is another big 4, Pachulia is a no thank you.
--Depending on what it would take I'd be interested in Pachulia. I liked his attitude in the playoffs.

BOS: Perkins is big and that's about it, Davis is the same, but bigger and not as tall.
--Agree on Perkins, but he'd probably fit well with us.

CHA: Okafor isn't 7ft, but is a very good player; Nazr isn't what he used to be; Ajinca is raw.
--Okafor isn't a true C, but I'd take him.

CHI: Gooden is not a center, Noah is young and erratic, Gray is still got a ways to go.
--I'd still gamble on Noah.

GS: Bierdins is more of a very athletic 4 in my book and would be tough to even pry away, they have length but no other real centers for Nellie ball.
--I'd love Beans.

IND: Hibbert is there best center, Foster is what he is, Rasho is well known here, Murphy is able to play minutes there but more of a 4.
--I don't think they'd give up Hibbert, but Foster or Rasho would be a decent upgrade.

LAC: Kamen has been interesting, but down of late; Camby is past prime a bit; Jordan is raw.
--Still interested in Kaman, no interest in Camby at this stage in his career and price.

MIL: Bogut was discussed around draft time, Gadz looked good against us preseason.
--Gadz is like Zaza in that I'd be interested depending on what we give up